Task-Based Speaking Assessment in an EFL Academic Context: A Case of Summative and Formative Assessment
محورهای موضوعی : Research in English Language Pedagogy
Reza Bagheri Nevisi
1
(Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of humanities, University of Qom, Qom, Iran)
Rasoul Mohammad Hosseinpur
2
(Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of humanities, University of Qom, Qom, Iran)
کلید واژه: Formative Assessment, Range, Summative assessment, Pronunciation, coherence,
چکیده مقاله :
Consistent with the paradigm shift in language assessment from psychometrics to educational assessment, from an examination culture to an assessment culture, the present study was an attempt to compare and contrast the two forms of speaking assessment: Summative and formative and to see how much consistency existed between the two. To this end, 46 undergraduate Iranian EFL students participated in the study. To achieve the formative assessment, some pedagogic speaking tasks were designed and EFL learners’ speaking abilities were assessed over a three-month period based on pre-determined criteria. As for the summative assessment, a semi-structured interview was conducted at the end of the course, and learners’ performances were assessed by two different raters based on the same criteria. To analyze the data, descriptive statistics, MANOVA, and Pearson correlation were utilized. The results indicated a significant agreement between formative assessment of the first-rater and summative assessment of the second-rater. The findings revealed that from both formative and summative perspectives, pronunciation posed the least challenge whereas coherence and range presented the greatest difficulty to EFL language learners. The study implies that the formative and summative assessment procedures will have to be integrated within classroom settings with more emphasis on the former.
Alexander, L. G. (1968). For and against. Longman Publications.
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L. (2004). Statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge University Press.
Bachman, L. & Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford University Press.
Black, P. J., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box. Raising standards through classroom assessment. King’s College.
Brindley, G. (2013). Task-based assessment. In. C. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, (pp. 1-6). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1141
Bygate, M. (2016). Sources, developments, and directions of task-based language teaching. The Language Learning Journal, 44(4), 381-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2015.1039566
Clarke, S (1998). Targeting assessment in the primary school. Hodder and Stoughton.
Brown, H. D. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Longman.
Brown, J. D. (2004). Understanding research in second language teaching: A teacher’s guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge University Press.
Chapelle, C. A., & Brindley, G. (2010). Assessment. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (pp. 247-267). Hodder Education.
Gipps, V. C. (1994). Beyond testing. Farmer Press.
Harris, P. D. (1987). Testing English as a second language. Hill Book Company.
Heaton, J. B. (1989). Writing English language tests. Longman.
Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Huxham, M., Campbell, F., & Westwood, J. (2012). Oral versus written assessments: A test of student performance and attitudes. Journal of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(1), 125-136.
Jafarpur, A. (1994). A Course in language testing: Payame-Noor University Press.
Jones, J. (2005). Developing effective formative assessment practices in the primary modern foreign language (MFL) classroom. Encuentro, 15, 39-47.
Knight, B. (1992). Assessing speaking skills: A workshop for teacher development. ELT Journal, 46(3), 294-302.
Long, M. (2015). Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley- Blackwell.
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge University Press.
Madsen, S. H. (1983). Techniques in testing. Oxford University Press.
McCarthy, M. & O’Dell, F. (2013). English vocabulary in use. Cambridge University Press.
McNamara, T. & Hill, K. (2011). Developing a comprehensive, empirically-based research framework for classroom-based assessment. Language Testing, 29(3), 395-420. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211428317
Norris, J. (2016). Current uses for task-based language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 230-244.
Richards, J. C. & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge University Press.
Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77-84.
Shehadeh, A. (2012). Task-based language assessment: Components, development, and implementation. The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Assessment, 4, 156-163.
Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment. Teaching, learning, and assessment in the classroom. Open University Press.
Tuan, L. (2012). Teaching and assessing speaking performance through the analytic scoring approach. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4), 673-679.
Underhill, N. (1987). Testing spoken language: A handbook of oral testing techniques. Cambridge University Press
Weaver, C. (2012). Incorporating a formative assessment cycle into task-based language teaching in a university setting in Japan. In A. Shehadeh & C. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation, 287-309. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.4.17wea
Wigglesworth, G. & Frost, K. (2017). Task and performance-based assessment. In E. Shohamy, S. May, & I. Or. (Eds.), Language testing and assessment: Third edition. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 121-130). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02261-1_8
Weir, J. C. (1990). Communicative language testing. Prentice Hall
