Examining Student-Generated Vocabulary Testing Factors Influencing Autonomy among Iranian EFL Learners
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English
Kolsoum Ghasemi
1
,
Shahram Afraz
2
,
Fazlollah Samimi
3
1 - PhD Candidate, Department of English, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm Iran
2 - Department of English, Qeshm Branch, Islamic Azad University Qeshm, Iran
3 - Department of English, Bandar-Abbas Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bandar-Abbas, Iran
کلید واژه: Student-generated testing, Autonomy, learner autonomy, Testing,
چکیده مقاله :
The paper investigated the most and the least factors of student-generated vocabulary testing that can influence EFL learners’ autonomy. This study applies mixed-method research. For the qualitative phase, the researcher used 30 purposive participants and had a semi-structured interview to find the factors and make a questionnaire. The researcher used MAXQDA to analyze the data. Then the researcher prepared a questionnaire and distributed it among 225 convinced participants, making it reliable and valid. The reliability of this questionnaire was 0.92. For the quantitative phase, the researcher used 320 EFL learners who participated. The study instrument was a research-made questionnaire about the factors of student-generated vocabulary testing that can influence EFL learners’ autonomy consisting of two sections. The mean values of the four variables obtained from the participants’ viewpoints reveal which factors of the student-generated vocabulary testing have the most and least effect on autonomy among Iranian EFL learners. After analyzing the questionnaire, the researcher used 30 participants (13 males, 17 females) by random sampling for the qualitative phase to ask them about their point of view of SGVT and its effect on their autonomy. For analyzing the data, the researcher again used MAXQDA. The results of this study show that the most influential factor was ‘Personal characteristics. ‘Teachers’ role’ was determined to be the second significant factor. ‘Positive points of student-generated testing were in the third place, and the least effective one was ‘Negative points of student-generated testing.
Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., Göllner, R., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Student misbehavior and teacher well-being: Testing the mediating role of the teacher-student relationship. Learning and Instruction, 58, 126-136.
Aminatun, D., & Oktaviani, L. (2019). Memrise: Promoting students’ autonomous learning skill through language learning application. Metathesis: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching, 3(2), 214-223.
Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom assessment techniques: A handbook for college teachers, 2, 148-153.
Baker, B. A., & Riches, C. (2018). The development of EFL examinations in Haiti: Collaboration and language assessment literacy development. Language Testing, 35(4), 557-581.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow. England: Pearson Education.
Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(1), 21-40.
Blakey, S. M., & Abramowitz, J. S. (2016). The effects of safety behaviors during exposure therapy for anxiety: Critical analysis from an inhibitory learning perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 49, 1-15.
Borg, S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. (2019). Language learner autonomy in a tertiary context: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 9-38.
Browne, C., & Culligan, B. (2008). Combining technology and IRT testing to build student knowledge of high frequency vocabulary. The Jalt Call Journal, 4(2), 3-16.
Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries' higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 1-20.
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251-19257.
Elkington, S. (2022). Shifts in pedagogy and flexible assessment: integrating digital technology with good teaching and learning practice. In The Emerald handbook of higher education in a post-covid world: New approaches and technologies for teaching and learning (pp. 153-171). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Ghasemi, K., Afraz, Sh., Samimi, F. (In Press). The study of student-generated vocabulary factors affecting EFL learners' autonomy. Journal of Language and Translation
Glăveanu, V. P. (2018). Educating which creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27, 25-32.
Haddad, R. H. (2016). Developing learner autonomy in vocabulary learning in classroom: How and why van it be fostered? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 784-791.
Holec, H., 1979: Autonomy and foreign language learning. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Horst, M. (2005). Learning L2 vocabulary through extensive reading: A measurement study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(3), 355-382.
Jiao, L., Zhu, M., Xu, Z., Zhou, G., Schwieter, J. W., & Liu, C. (2023). An ERP study on novel word learning in an immersive virtual reality context. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 1-9.
Johnson, K. (2017). An introduction to foreign language learning and teaching. Routledge.
Kalelioğlu, F. (2015). A new way of teaching programming skills to K-12 students: Code. org. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 200-210.
Kanotra, S., D’Angelo, D., Phares, T. M., Morrow, B., Barfield, W. D., & Lansky, A. (2007). Challenges faced by new mothers in the early postpartum period: an analysis of comment data from the 2000 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 11, 549-558.
Kusmaryono, I., Gufron, A. M., & Rusdiantoro, A. (2020). Effectiveness of scaffolding strategies in learning against decrease in mathematics anxiety level. NUMERICAL: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 13-22.
Lin, M. H., & Chen, H. G. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553-3564.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy: Definitions. Issues and Problems, 4, 33.
McDevitt, B. (1997). Learner autonomy and the need for learner training. Language Learning Journal, 16(1), 34-39.
Moore, M. G. (1972). Learner autonomy: The second dimension of independent learning. Convergence, 5(2), 76.
Morrison, B. (2011). Independent language learning: Building on experience, seeking new perspectives (Vol. 1). Hong Kong University Press.
Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S. L., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183.
Muliyah, P., Aminatun, D., Nasution, S. S., Hastomo, T., & Sitepu, S. S. W. (2020). Exploring learners’ autonomy in online language-learning in Stai Sufyan Tsauri Majenang. Getsempena English Education Journal, 7(2), 382-394.
Nation, I. S. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press.
Nguyen, N. T. (2014). Learner autonomy in language learning: Teachers’ beliefs (Doctoral dissertation, Queensland University of Technology).
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1997). Vocabulary enhancement activities and reading for meaning in second language vocabulary acquisition. Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition: A Rationale for Pedagogy, 55(4), 174-200.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. (1999). Reading and “incidental” L2 vocabulary acquisition: An introspective study of lexical inferencing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 195-224.
Paribakht, T. S., & Wesche, M. B. (1993). Reading comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. TESL Canada Journal, 09-29.
Pulido, D. (2004). The relationship between text comprehension and second language incidental vocabulary acquisition: A matter of topic familiarity? Language Learning, 54(3), 469-523.
Roorda, D. L., Jak, S., Zee, M., Oort, F. J., & Koomen, H. M. (2017). Effective teacher–student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement. School Psychology Review, 46(3), 239-261.
Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2018). Autonomous language learning through a mobile application: a user evaluation of the busuu app. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 854-881.
Scharle, A., Szabó, A., & Szabó, A. (2000). Learner autonomy: A guide to developing learner responsibility. Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363.
Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (2020). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge university press.
Shohamy, E. (2020). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. Routledge.
Smith, R. (2008). Learner autonomy. ELT Journal, 62(4), 395-397.
So, S. (2016). Mobile instant messaging support for teaching and learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 32-42.
Suryawati, E., & Osman, K. (2017). Contextual learning: Innovative approach towards the development of students’ scientific attitude and natural science performance. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 61-76.
Teng, F. (2014a). Research into practice: Strategies for teaching and learning vocabulary. Beyond Words, 2(2), 41–57.
Teng, F. (2014b). Strategies for teaching and learning vocabulary. Beyond Words, 2(2), 40-56.
Teng, F. (2015). The effectiveness of extensive reading on EFL learners’ vocabulary learning: Incidental versus intentional learning. BELT-Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 6(1), 66-80.
Turner, K., & McCarthy, V. L. (2017). Stress and anxiety among nursing students: A review of intervention strategies in the literature between 2009 and 2015. Nurse Education in Practice, 22, 21-29.
Van Esch, K., & St John, O. (2003). A framework for freedom: Learner autonomy in foreign language teacher education. Peter Lang Publishing.
Webb, S. (2008). The effects of context on incidental vocabulary learning. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 232-245.
Woldeab, D., & Brothen, T. (2019). 21st-century assessment: Online proctoring, test anxiety, and student performance. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 34(1), 1-10.
