تاریخ‌نگاری تحول دانش معلمان طی چهار دهه اخیر

محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی

نسرین نصرتی ¹ , مصطفی قادری ² , فائزه ناطقی ³

1 - دکترای برنامه‌ریزی درسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اراک، اراک، ایران.
2 - دانشیار دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران.
3 - دانشیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اراک، اراک، ایران.

تاریخ دریافت : 1395/06/02 تاریخ پذیرش : 1398/03/01 تاریخ انتشار : 1398/07/01

کلید واژه: معلم پژوهنده, دانش معلمان, معلم ژرف‌نگر, دانش ضروری معلمان, معلم روایتگر,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف این مطالعه، درک روند تاریخی دانش معلمان در چهار دهه گذشته است. برای این کار مقالات و کتب پژوهشگران دانش معلمان در طی دهه‌های 80 تا 2010 میلادی از طریق فرا تحلیل مورد مطالعه قرارگرفته است. برای این منظور مقالات و کتاب‌های در دسترس و شاخص دانش معلمان مربوط به سیزده پژوهشگر برتر حوزه دانش معلمان در طی چهار دهه اخیر به‌عنوان اسناد شاخص مورد تحلیل قرارگرفته‌اند. مدل‌ها و الگوهای دانش معلمی برحسب زمان در چهار دهه تقسیم‌بندی و برحسب زمان مورد تحلیل اسنادی قرارگرفته‌اند. روند تاریخی دانش معلمان نشان می‌دهد که مطالعات دانش معلمان در دهه 80 به سمت دانش عملی معلمان، در دهه 90 به سمت دانش ضروری معلمان و در دهه 2000 به سمت تولید دانش توسط خود معلمان و در سال‌های اخیر (2000 به بعد) مدل‌های دانش معلمان به سمت مدل‌های ترکیبی دانش عملی، دانش ضروری و پژوهش‌های معلمان تغییر کرده است. مهم‌ترین مفاهیم موردبررسی در دانش معلمان به ترتیب سیر تاریخی عبارت‌اند از: معلم ژرف‌نگر یا کار اندیش، معلم روایتگر، معلم پژوهنده، معلم حرفه‌ای و معلم متخصص.

چکیده انگلیسی:

This research investigates the chronology of teacher’s knowledge during last 4 decades. In this regard, the related through meta-analysis articles and researchers teachers knowledge textbooks during 1980-2010 have been studied. Chronological procedure of teacher knowledge show the teachers knowledge studies have been encountered great change toward teacher practical knowledge, teachers essential knowledge and knowledge production during 80th, 90th and 2000 decades, respectively. The most important concepts examined on teacher’s knowledge chronologically include: deliberate teacher, Narrator teacher, researcher teacher, skillful teacher and expert teacher.

منابع و مأخذ:

Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge.Handbook of research on science education. p. 1105-1149.

Abell, S.K. (2008). Twenty years later: Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? Inter­national Journal of Science Education, 30 (10), 1405-1416.

Acevedo, J. A. (2009). Conocimiento didáctico del contenido para la enseñanza de la naturaleza de la ciencia (I): el Marco teórico (Pedagogical Content Knowledge for teaching the nature of science (I): the theoretical framework). Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 6 (1), 21-46.

Banks, F., Leach, J., & Moon, B. (2005). Extract from “New understandings of teachers’pedagogic know­ledge”. Curriculum Journal, 16 (3), 331–340.

Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical Context Knowledge: Toward a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Teacher Education, 84 (4), 426-453.

Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999).Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content know­ledge. In: Gess-Newsome, J., & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). Examining pedagogical content know­ledge: the construct and its implications for science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Klu­wer Academic Publishers, 147-161.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989).Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32–42.

Bucat, R. (2005). Implications of chemistry education research for teaching practice:

 

Pedagogical content knowledge as a way forward. Chemistry Education International, 6 (1), 1–2.

Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Hand­book of educational psychology. New York: Macmillan, 709–725.

Carmen FERNANDEZ. Knowledge Base for Teaching and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): Some Useful Models and Implica­tions for Teachers’ Trainingproblems of education in the 21st century Volume 60, 2014 98 ISSN 1822-7864.

Carter, K. (1990). Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach.In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of Re­search on Teacher Education. New York: Macmillan, 291–310.

Clark, C., & Peterson, P. L. (1986). Teachers´ thought processes. In: M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Teaching, 3rd Ed., New York: Macmillan, 255-296.

Cochran, F. K.; DeRuiter, J. A.; & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: An integrative mo­del for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 261–272.

Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1985). Personal practical knowledge and the modes of knowing: Re­levance for teaching and learning. In: E. Eisner (Ed.), Learning and teaching the ways of knowing. Chicago: University of Chicago, 174–198.

De Jong, O., Veal, W. R., & Van Driel, J. H. (2002). Exploring chemistry Teachers’ Knowledge Base In: Gilberty, J.K.; De Jong, O.; Justi, R.; Treagust, J.; Van Driel, J. HChemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 369-390.

Elbaz, F. (1983).Teacher thinking.A study of practical knowledge. Londres: Croomhelm.

Eraut, M. (1994).Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer.

Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: the nature of knowledge in research on tea­ching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 3-56.

Fernandez, C. (2013). PCK - Conhecimento Pedagógico do Conteúdo: perspectivas e possibilidades para a formação de professores PCK - Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Prospects and possibilities for teacher training. In: VIIIEncontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências – EN­PEC, 2011, Campinas, SP. Atas do VIII ENPEC – I CIEC 2011. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: ABRAPEC, 2013. v. 1. p. 1-12. Retrieve 3/05/2014, from: http://www.nutes.ufrj.br/abrapec/viiienpec/resu­mos/R0370-1.pdf.

Fernández-Balboa, J. M., & Stiehl, J. (1995).The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11 (3), 293–306.

Freire, P. (1985). Pedagogia do Oprimido (Pedagogy of the Oppressed). Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Paz e Terra, 256p.

Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogia da autonomia: saberes necessários à prática educativa (Pedagogy of autono­my: knowledge necessary for educational practice). São Paulo: Paz e Terra.

Friedrichsen, P., Van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2010).Taking a closer look at science teaching orienta­tions. Science Education, 358-376.

Gauthier, C. (1998). Por uma teoria da pedagogia: pesquisas contemporâneas sobre o saber (For a theory of pedagogy: contemporary research on knowledge), 1998. Unijui: Ed. da UNIJUI.

Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical Content knowledge: an introduction and orientation. In: Gess-Newsome, J.; Lederman, N.G. (Eds.) Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 3-17.

Gess-Newsome, J., & Carlson J. (2013).The PCK summit consensus model and definition of pedagogi­cal content knowledge. In: The Symposium “Reports from the Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Summit, ESERAConference 2013, September, 2013.

Girotto, Jr. G., & Fernandez, C. (2013). Following early career chemistry teachers: The development of Pedagogical Content Knowledge from pre-service to a professional teacher. Problems of Educa­tion in the 21st Century, 55, 57-73.

Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.

Grossman, P. L. (1994). Teacher knowledge. In: Husen, T.; Postlethwaite, T. N. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd Ed.). London: Pergamon Press.

Helmes, J., & Stokes, L. (2013). Ameeting of minds around Pedagogical Content Knowledge: desi­gning an international PCK summit for professional, community, and field development. Retrieve 8/05/2014, from: http://www.inverness-research.org/reports/2013-05_Rpt-PCK-Summit-Eval-final_03-2013.pdf.

Henze, I., Van Driel. J., & Verloop, N. (2007).Science teachers’ knowledge about teaching models and modelling in the context of a new syllabus on public understanding of science. Research in Sci­ence Education, 37, 99–122.

Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: Perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45 (2), 169-204.

Koballa, T. R., Gräber, W., Coleman, D., & Kemp, A. C. (1999). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of the knowledge base for teaching chemistry at the gymnasium. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10 (4), 269–286.

Loughran, J. J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers‘ pedago­gical content knowledge. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R.; & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers‘ pedagogical content knowledge through PaPeRs. Research in Science Education, 31 (2), 289-307.

Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2004). In search of pedagogical content knowledge in science: developing ways of articulating and documenting professional practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (4), 370-391.

Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008).Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science tea­cher education. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (10), 1301-1320.

Magnusson, S., Krajick, J., & Borko, H. (1999).Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In: Gess-Newsome, J.; Lederman, N. G. (Org.), Examining ped­agogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 95-132.

Magnusson, S.; Krajcik, J.; & Borko, H. (1999).Nature, sources and development of pedagogical con­tent knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome; N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education, Boston: Kluwer, 95-132.

Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (3), 3–11.

Montenegro, V. L. S. (2011). Processo reflexivo e o desenvolvimento do Conhecimento Pedagógico do Conteúdo: análise a partir de uma intervenção na formação contínua de professores de quími­ca (Reflective process and Pedagogical Content Knowledge development: analysis from an in-service chemistry teacher workshop). 2011, 270f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ensino de Ciên­cias) - Instituto de Física, Instituto de Química, Instituto de Biociências, Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. Retrieved 3/05/2014, from http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/81/81132/tde-14062012-115507/pt-br.php

Montero, L. (2001). La construción del conocimiento en la enseñanza. In: Marcelo, C. (Ed.) La función docente (The teaching role). Madrid: Ed. Síntesis, 47-83.

Morine-Dershimer, G., & Kent, T. (1999).The complex nature and sources of teachers´ pedagogical knowledge. In: Gess-Newsome, J.; Lederman, N.G. (Eds.) Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 21-50.

Nilsson, P. (2008). Teaching for understanding: The complex nature of pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service education. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (10), 1281-1299.

Nilsson, P. (2009). From lesson plan to new comprehension: Exploring student teachers’ pedagogical reasoning in learning about teaching. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32, 239–258.

Oliveira-Jr., M. M. (2011). Flashes das disciplinas de formação inicial no repertório profissional de licen­ciandos em química. (Flashes of initial training courses in professional repertoire of pre-service chemistry teachers) 2011, 194 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ensino de Ciências) - Instituto de Fí­sica, Instituto de Química, Instituto de Biociências, Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. Retrieved 2/06/2014, from http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/81/81132/tde-30052012-145050/pt-br.php

Park, S., & Oliver, S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261-284.

Pereira, P. G. E. M., Fernandez, C. (2013). Indícios do modelo integrativo no desenvolvimento do PCK em licenciandos em química durante o estágio supervisionado. (Evidence of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in chemistry student teachers during pre-service training) Revista de Educación de las Ciencias, 14, 74-78.

Pimenta, S. G. (org). (1997). Saberes pedagógicos e atividade docente (Pedagogical knowledge and tea­ching activity). 6ª Ed. São Paulo: Cortez, 2008, 248p.

Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In: Biddle, B.; Good, T.; Goodson, I. International Handbook of Teachers and Teaching. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1223-1296.

Rollnick, M., Bennett, J., Rhemtula, N. D., & Ndlovu, T. (2008). The place of subject matter knowledge in pedagogical content knowledge: Acase study of South African teachers teaching the amount of substance and chemical equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (10), 1365-1387.

Salazar, S. F. (2005). El conocimiento pedagógico del contenido como categoría de estudio de la forma­ción docente (The pedagogical content knowledge as a category of study of teacher education). Actualidades investigativas en educación, 5 (2). Retrieved 2/06/2014 from: http://revista.inie.ucr.ac.cr/

Sales, M. G. P. (2010). Investigando o conhecimento pedagógico do conteúdo sobre “soluções” de uma professora de Química (Inquiring the pedagogical content knowledge about “solutions” of a chemistry teacher). 2010, 253 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ensino de Ciências) Instituto de Físi­ca, Instituto de Química, Instituto de Biociências, Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. Retrieved 3/06/2014, from http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/81/81132/tde-21022011-155615/pt-br.php

Schön, D. A. (1992). La formación de professionals reflexivos. Hacia un Nuevo diseño de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje en las profesiones (The formation of reflective professionals). Barcelona: Paidós/MEC, 1992.

Shimahara, N. K. (1998). The Japanese model of professional development: Teaching as craft. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 451–462.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15 (4), 4-14.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of a new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), p. 1-22.

Shulman, L. S., Sykes, G. (1986). Anational board for teaching?In search of a bold standard.Areport for the task force on teaching as a profession. Carnegie Corporation, New York.

Silva, A. N. (2012). Um professor de Química e dois contextos escolares: o conhecimento pedagógico do conteúdo em ação (A chemistry teacher and two scholar contexts: the pedagogical content knowledge in action). 154f. Dissertação (Mestrado) apresentada ao Instituto de Física, Instituto de Química, Instituto de Biociências e à Faculdade de Educação, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Retrieved 3/06/2014, from http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/81/81132/tde-25022013-132509/pt-br.php

Talanquer, V. (2004). Formación docente: Qué conocimiento distingue a los buenos maestros de química? (Teacher training: What knowledge distinguishes good teachers of chemistry?) Revista Educación Química, 15 (1), 60-66.

Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4 (2), 99-110.

Tardif, M. (2002).Saberes docentes e formação profissional (Teacher Knowledge and training teachers). 12ª Ed., Petrópolis (SP): Vozes.

Veal, W. R., & Makinster, J. G. (1998).Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, Retrieved 3/04/2012, from http://unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/vealmak.html

Verloop, N., Van Driel, J., & Meijer, P. (2001).Teacher knowledge and the knowledge base of teaching. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 441–461.

Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing: representations of knowledge in teaching. In: Calderhead, J. (Ed.) Exploring teachers´ thinking. London: Cassell Educational.