تبیین سازگاری و مسیر گذر چارچوب مطلوب عناصر برنامه درسی آموزش کارآفرینی در آموزش عالی از ایدئولوژی‌های برنامه درسی اسکایرو
محورهای موضوعی : پژوهش در برنامه ریزی درسی
احمد ملکی پور
1
(
دکتری برنامه‌ریزی درسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
)
سید محمد علی میر جلیلی
2
(
استادیار دانشگاه فرهنگیان پردیس دکتر شریعتی، مازندران، ایران.
)
معصومه مقیمی فیروز آباد
3
(
عضو هیئت‌علمی مرکز نسیبه دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران.
)
کلید واژه: آموزش عالی, برنامه درسی, ایدئولوژی‌های برنامه درسی, آموزش کارآفرینی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف این پژوهش، تبیین سازگاری و مسیر گذر چارچوب مطلوب عناصر برنامه درسی آموزش کارآفرینی در آموزش عالی از ایدئولوژی‌های برنامه درسی اسکایرو است. این تحقیق از نظر ماهیت آمیخته، از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از نظر روش گردآوری اطلاعات توصیفی- استنتاجی و تحلیل محتوا به شمار می‌رود. ابزار جمع‌آوری اطلاعات چک‌لیست تحلیل محتوا برای انطباق با جداول شش‌گانه اسکایرو (2008) در کتاب نظریه‌های برنامه درسی: دیدگاه‌های متضاد و نگرانی‌های مداوم اثر است، در بخش کمی نیز از نمودار و فرم رتبه‌بندی اقتباس شده از اسکایرو (2008) برای تعیین مسیر برنامه درسی آموزش کارآفرینی در آموزش عالی استفاده شد. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که مسیر گذر چارچوب مطلوب عناصر برنامه درسی آموزش کارآفرینی در آموزش عالی در عنصر هدف برنامه درسی از مسیر کارایی اجتماعی و عناصر دیگر برنامه درسی شامل؛ محتوا، روش تدریس، فراگیر، یادگیری و ارزشیابی نیز از مسیر یادگیرنده محور تبیین می‌گردد؛ بنابراین می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که اساتید، مؤلفان و طراحان برنامه درسی آموزش کارآفرینی برای دستیابی و کاربست چارچوب مطلوب عناصر برنامه درسی آموزش کارآفرینی در آموزش عالی باید دیدگاه خود را در عنصر هدف با ایدئولوژی برنامه درسی کارایی اجتماعی و در عناصر محتوا، روش تدریس، فراگیر، یادگیری و ارزشیابی با ایدئولوژی برنامه درسی یادگیرنده محور تطبیق دهند.
The objective of this research is to explain adaptability and pathway of optimal framework of curriculum elements of entrepreneurship education in the higher education based upon Schiro's curriculum ideologies. This is a synthetic (quantitative and qualitative) study that using In terms of target, the method of collecting information is descriptive-deductive and content analysis. Data gathering tools is Checklist for content analysis to adapt to six tables from Schiro (2008) in Curriculum Theory: Conflicting Visions and Enduring Concerns. The results illustrated that pathway of optimal framework of curriculum elements of entrepreneurship education in higher education are explained in goal element to Social Efficiency Ideology and Goal elements, content, teaching method, individual, learning and evaluation of Learner Centered pathway. Therefore, faculty, authors and designers of entrepreneurship education curriculum for achievement and application of optimal framework of curriculum elements of entrepreneurship education in higher education must be implemented considering their viewin goal element to Social Efficiency Ideology and in Goal elements, content, teaching method, individual, learning and evaluation to Learner Centered Ideology.
Bechard, J., & Toulouse, J. (1998). Validation of a didactic model for the analysis of training objectives in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4): 317-332.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Available at: www.ericdigests.org/1992-4/active.htm.
Cotti, R., & Schiro, M. (2004). Connecting teacher beliefs to the use of children’s literature in the teaching of mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(4): 329-356.
Dana, L.P. (2001), “The education and training of entrepreneurs in Asia”, Education Training, 43(8): 405-16.
EC-European Commission. (2008). Entrepreneurship in higher education, especially within non-business studies. Final Report of the Expert Group, Brussels, Belgium.
Elyasi, M., Ferastkhah, M., (2012) The skills of entrepreneurship educators and educators to nurture new entrepreneurs in universities. Journal of entrepreneurship. 4(15): 185-218. [Persian]
Ernest, K., Matthew, S. K., & Samuel, A. K. (2015). Towards Entrepreneurial Learning Competencies: The Perspective of Built Environment Students. Higher Education Studies, 5(1): 20.
European Commission (2008). Entrepreneurship education in higher education, especially within non-business studies. Final report of the expect group. Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General. Brussels, Belgium.
Farahani, A. goudarzi, M. Azizian Kohan, N. Ahmadi. A. (2009). The Investigation of the Role of Syllabus and Content of Lessons in the Entrepreneurship of Graduate Physical Education Students. 1(1): 203-223. [Persian]
Garavan, T. N., & O’Cinneide, B. (1994). Entrepreneurship Education and Training Programmes:: A Review and Evaluation – Part 2. Journal of European Industrial Training, 18(11); 13–21.
Ghina, A., Simatupang, T. M., & Gustomo, A. (2014). “A Systematic Framework for Entrepreneurship Education within a University Context”. International Education Studies, 7(12): pp. 1-19.
Gholi, Z., Mghtadi, M. (2008). A Study of the Dimensions Entrepreneurship Development Project. Resaerch in Curriculum Planning, 19(22): 96-76. [Persian]
Gibb AA (1987). Enterprise cultur – Its meaning and implication for education and training Journal of European Industrial Training 1(2): 78-92.
Gibb, A. (1990). Entrepreneurship and small business management: Can we afford to neglect them in the twenty-first century business school? British Academy of Management.
Gibb, A. (2002). In pursuit of a new enterprise and ‘entrepreneurship paradigm for learning: creative destruction, new values, new ways of doing things and new combinations of knowledge. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(3): 233-269.
Günzel-Jensen, F., Robinson, S., & Robinson, S. (2017). “Effectuation in the undergraduate classroom: Three barriers to entrepreneurial learning”. Education+ Training, 59(7/8): 780-796.
Harris, M.L., Gibson, S.G. (2008). Examining the entrepreneurial attitudes of US business students. Education + Training, 50(7): 568-81.
Kent, Calvin A. (1990). Entrepreneurship Education: Current Developments, Future Directions. New York: Quorum Books, 1990.
Kiessling, T. (2004). Entrepreneurship and Innovation: Austrian School of Economics to Schumpeter to Drucker to Now. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 9(1): 80-91.
Labinowicz, L. (2004). What is active learning. Available at: http/www.education.nsala.edu / vivalry/what.htm.
Lackeus, M. (2015). Entrepreneurship in education: What, why, when, how. Entrepreneurship 360. Background Paper. Paris: OECD.
Lewis, K., & Massey, C. (2003). Delivering enterprise education in New Zealand. Education+ Training, 45(4): 197-206.
LiuDezhi, L., Hong. W. (2008). A Comparative Study for Entrepreneurial Education in China-US Universities. International Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Wismar: Wismar University. September 14-17.
Malekipour, A. Hakimzadeh, R. Dehghani, M. Zali, M. (2016). A Comparative Study of Entrepreneurship Curriculum for Undergraduate Programs of Social and Behavioral Sciences in the University of Tehran and Pioneer Universities of the World. Journal of Research and writing of academic books. 20 (38). 89-113. [Persian]
McKenna, S. (2004). Predispositions and context in the development of managerial skills. The Journal of Management Development, 23(7/8): 664-677.
Moberg, K., Stenberg, E., & Vestergaard, L. (2012). Impact of entrepreneurship education in Denmark-2012. Odense, Denmark: The Danish Foundation for Entrepreneurship–Young Enterprise.
Null, W. (2011). curriculum form theory to practice. Published by Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Potishuk, V., & Kratzer, J. (2017). “Factors Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention and entrepreneurship attitudes in higher education”. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 20(1): pp. 44-25.
Rahmanpour, M., Mirghsem, H., Nasresfahani, H. (2016). The amount of observance the scientific principles in codification the goals of curriculum in Graduate Studies (Case Study: Isfahan University). Resaerch in Curriculum Planning, 2(48): 56-69. [Persian]
Robertson, M., Collins, A., Wilson, K. and Lyewllyn, D. (2003), “Embedding entrepreneurial studies across the curriculum paper”, paper presented at the 26th National Institute for Small Business &Entrepreneurship Conference: SME’s in the Knowledge Economy.
Safari, S., Samizadeh, M., (2012). The Need for Knowledge and Entrepreneurship Skills Training in Humanities. Journal of education technology, 7(1): 76-66. [Persian]
Sang, M. L., Daesung, C. (2005). Impact of Entrepreneurship Education: A Comparative Study of the U.S. and Korea. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 1(1): 27-43.
Schiro, M. (1978). Curriculum for better schools: The great ideological debate. Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
Schiro, M. (1992). Educators’ perceptions of changes in their curriculum belief systems over time. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7 (3): 250–286.
Schiro, M. (2004). Oral storytelling and teaching mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Schiro, M. (2008). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. (Translator: Fermaheini Frahani, Mohsen), Tehran: Ayeg publications.
Schiro, M. (2008). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. Los Angeles/ London: SAGE.
Schiro, M., & Fabrizio, M. (2007). Real-time diagrammatic Monte Carlo for nonequilibrium quantum transport. Physical Review B, 79(15): 153302.
Sharif, Seyyed Mostafa Jamshidian, Abdolrasoul. Rahimi, Hamid, and Naderi, Nahid (2012) Analysis of the Situation of Entrepreneurship Education in Iran's Higher Education. Entrepreneurship Development, Third Year, No. 11, pp. 106-8779. (Persian)
Stevenson, H. H., & Jarillo, J. C. (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11(5): 17-27.
Terpstra, D. E., & Rozell, E. J. (1993). The relationship of staffing practices to organizational level measures of performance. Personnel psychology, 46(1): 27-48.
Vesper, K. H., & Gartner, W. B. (1997). Measuring progress in entrepreneurship education. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(7): 403–421.
Zhou, M & Haixia Xu (2012). A Review of Entrepreneurship Education for College Students in China. Adm. Sci.7 (2): 82-98.
_||_