بررسی توسعه صنعتی شهر تهران و ارزیابی پیامدهای اجتماعی آن از دیدگاه شهروندان
محورهای موضوعی : آلودگی هوا
عباس نوروززاده مغانلو
1
(
دانشجوی دکتری جغرافيا، واحد لارستان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي، لارستان، ایران.
)
مرضیه موغلی
2
(
دانشيار گروه جغرافيا، واحد لارستان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي، لارستان، ایران. * (مسوول مکاتبات)
)
احمد علی خرم بخت
3
(
استادیارگروه جغرافيا، واحد لارستان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامي، لارستان، ایران
)
کلید واژه: توسعه صنعتی, اثرات اجتماعی, شهر تهران.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: توسعه چه در مقیاسی کوچک باشد و چه در سطحی وسیع اجرا شود، تغییراتی را در اجتماع محلی ایجاد میکند و تأثیر مستقیمی بر روی زندگی مردم دارد. اقدامات توسعهای زمانی به اهداف خود دست مییابند که جنبههای اجتماعی در کنار ملاحظات اقتصادی قرار گیرند. به این ترتیب هدف اصلی پژوهش حاضر بررسی تأثیرات اجتماعی توسعه صنعتی تهران در ابعاد مختلف میباشد.
روش بررسی: روش تحقیق این پژوهش با توجه به ماهیت و اهداف آن، توصیفی – تحلیلی و یک بررسی کاربردی است. برای بررسی فرضیات تحقیق از روش آماری t تک نمونه ای و همچنین برای وزن دهی ابعاد از متد AHP و نرم افزار Expert choice، استفاده شد. جامعه آماري اين پژوهش در بخش پيمايشي، تمامي شهروندان بالاي ١٨ سال ساكن در شهر تهران بود. حجم نمونه آماري پژوهش (384نفر) با استفاده از فرمول کوکران به صورت تصادفی ساده تعیین و به تناسب جمعیت مورد بررسی قرار گرفت.
یافته ها: یافته های پژوهش بر اساس تحلیل آزمون t تک نمونهای نشان داده شد که از 6 بعد مورد بررسی مربوط به شاخص اجتماعی اثرات توسعه صنعتی، 4 بعد آلودگی محیط زیست (59/3)، حاشیه نشنی (41/3)، اسکان غیررسمی (48/3) و مصرف گرایی (38/3) به دلیل آنکه مقدار میانگین شان بیشتر از 3 (حد وسط) و سطح معناداری کمتر 05/0 بوده از توسعه صنعتی متاثر شده و با توسعه صنعتی رابطه معناداری دارند اما دو بعد دیگر نابرابری اجتماعی و شهرنشینی به دلیل بزرگتر بودن سطح معناداریشان از 05/0 دارای رابطه معناداری با توسعه صنعتی نیستند.
بحث و نتیجه گیری: توسعه صنعتی در تهران باعث افزایش مهاجرت، حاشیه‌نشینی، آسیبهای اجتماعی، آلودگی محیط زیست و افزایش جرم و جنایت در بخش‌های حاشیه‌نشینی شهر تهران شده است.
Background and Objective: The increase in industrial activities and the dispersion of interdependent industries in unfavorable climatic situations have caused environmental problems and issues on the other hand, it can be considered a serious obstacle to sustainable production in industries. The purpose of this research is Interpretive ranking appraisal of ecological drivers of sustainable production in the oil industry.
Material and Methodology: This research, which is considered developmental and mixed in terms of methodology, tried to identify the ecological drivers of sustainable production in the oil industry by relying on Meta-synthesis analysis and Delphi processes in the qualitative part of the research. Then, in the quantitative part, interpretive ranking analysis will be used to identify the most effective ecological driver of sustainable production in oil industry. The participant in the qualitative section was 14 specialists and experts in the field of industrial management at the university level and in the quantitative part, the participation of 23 managers and the experts was used from the management level of the development center in the National Iranian Oil Company, who had experience both in terms of knowledge and experience. The results of the research in the qualitative part after the content screening of 14 confirmed studies indicated the existence of 6 ecological drivers of sustainable production in the oil industry.
Findings: The results in the quantitative part of the research showed that, from the sum of the overall effectiveness based on the paired scale between the research components, it was determined that the percentage of influence of the stimulus, ecological, climatic and environmental positioning is higher than the rest of the ecological stimuli of sustainable production in the oil industry.
Discussion and Conclusion: The obtained result expresses the fact that ecological positioning in terms of climate and environment helps the oil industry by bringing together companies active in this field, while preventing the dispersion of industrial companies, at the same time can by evaluating the soil; Plant and animal diversity and other environmental aspects prevent the erosion of natural resources and environmental pollution.
1. Firouzabadi, Seyed Ahmed, Danesh Mehr, Hossein and Ali Nejad, Karim. (2017). industrialization and social and environmental consequences; Analyzing residents' narratives about the Mahabad Petrochemical Project. Quarterly Journal of Social-Cultural Development Studies, 6 (4), 35-62. (In Persian)
2. Azkia, Mustafa, Ahmadresh, Rashid and Danesh Mehr, Hossein. (2012). New paradigm development and controversies. Tehran: Kia publishing house. (In Persian)
3. 3.Burdge, R. J. (2004). The benefits of social impact assessment for developing countries. The concepts, process and methods of social impact assessment: Rabel J. Burdge and colleagues, 11 (22), 245-254.
4. Ramezani Kiasaj Mahalle, Roya, Amiri, Mohammad Javad and Zabal, Labat. (2018). Assessing the social effects of development plans on local communities, case study: Chamkhale port construction plan. Geography and Development, 56, 232-215. (In Persian)
5. Tawakkul, Mohammad and Nowzari, Hamzah. (2011). Analysis of the economic, social and environmental effects of the Parsian gas refinery industry on rural areas (case study: rural areas of Moher city in Fars province). Social Studies and Research in Iran, 1 (4), 48-29. (In Persian)
6. Nobakht, Reza, Fathi, Soroush and Karimian, Habib Elah. (2013). The effect of industrial settlements on socio-economic development in Iran (case study of Masjid Sulaiman nomadic area). Iranian Journal of Social Development Studies, 7 (1), 111-126. (In Persian)
7. Mertl, J & Valenčík, R. (2016). The socioeconomic consequences of industrial development. Central European Journal of Management. 3 (1), 37-45.
8. Hoque, A., Mohiuddin, M., & Su. Z. (2018). Effects of Industrial Operations on Socio-Environmental and Public Health Degradation: Evidence from a Least Developing Country (LDC). Sustainability, 10 (11), 1-22.
9. Rinku, D., & Kumar, A. (2011). Industrial Clusters: An Approach for Rural Development in North East India. International Journal of Trade Economics and Finance, 2 (2), 161-165
10. Schindler, J., Graef, F. & König, H. J. (2016). Participatory impact assessment: Bridging the gap between scientists' theory and farmers' practice. Agricultural Systems, 148 (2), (2016) 38-43.
11. Norouzzadeh, Abbas, Moghli, Marzieh and Khorram Bakht, Ahmad Ali. (2021). Investigating the environmental and social impact of industrial development (case study: Tehran). Environmental Science and Technology, 22(5), 113-124. (In Persian)
12. Terrapon-Pfaff, J., Finka, T., Viebahna, B & Jamea, E. l. (2017). Determining significance in social impact assessments (SIA) by applying both technical and participatory approaches: Methodology development and application in a case study of the concentrated solar power plant NOORO I in Morocco. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 66 (3), 138-150.
13. EARTHTIME INC. (2009). Environmental & Social Impact Assessment. Buchanan Renewables Fuel. 1-303.
14. Karmi, Gholamhossein and Rezaei Moghaddam, Koresh. (2013). Social impact assessment: a new approach in sustainable management of development programs. Socio-Cultural Development Studies Quarterly, 4(2), 169-194. (In Persian)
15. Dendena, B., & Corsi, S. (2015). The Environmental and Social Impact Assessment: a further step towards an integrated assessment process. Journal of cleaner production, 108 (1), 965-977.
16. Basu, P. & Guariglia, A. (2004). Inequality and industrialization. Paper presented at the Midwest Macroeconomics Conference, Ames, USA.
17. Minh Pham, T. Kondor, I., Hanel, R, & Thurner, S. (2020). The effect of social balance on social fragmentation. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 17 (172), 1-10.
18. Rashidi, Ali. (2000). industrial development of Iran; Past experience and future horizon. Political-Economic Information, 5 (14), 195-186. (In Persian)
19. Pourahmad, Ahmed and Fallahian, Nahid. (2005). Investigating the process of formation of industrial axes around the city of Tehran with an emphasis on the Karaj-Qazvin axis. Geographical Research, 3, 173-192. (In Persian)
20. Riyazi, Abolhassan. (2010). The influence of modernity on the spatial organization of the city of Tehran at the end of the Qajar period. Cultural Research, 3 (3), 129-148. (In Persian)
21. Mehdizadeh, Javad. (2002). City and history: a comment on the historical process of physical and spatial development of the city of Tehran (the second part, modernization and emergence of the mother city of Tehran). Urbanization Essays, 3, 16-26. (In Persian)
