طراحی مدل هوشمند آموزش معماری بومی با رویکرد ساخت گرایی (تمرکز: یادگیری مبتنی بر واقعیت مجازی)
الموضوعات : مجله فناوری اطلاعات در طراحی مهندسی
مصطفی ازقندی
1
,
مهدی یعقوبی
2
,
الهام فریبرزی
3
1 - گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
2 - گروه مهندسی برق، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
3 - گروه علوم تربیتی، واحد مشهد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مشهد، ایران
الکلمات المفتاحية: فناوری‌آموزشی, واقعیت‌مجازی, آموزش معماری, معماری بومی پایدار, مدل‌سازی هوشمند,
ملخص المقالة :
پژوهش حاضر از طریق مدل‌سازی سه‌بعدی معماری بومی ایرانی-اسلامی در بستر واقعیت مجازی و افزوده، اقدام به آموزش اصول پایداری به دانش‌آموزان مقاطع متوسطه نموده است. پس از شناسایی و تبیین مولفه‌های معماری بومی و تعیین عوامل موثر در فرآیند آموزش آن از طریق مرور نظامند ادبیات تحقیق و انجام مصاحبه با طیف وسیعی از خبرگان حوزه پژوهش، در گام بعدی و با استفاده از یک مدل آموزشی مبتنی بر رویکرد ساخت‌گرایی، ﺗﺎرﯾﺦ ﭘﺎﯾﺪاری معماری بومی ایرانی-اسلامی ﺑﺎ دانش‌آموزان ﺑﻪ اﺷﺘﺮاک گذاشته شده است. این برنامه آموزشی از یک مدل سه مرحله‌ای (معرفی، تمرین، تولید) و با بهره‌گیری از ﺳﻪﺑﻌﺪیﺳﺎزی نوآورترین معماری‌های بومی تاریخ کشور عزیزمان، یک ﺗﺠﺮﺑﻪ نوین و جذاب دﯾﺠﯿﺘﺎل در زمینه یادگیری برای توسعه پایدار را در طول سال تحصیلی برای دانش‌آموزان فراهم نموده است. درنهایت و در گام آخر پژوهش، به منظور تعیین میزان بهبود درک دانش‌آموزان از مفاهیم مرتبط با اصول پایداری و معماری بومی، از ابزار پرسشنامه با تعیین روایی و پایایی مطلوب استفاده شده است. یافته‌های پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که مدل‌سازی سه‌بعدی بر افزایش آشنایی داﻧﺶآﻣﻮزان از ویژگی‌های معماری بومی ایرانی-اسلامی و میزان ﺗﻐﯿﯿﺮات داﻧﺶ، رﻓﺘﺎر و آﮔﺎﻫﯽ آنان از ﻣﻔﺎﻫﯿﻢ مرتبط با ﺗﻮﺳﻌﻪ ﭘﺎﯾﺪار و اصول ﭘﺎﯾﺪاری موثر بوده است.
]1[ رکن الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا؛ عارف‌نیا، خجسته؛ سجاسی قیداری، حمداله ؛ فیروزنیا، قدیر؛ صادق لو، طاهره؛ دیانی، لیلا و فتاحی، احدالله (1389). راهبردهای توسعه آموزش توسعه پایدار در ایران، ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﻪ پژوﻫﺸﻲ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ-پژوهشی انجمن جفرافیای ایران، دوره جدید، سال ﻫﺸﺘﻢ، شماره 25، صص 67-47.
[2] ضرغامی، اسماعیل؛ خاکی، علی و سادات، سیده اشرف (1394). بررسی تطبیقی معماری پایدار و مطابقت آن با معماری بومی خانه های سنتی در شهر ایرانی- اسلامی، نشریه معماری و شهرسازی پایدار، دوره 3، شماره 1، صص:30-15.
[3] یوسفی مقدم، الهام (1392). معماری بومی ایرانی با نگرشی اسلامی، اولین همایش ملی معماری، مرمت، شهرسازی و محیط زیست پایدار، همدان،https://civilica.com/doc/263272
[4] Curl, J. S. (2006). A dictionary of architecture and landscape architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[5] Salman, M. (2018). Sustainability and vernacular architecture: Rethinking what identity is—In Hmood, K, Urban and Architectural Heritage Conservation within Sustainability. https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/64381
[6] Kazimee, B. A. (2008). Learning from vernacular architecture: Sustainability and cultural conformity. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 113, 12. doi:10.2495/ARC080011
[7] Jahanara, A.; Javadi Eshkalak, N.; Shahidipour, S. M. & Karimizadeh, A. H. (2014). Vernacular architecture as a strategy: Toward sustainable building design. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT), 3 (6), 1726- 1734.
[8] Nguyen, A. T.; Truong, N. S. H.; Rockwood, D. & Tran Le, A. D. (2019). Studies on sustainable features of vernacular architecture in different regions across the world: A comprehensive synthesis and evaluation. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8, 535-548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.07.006
[9] Ozorhon, G. & Ozorhon I. F. (2020). Learning from vernacular architecture in architectural education. Megaron, 15 (4), 553-564. doi: 10.14744/MEGARON.2020.54036
[10] Biradar V. K. & Mama, Sh. (2017). Vernacular architecture: A sustainable approach. In Seta, F.; Biswas, A.; Khare, A. & Sen, j. Understanding built environment: Proceedings of the National Conference on Sustainable Built Environment 2015. pp. 125-137. Springer.
[11] Kırbaş, B. & Hızlı, N. (2016). Learning from vernacular architecture: Ecological solutions in traditional Erzurum houses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216, 788-799. Urban Planning and Architecture Design for Sustainable Development, UPADSD 14- 16 October 2015.
[12] Abu-Ghazzeh, T. M. (1997). Vernacular architecture education in the Islamic society of Saudi Arabia: Towards the development of an authentic contemporary built Environment. Habitat Intl., 21 (2), 229-253.
[13] Asquith, L. & Vellinga. M. (2006). Vernacular architecture in the twenty-first century: Theory, education, and practice. London: Taylor & Francis. pp. 1-20
[14] Zawacki-Richter, O. & Latchem, C. (2018). Exploring four decades of research in computers and education. Computers and Education, 122, 136-152.
[15] Radianti, J.; Majchrzak, T. A.; Fromm, J. & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers and Education, 147, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
[16] Ebinger, F.; Buttke, L. & Kreimeier, J. (2022). Augmented and virtual reality technologies in education for sustainable development: An expert-based technology assessment. Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice, 31 (1), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.31.1.28
[17] Fernandez, G. & Maione, C. (2019). SDGs VR-Play for KIDS: An education experience on local sustainable solutions using virtual reality to target vulnerable children. International Conference on Sustainable Development (ICSD).
[18] Al-Ansi, A. M.; Jaboob, M.; Garad, A. & Al-Ansi, A. (2023). Analyzing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent development in education. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100532
[19] Phakamach, P.; Senarith, P. & Wachirawongpaisarn, S. (2022). The Metaverse in education: The future of immersive teaching and learning. RICE Journal of Creative Entrepreneurship and Management, 3 (2), 75-88.
[20] Sun, J. C. Y.; Ye, S. L., Yu, S. J. & Chiu, T. K. (2022). Effects of wearable hybrid AR/VR learning material on high school students’ situational interest, engagement, and learning performance: The case of a physics laboratory learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1-12.
[21] Childs, E.; Mohammad, F.; Stevens, L.; Burbelo, H.; Awoke, A.; Rewkowski, N. & Manocha, D. (2021). An overview of enhancing distance learning through augmented and virtual reality technologies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.11000.
[22] Youngblut, C. (1998). Educational uses of virtual reality technology. Alexandria, VA: Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA Document D-2128).
[23] Merchant, Z.; Goetz, E. T.; Cifuentes, L.; Keeney-Kennicutt, W. & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students’ learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 70, 29–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
[24] Ling, H. (2017). Augmented reality in reality. IEEE Multimed, 24, pp. 10-15.
[25] Wang, X. (2012). Augmented reality: A new way of augmented learning. eLearn, 1.
[26] Abad-Segura, E.; González-Zamar, M.; Luque-de la Rosa, A. & Morales Cevallos, M. B. (2020). Sustainability of educational technologies: An approach to augmented reality research. Sustainability, 12, 4091. doi:10.3390/su12104091
[27] Aksel Stenberdt, V. & Makransky, G. (2023). Mastery experiences in immersive virtual reality promote pro-environmental waste-sorting behavior. Computers and Education, 198, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104760
[28] Biocca, F. & Delaney, B. (1995). Immersive virtual reality technology. In Communication in the age of virtual reality. Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. pp. 57-124
[29] Hedberg, J. & Alexander, S. (1994). Virtual reality in education: Defining researchable issues. Educational Media International, 31 (4), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/0952398940310402
[30] Petersen G. B.; Petkakis, G. & Makransky D. (2022). A study of how immersion and interactivity drive VR learning. Computers and Education, 179, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104429
[31] Villena-Taranilla, R.; Tirado-Olivares, S.; C´ozar-Guti´errez, R. & Gonz´alez-Calero, J. A. (2022). Effects of virtual reality on learning outcomes in K-6 education: A meta analysis. Educational Research Review, 35. Article 100434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100434
[32] Pellas, N.; Mystakidis, S. & Kazanidis, I. (2021). Immersive virtual reality in K-12 and higher education: A systematic review of the last decade scientific literature. Virtual Reality, 25, 835–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00489-9
[33] Di Natale, A. F.; Repetto, C.; Riva, G. & Villani, D. (2020). Immersive virtual reality in K-12 and higher education: A 10-year systematic review of empirical research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51, 2006–2033. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13030
[34] Ifanova; Jessicaa, P.; Salima, S.; Edo Syahputraa, M. & Andam, P. (2022). A Systematic literature review on implementation of virtual reality for learning. Procedia Computer Science, 216 (2023), 260–265, 7th International Conference on Computer Science and Computational Intelligence
[35] Al Farsi, Gh.; Bin Mohd Yusof, A.; Jumani Binti Fauzi, W.; Ezanee Bin Rusli, M.; Iqbal Malik, S.; Tawafak, R. M.; Mathew, R. & Jabbar, J. (2021). The practicality of virtual reality applications in education: Limitations and recommendations. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 48 (7), 142–155.
[36] Jiang, L. (2021). Virtual reality action interactive teaching artificial intelligence education system. Hindawi Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5553211
[37]Chavez, B. & Bayona, S. (2018). Virtual reality in the learning process: Trends and advances in information systems and technologies, Springer International Publishing, pp. 1345-1356.
[38] Alanazi, A. (2016). A critical review of constructivist theory and the emergence of constructionism. American Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (ARJHSS), 2, 1-8, doi: 10.21694/2378-7031.16018
[39] Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. Journal of Research and Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 5 (6), 66-70. ISSN: 2320–737X
[40] Bereiter, C. (1994). Constructivism, Socioculturalism, and Popper's World 3. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 21-23.
[41] Khalifa, M. & Shen, N. (2004). System design effects on social presence and telepresence in virtual communities. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2004, 547-558. 12-15 Dec., Washington, ICIS, USA.
[42] Martín-Gutiérrez, J.; Mora, C. E.; Añorbe-Díaz, B. & González-Marrero, A. (2017). Virtual technologies trends in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13 (2), 469–486.
[43] Cox, E. (2019). Experiential learning and learning styles. Oxford Research Encyclopedias, International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.175
[44] Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Experiential learning theory. Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning: Springer, pp. 1215-1219.
[45] Cantor, J. (1995). Experiential learning in higher education: Linking classroom and community. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report (7).
[46] Austin, M. J. & Zeh Rust, D. (2015). Developing an experiential learning program: Milestones and challenges. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 27 (1), 143-153. ISSN 1812-9129
[47] McKeachie, W. J. (2005). McKeachie’s teaching tips: Strategies, research, theory for college, and university teachers (11th ed.). Boston: MA: Houghton Mifflin.
[48] Hus, V.; Aberšek, B. & Jančič, P. (2014). Attitudes of primary education students in slovenia and slovakia towards the constructivist approach to primary science education. Journal of Education and Training, 1 (2), 302-320. doi:10.5296/jet.v1i2.6018
[49] Cakir, M. (2008). Constructivist approaches to learning in science and their implications for science pedagogy: A literature review. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 3 (4), 193-206.
[50] Papert, S. & Harel, I. (1991). Constructionism. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
[51] Markula, A. & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: How teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x
[52] Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. CA: Autodesk Foundation. Available http://www.bie.org/object/document/a_review_of_research_on_project_based_learning. Accessed 30 August 2019.
[53] Condliffe, B.; Quint, J.; Visher, M. G.; Bangser, M. R.; Drohojowska, S.; Saco, L. & Nelson, E. (2017). Project-based learning: A literature review. MDRC: Working Paper. https://www.mdrc.org/publication/project-based-learning. Accessed 31 May 2021.
[54] Parker, W. C.; Lo, J.; Yeo, A. J.; Valencia, S. W.; Nguyen, D.; Abbott, R. D. & Vye, N. J. (2013). Beyond breadth-speed-test: Toward deeper knowing and engagement in an advanced placement course. American Educational Research, 50 (6), 1424–1459. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831213504237
[55] Guo, P.; Saab, N.; Post, L. S. & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586.
[56] Balemen, N. & Özer Keskin, M. (2018). The effectiveness of project-based learning on science education: A meta-analysis search. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 5 (4), 849-865. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/452/297.
[57] Sasson, I.; Yehuda, I. & Malkinson, N. (2018). Fostering the skills of critical thinking and question-posing in a project-based learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 203-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.08.001
[58] Kaldi, S.; Filippatou, D. & Govaris, C. (2011). Project-based learning in primary schools: Effects on pupils' learning and attitudes. Education 3-13, 39 (1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270903179538
[59] Otake, M.; Fukano, R.; Sako, S.; Sugi, M.; Kotani, K.; Hayashi, J.; Noguchi, H.; Yoneda, R.; Taura, K., Otsu, N. & Sato, T. (2009). Autonomous collaborative environment for project-based learning. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 57 (2), 134-138. [60] Hanney, R. & Savin-Baden, M. (2013). The problem of projects: Understanding the theoretical underpinnings of project-led PBL. London Review of Education, 11 (1), 7-19. King, A. (1993) 'From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side'. College Teaching, 41 (1). pp 30-35.
[61] Le, T. T. (2018). Project-based learning in the 21st century: A review of dimensions for implementation in university-level teaching and learning. 4th ICEAC International Conference on English Across Cultures. Bali, Indonesia
[62] Derevenskaiaa, O. (2014). Active learning methods in environmental education of students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 131, 101-104.
[63] Hmelo-Silver, C. E.; Duncan, R. G. & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42 (2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
[64] Harmer, N. & Stoke, A. (2014). The benefits and challenges of project-based learning: A literature review. Pedagogic Research Institute and Observatory (PedRIO). Plymouth University.
[65] Stauffacher, M.; Walter, A. I.; Lang, D. J.; Wiek, A. & Schol, R. W. (2006). Learning to research environmental problems from a functional socio-cultural constructivism perspective: The transdisciplinary case study approach. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 7 (3), 252-275.
[66] لطیفی و همکاران (1397)، شناسایی و تبیین مراحل اجرایی پژوهش با رویکرد دلفی فازی. مهندسی بیوسیستم ایران، دوره49، شماره1، ص 107 الی 120
