Reflection of Pragmatic Knowledge in Iranian High School English Textbooks (Vision Series)
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy
Fateme Jamshidian
1
(
English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
)
Omid Tabatabaei
2
(
English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
)
Hadi Salehi
3
(
English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
)
Hossein Vahid Dastjerdi
4
(
English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Iranian high school English textbooks, Iranian culture, Vision Series, Halliday’s (1973) model, Pragmatic Knowledge, Sociocultural knowledge,
چکیده مقاله :
Pragmatic competence is an essential language pedagogy component represented in English textbooks. The paper attempts to examine the extent to which pragmatic knowledge was reflected in Iranian high school English textbooks (Vision series). Hence, Halliday’s (1973) model and Halliday, et al.’s (1964) model were used to investigate subcategories of functional knowledge and sociolinguistic knowledge. The data was described by descriptive statistics. The findings revealed the Iranian culture-deprived representation (e.g., traditional customs, and ceremonies such as Nowruz, Chaharshanbesori, and Yalda). Moreover, the results highlighted only a limited number of pragmatic components implicitly introduced in the Vision series, and attention was given to their representation and problematic distribution. Furthermore, the English sociocultural patterns were limited and attempts were made to reflect the Iranian culture and convection of daily communication. Thus, some pedagogical implications were offered to improve the Vision series, using authentic pragmatic content instead of proclaiming the fictitious prescription of its authors.
Aldera, A. S. (2017). Teaching EFL in Saudi Arabian context: Textbooks and culture. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(2), 221.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2010). Exploring the pragmatics of interlanguage pragmatics: Definition by design. In A. Trosborg (Ed.), Pragmatics Across Languages and Cultures (pp. 219-260). De Gruyter Mouton.
Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study-abroad context. Amesterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.
Barron, A. (2020). Developing pragmatic competence in a study abroad context. In K. P. Schneider & E.Infantidau (Eds.), Developmental and clinical pragmatics (pp. 429-474). De Gruyter Mouton Publication. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110431056
Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ELT Journal, 59(3), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci039
Gheitasi, M., Aliakbari, M., & Yousofi, N. (2020). Evaluation of culture representation in Vision English textbook series for Iranian secondary public education. Evaluation, 12(26), 145-173.
Halliday, M. (Eds.). (1973). Relevant models of language in M. Halliday explorations in the functions of language. New York: Elsevier North-Holland
Halliday, M. A. K., MacIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1970). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press.
Hamdani, B. (2021). Pragmatic competence among EFL learners. Proceedings of the International English Language Teachers and Lecturers (iNELTAL). http://ineltal.um.ac.id/.
House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 225-252.
House, J. (2008). What is an ‘intercultural speaker’?. In E. A, Soler & M. P. S. Jorda (Eds.), Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 7-21). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5639-0
Hussein, N. O., Albakri, I. S. M. A., & Seng, G. H. (2020). Developing undergraduate EFL students’ communicative competence through using pragmatic instruction. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 5(1), 232-238. https://dx.doi.org/10.22161/ijels.51.42
Hymes, D. (1972). Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Hymes, D. (Eds.). (1972). On communicative competence. En JB Pride y J. Holmes Sociolinguistics. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 69-89. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315225593
Kang-Young, L. (2009). Treating culture: What 11 high school EFL conversation textbooks in South Korea do. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 8(1), 76-96.
Kayapinar, U. (2009). Coursebook evaluation by English teachers. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 69-79.
Khajavi, Y., & Abbasian, R. (2011). English language teaching, national identity and globalization in Iran: The case of public schools. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(10), 181-186.
Khomeijani Farahani, A. A., Borzabadi Farahani, D., & Bazarmaj Haghi, E. A. (2021). An investigation of macro and micro politeness strategies in Iranian junior and senior high schools' English textbooks. Foreign Language Research Journal, 11(4), 655-681.
Lee, S. M. (2013). The development of evaluation theories for foreign language textbooks. school textbooks facilitate the development of intercultural pragmatic competence? RELC Journal, 42(1), 17-30.
Malmir, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Identity processing styles as predictors of L2 pragmatic knowledge and performance: A case of common English speech acts. Journal of Language Horizons, 4(2), 187-209.
McConachy, T. (2018). Critically engaging with cultural representations in foreign language textbooks. Intercultural Education, 29(1), 77-88.
Organization of research and educational planning, (2018). Vision1 English for school. Tehran: Textbook Publishing Company of Iran.
Organization of research and educational planning, (2018). Vision2 English for school. Tehran: Textbook Publishing Company of Iran.
Organization of research and educational planning, (2018). Vision3 English for school. Tehran: Textbook Publishing Company of Iran.
Qari, I. (2021) Evaluation of pragmatic information in an English textbook: Focus on requests. International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences, 15(1), 138-142.
Rostami, F. (2021, March). Culture in Iranian non-native high school English textbooks versus native institutes English textbooks. Retrieved from https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2916-8053
Salehi, H. & Khosravi, K. (2017). Evaluation of newly developed Iranian EFL textbook, the Vision 1. Unpublished master's thesis, Najafabad University, Najafabad, Iran.
Savignon, S. J. (2018). Communicative competence. In J. I. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, (pp. 1-7). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0047
T.T.M. (2011). Learning to communicate in a globalized world: To what extent do school textbooks facilitate the development of intercultural pragmatic competence? RELC Journal, 42 (1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210390265
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied linguistics, 4(2), 91-112.
Tran, T. M. T., & Yeh, A. (2020). Keeping it real: Vietnamese-English pragmatic representations in EFL Textbook. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 2(1), 1-20.
Xiao, F. (2015). Proficiency effect on L2 pragmatic competence. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 557-581. https://doi.org/10.14746/sllt.2015.5.4.3
Zaferanieh, E., & Hosseini-Maasoum, S. M. (2015). Pragmatic representations in Iranian high school English textbooks. Journal of English Language Pedagogy and Practice, 8(16), 187-198.
