The Role of Extensive Listening Tasks in the Use of Discourse Markers by Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners in their Oral Production of Stories
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy
Mahboobeh Abedi
1
,
Abbas Bayat
2
,
Hossein Ahmadi
3
1 - Department of English Language, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
2 - Department of English Language, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
کلید واژه: Speaking Skill, Extensive Listening, Discourse markers, Intermediate EFL Learners,
چکیده مقاله :
Speaking is challenging for EFL learners as it calls for grammatical competence and discourse knowledge, including Discourse Markers (DM), which help them speak naturally. This study sought to investigate the effect of extensive listening tasks on the use of DMs in speaking by Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Sixty intermediate EFL learners were randomly assigned into two experimental and control groups. The participants' oral production was checked in the two groups before the treatment, and the frequency and types of DMs were detected. For the treatment, the participants in the experimental group were required to listen to different short stories as part of out-of-class activities for three months. However, the control group did not receive extensive listening tasks. A posttest was administered only one day after the last treatment session to realize the impact of the treatment on the participants' use of DMs. After four weeks, a delayed posttest was administered to examine the participants' long-term DM use. The data collected from the posttest and delayed posttest were then analyzed using independent paired samples t-tests. The findings indicated that extensive listening tasks did not impact the use of DMs in speaking by Iranian EFL learners at the intermediate level. The results of the delayed posttest did not yield any significant difference either.
Asim Rai, M., Farahat, J., & Arif, S. (2011). A corpus-based study of discourse markers in British and Pakistani speech. International Journal of Language Studies, 5(4), 69 –86.
Burns, A., & Joyce, H. (1997). Focus on speaking. National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.
Chang, A. C-S., Millett, S., & Renandya, W. A. (2018). Developing listening fluency through supported extensive listening practice. RELC Journal, 49(3),1 –17. https://doi:10.1177/0033688217751468
Celce-Murcia, M. (2014). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Heinle & Heinle.
Davatgari-Asl, H. & Moradinejad, A. (2016). The effect of explicit instruction of discourse markers on Iranian EFL learners' speaking ability. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(5), 190 –202.
De Klerk, V. (2005). Towards a corpus of Black South African English. Southern African Journal of Linguistics & Applied Language Studies, 20(1-2), 25–35. https://doi: 10.2989/16073610209486296
Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-instruction in language learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2012). Discourse interpretation: Approaches and Applications. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ellis, R. (2012). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Ellis, R. & Shintani, N. (2013). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge
Farahani, M. V., & Ghane, Z. (2022). Unpacking discourse markers' function(s) in academic spoken English: A corpus-based study. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 45, 49 –70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00005-3
Fatalaki, J. A., Amini, E., & Mirzaee, M. (2014). The role of explicit interactive metadiscourse markers" instruction in Iranian EAP learners" reading comprehension. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics, 1(2), 14 –24.
Fuller, J. M. (2003). The influence of speaker role on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(1), 23 –45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00065-6
Fung, L., & Carter, R. (2007). Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 410–439 https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm030
Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Routledge
Hellermann, J., & Vergun, A. (2007). Language which is not taught: The discourse marker uses of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.04.008
Holden, W. R. (2008). Extensive listening: A new approach to an old problem. Journal of the Faculty of Humanities, University of Toyama, 49, 299 –312.
Ivone, F. M. & Renandya, W. A. (2019). Extensive listening and viewing in ELT. TEFLIN Journal, 30(2), 237–256. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v30i2/237-256
Jafarinejad, R. & Tavakoli, M. (2011). Investigating the relationship between discourse markers, language proficiency, and reading comprehension: A case of some Iranian university students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 1526–1530
Khandaghi-Khameneh, A. & Fakhraee-Faruji, L. (2020). Teaching discourse markers (DMs) affect speaking achievement among Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Research in English Education, 5(4), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.29252/ijree.5.4.1
Kizil, A. Ş (2021). Discourse markers in learner speech: A Corpus-based comparative study. Journal of Language Education and Research, 7(1), 1–16.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
Liao, S. (20009). Variation in the use of discourse markers by Chinese teaching assistants in the US. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(7), 1313 –1328. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.09.026
Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie and T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413 – 468). Academic Press.
Maftoon. P. (2015). Carroll's autonomous induction theory: Combining views from UG and information processing theories., Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(2), 423–428, https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0602.24
Martín-Laguna, S., & Alcón-Soler, E. (2018). Developing discourse-pragmatic markers in a multilingual classroom: A mixed method research approach. System, 75, 68–80. https://doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.03.009
Masrai, A. (2020). Can L2 phonological vocabulary knowledge and listening comprehension be developed through extensive movie viewing? The case of Arab EFL learners. International Journal of Listening, 34(1), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2019.1582346
McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second-language learning. Edward Arnold.
Moghadasi, M. E, Bavali M., & Behjat, F. (2020). How does explicit and implicit instruction of formal meta-discourse markers affect learners' oral production. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 10(3), 67–81.
Nejadansari, D., & Mohammadi, A. M. (2015). The frequencies and functions of discourse markers in the Iranian university EFL classroom discourse. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(2), 3–20.
Pons Bordería, S. & Portolés, J. (2008). Diccionario de partículas discursivas del español (DPDE). http://www.dpde.es
Quirk, R. (1955 Portolés). Colloquial English and communication. In B. Evans (ed.) Studies in Communication. Secker and Warburg.
Rahayu, T., Aziz, M., Permatasari, I., Sutantohadi, A., & Widodo, Y. H. (2021). Discourse markers in EFL student presentations. The First International Conference on Economics, Business, and Social Humanities, Madiun, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-11-2020.2304554
Rajabi, P., & Salami, S. N. (2016). Gap-fillers instruction and Iranian intermediate EFL learners' speaking performance. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(1), 78–85.
Renandya, W. A. & Farrell, T. S. (2011). 'Teacher, the tape is too fast!' Extensive listening in ELT. ELT Journal, 65(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq015
Sadeghi, B., & Ramezan Yarandi, M. R. (2014). Analytical study on the relationship between discourse markers and speaking fluency of Iranian EFL students. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 2(2), 101–123.
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press.
Shabani, M.B., & Goljani, S. (2015). Enhancing discourse markers awareness among Iranian EFL learners: A product-process based view. Teaching English Language, 9(2), 97–122.
Swain, M. (1995) Three output functions in second language learning. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (eds) Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125-44). Oxford University Press.
Torres, L. (2006). Bilingual discourse markets in indigenous languages. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(5), 615–624. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb383.0
Waring, R. (2008). Starting an extensive listening program. Extensive Reading in Japan, 1(1), 7–10.
Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. (2009). The lexical coverage of movies. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 407–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp010
Wenden, A. L. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 32–55.
White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and developing second language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/8.2.95
Yazdizadeh, Z., Shakibaei G., & Namaziandost, E. (2020). Investigating the relationship between Iranian undergraduate TEFL learners' self-regulation and self-efficacy. International Journal of Research in English Education (IJREE), 5(3), 12–23. https://ijreeonline.com/article-1-308-en.html
Zhang, S. (2009). The role of input, interaction, and output in developing oral fluency, English Language Teaching, 2(4), 91–100, https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n4p91.
Zhang, M. (2016). A multidimensional analysis of metadiscourse markers across written registers. Discourse Studies, 18(2), 204-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445615623907
