مدل‌سازی رهبری برنامه درسی برای مدیران مدارس ایران
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی
ناهید فضلی
1
(دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران.)
علی خلخالی
2
(دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران.)
نادر نادری
3
(استادیار گروه مدیریت و کارآفرینی، دانشکده اقتصاد و کارآفرینی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران.)
جواد سلیمانپور
4
(استادیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، واحد تنکابن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تنکابن، ایران.)
کلید واژه: برنامه درسی, نظریه داده بنیاد, مدیران مدارس, رهبری برنامه درسی,
چکیده مقاله :
رهبری برنامه درسی به‌عنوان جزء کلیدی بهبود نظام آموزشی شناخته شده و با نظر به نقش حیاتی مدیران در این بخش، پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی الگویی برای رهبری برنامه درسی توسط مدیران انجام شده است. رویکرد حاکم بر پژوهش، کیفی از روش داده بنیاد بود. جامعه مورد مطالعه شامل اعضای هیئت‌علمی، کارشناسان مدیریت آموزشی و متخصصان برنامه درسی و مدیران مدارس است. روش نمونه گیری به شیوه نظری بوده است. حجم نمونه به روش اشباع داده ها صورت پدیرفت. با 19 نفر مصاحبه به عمل آمد. داده های حاصل از مصاحبه در بخش کیفی از طریق کدگذاری باز، محوری و انتخابی، تجزیه و تحلیل، و در بخش کمی با آزمون فریدمن اولویت بندی شدند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که عوامل علی (شامل ضرورت شکل‌گیری اهداف کلان آموزش‌وپرورش، نیاز به بهبود مستمر در فرآیند آموزش‌وپرورش و ضرورت اجرای برنامه درسی اثربخش) زمینه ساز رهبری برنامه درسی توسط مدیران است که تمرکززدایی در نظام آموزش‌وپرورش، تبیین جایگاه مدیران به‌عنوان رهبران برنامه درسی، انتصاب مدیران شایسته و توانمندسازی آنان، همکاری مدیران با معلمان، هوشیارسازی دانش آموزان و اولیاء نسبت به برنامه درسی، جلب همکاری فراسازمانی، بازسازی فرهنگ، غنی‌سازی برنامه های درسی و پایش منظم اجرای آن به عنوان راهبردهای توسعه رهبری برنامه درسی مدیران، موجب بروز پیامدهای فردی، سازمانی و اجتماعی می گردد.
Curriculum leadership is recognized as a key component of improving the education system. Considering the vital role of principals in this sector, the present study was conducted with the aim of designing a model for curriculum leadership by head master. The approach that was taken in this research included a combination of sequential-exploratory type which was used in the qualitative part of the Grounded Theory method and in the quantitative part of the descriptive-survey method. The community studied includes faculty members, educational management experts, curriculum specialists, and head master. The data from the interviews in the qualitative section were analyzed by open, axial and selective coding and prioritized in the quantitative section with Friedman's test. The results showed that causal factors (including the need to form macro goals of education, the need for continuous improvement in the process of education and the need to implement an effective curriculum) are the basis of curriculum leadership by head master, which focuses on decentralize the education system, explaining the position of headmaster as curriculum leaders, appointing qualified head master and empowering them, cooperation of head master with teachers, awareness of students and parents about the curriculum, attracting extra-organizational cooperation, renewal of culture and Curriculum enrichment and regular monitoring of its implementation as a strategy for developing leadership curriculum head master, It causes individual, organizational and social consequences.
Abolhassani, Z., & Safaei Movahed, S. (2019). providing a proposed framework for the work and technology curriculum of the middel school With emphasis on flipped classroom pattern, Research in Curriculum Planning, 16 (34), 1-13. ( In Persian)
Agrawal, T. (2012). Vocational education and training in India: challenges, status and labour market outcomes. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 64(4), 453-474.
Albashiry, N.M., Voogt, J.M., & Pieters, J.M. (2016). Curriculum leadership in action: A tale of four community college heads of department leading a curriculum development project, Community College journal of research and Practice, 40 (5), 401–413.
Avizhgan, M., Mirshahjafari, E., Nasr, A. R., & changiz, T. (2014). How do faculty members see the role of curriculum leadership in graduate school? A qualitative study, STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 11 (2), 153-169. (Persian)
Bazargan, A. (2008). Introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods, Didar, Tehran.
Burton N., Middlewood D. (2001). Managing the Curriculum. 7 ed. California: Sage Publications Ltd.
Cao, X., & Yang, Y. (2019). Rural Tourism" New Villagers" Makers under the Guidance of" Homesickness"—Rural Tourism Entrepreneurship Motivation Model based on Grounded Theory. International Conference on Economics, Management and Humanities Science (ECOMHS 2019).
Corbin, J., & Struss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria, Qualitative Sociology, 13 (1), 3-21.
Hallinger, P., & Chen, J. (2015). Review of research on educational leadership and management in Asia: A comparative analysis of research topics and methods, 1995–2012, Educational management administration & leadership, 43 (1), 5-27.
Khalkhali, A. (2016). Curriculum Leader, School Management Growth, 15 (1), 8-10. (In Persian)
Koskei, K. K. (2015). Assessment of Stakeholders’ Influence on Curriculum Development Process in Secondary Schools in Kericho County, Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 3 (20), 79-87.
Kufi, E. F. (2013). The Role of Different Stakeholders in Ethiopia in the Improvement of Educational Quality, International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 1 (2), 11-24.
Lavonen, J. (2017). Governance decentralisation in education: Finnish innovation in education, Journal of Distance Education, 1 (53), 1-22.
Lin, T. B., & Chen, P. (2018). The Inception of a Curriculum Leadership Development Program in Taiwan: Rationales and Designs, Chinese Education & Society, 51(5), 324-336.
Maleki, H., Abbaspoor, A., Salmani, B., Hakimzadeh, R., & Taimoori, M. H. A. (2018). A Model for Leadership Curriculum in the Early Iran Course, Curriculum Studies, 13 (48). 5-38. ( In Persian)
Martin, K. W. (2018). Exploring Curriculum Leadership Capacity-Building Through Biogrphical Narrative: A Currere Case Study (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University).
Martin, P. Y., & Turner, B. A. (1986). Grounded theory and organizational research. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22 (2), 141-157.
McGrath, S., Needham, S., Papier, J., Wedekind, V., Attwal, H., Calitz, M., & Van Der Merwe, T. (2010). Employability in the college sector: A comparative study of England and South Africa. British Council: Department for Business Innovation and Skills. London.
Mestry, R., Moonsammy-Koopasammy, I., & Schmidt, M. (2013). The instructional leadership role of primary school principals, Education as Change, 17(sup1), S49-S64.
Najafi, S., & Maroofi, Y. (2020). Explaining Barriers of Acceptance and Implementation of Innovation in Farhangian University Curriculum, Research in Curriculum Planning, 16 (37), 61-76. (In Persian)
Preedy, M. (2002). Managing the Curriculum for Student Learning.
Republic of South Africa (RSA). (2016). South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA). SAQA Bulletin, 15 (1), March 2016. Pretoria: SAQA.
Rostami, F., Aliabadi, V., Popzan, A. H. (2014). Sustainability modeling in agro-family farming systems based on mixed cultivation based on basic theory (Case study: Firoozan section), Iranian Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development Research, 45 (2), 373-382. ( In Persian)
Salavati, P., Maleki, H., & Sohrabi, F. (2020). Content analysis of first year high school social studies textbooks based on national curriculum content indicators, Research in Curriculum Planning, 16 (37), 178-187. (In Persian)
Schwella, E. (2008). Administrative reform as adaptive challenge: Selected public leadership implications. Politeia, 27 (2), 25-50.
Skinner, L. A., Stiffler, D., Swigonski, N., Casavan, K., Irby, A., & Turman Jr, J. E. (2019). Grassroots Maternal Child Health Leadership Curriculum, ENGAGE! Co-created Knowledge Serving the City, 1 (1), 64-77.
Terblanche, T. E. D. P. (2017). Technical and vocational education and training (TVET) colleges in South Africa: A framework for leading curriculum change (Doctoral dissertation, Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University).
Terblanche, T., & Bitzer, E. (2018). Leading curriculum change in South African technical and vocational education and training colleges, Journal of Vocational, Adult and Continuing Education and Training, 1(1), 104-104.
Tian, M., & Risku, M. (2019). A distributed leadership perspective on the Finnish curriculum reform 2014, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 229-244.
Tingle, E., Corrales, A., & Peters, M. L. (2019). Leadership development programs: Investing in school principals, Educational Studies, 45 (1), 1-16.
Verrett, S. L. (2012). Gender Perceptions of Administrative Team Members Regarding Secondary Principals' Leadership Actions and Behaviors in Managing Change.
Wedekind, V. (2008). Report on the research on further education and training (FET) colleges in South Africa. Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Wiles, J. (2009). Leading curriculum development, Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Yaro, I., Arshad, R., & Salleh, D. (2016). Education Stakeholder’s Constraints in Policy Decisions for Effective Policy Implementation in Nigeria, British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 1 (14), 1-12.
Zainabadi, H., & Asadzadeh, S. (2013). The quality of leadership culture of teachers' curriculum and professionalism: Findings of a small study in primary schools in Tehran. (In Persian)
_||_