From Evaluation to Development: Designing Effective English Writing Materials for University German Language Students
محورهای موضوعی : آموزش زبان انگلیسی
Leila Rahmani
1
,
Kourosh Akef
2
,
Mehrdad Rezaee
3
1 - Department of English Language, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of English language, CT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, CT.C., Islamic Azad University,Tehran, Iran,
کلید واژه: course book evaluation, EFL, material development, needs analysis, writing proficiency,
چکیده مقاله :
Writing remains one of the most challenging skills for EFL/ESL learners, including university students, who often struggle with vocabulary, grammar, cohesion, and coherence in academic contexts. This study addresses the persistent challenge of improving writing skills among university students in learning English as foreign language (EFL) contexts, where commercial course books often fail to meet learners’ academic and professional needs. Using an exploratory mixed-method design, the researcher first conducted a needs analysis through questionnaires and interviews with 62 German language students at an Iranian university. Based on the findings, a new set of writing materials was designed and piloted with an experimental group, while the control group used the standard course book. Pre- and post-test results, analyzed through independent-samples t-tests, revealed significant improvement in the experimental group, confirming the effectiveness of the needs-based materials. The study contributes to EFL material development by highlighting the pedagogical value of contextually relevant resources in enhancing writing proficiency. The findings offer practical implications for EFL/ESP teachers, syllabus designers, and policymakers seeking to improve L2 writing instruction. The findings and implication of the study also would be fruitful for the L2 teachers not only in English language area, but also in other fields of study like German language.
Writing remains one of the most challenging skills for EFL/ESL learners, including university students, who often struggle with vocabulary, grammar, cohesion, and coherence in academic contexts. This study addresses the persistent challenge of improving writing skills among university students in learning English as foreign language (EFL) contexts, where commercial course books often fail to meet learners’ academic and professional needs. Using an exploratory mixed-method design, the researcher first conducted a needs analysis through questionnaires and interviews with 62 German language students at an Iranian university. Based on the findings, a new set of writing materials was designed and piloted with an experimental group, while the control group used the standard course book. Pre- and post-test results, analyzed through independent-samples t-tests, revealed significant improvement in the experimental group, confirming the effectiveness of the needs-based materials. The study contributes to EFL material development by highlighting the pedagogical value of contextually relevant resources in enhancing writing proficiency. The findings offer practical implications for EFL/ESP teachers, syllabus designers, and policymakers seeking to improve L2 writing instruction. The findings and implication of the study also would be fruitful for the L2 teachers not only in English language area, but also in other fields of study like German language.
Akbar Alkodimi, K., & Mohammed Hassan Al-Ahdal, A. A. (2021). Strategies of teaching writing at Saudi tertiary-level institutions: Reality and expectations. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 12. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.27
Aalaei, N., Ahmadi-Azad, Sh., & Nazari Bagha, K. (2025). Comparing the Impact of Homogeneous Versus Heterogeneous Pairing Types on Iranian High and Low Proficiency EFL Learners’ Writing Accuracy and Fluency. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 14(3), 2025, pp. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.82531/202506251210309
Awada, G., Burston, J., & Ghannage, R. (2020). Effect of student team achievement division through WebQuest on EFL students’ argumentative writing skills and their instructors’ perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 275-300. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1558254
Bai, B., Wang, J., & Nie, Y. (2021). Self-efficacy, task values and growth mindset: what has the most predictive power for primary school students’ self-regulated learning in English writing and writing competence in an Asian Confucian cultural context?. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(1), 65-84.
Baleghizadeh, S. (2019). Materials development for English language teachers: a practical guide. Tehran, The organization for researching and composing university textbooks in the humanities (SAMT), Institute for research and development in the humanities.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Briesmaster, M., & Etchegaray, P. (2017). Coherence and cohesion in EFL students’ writing production: The impact of a metacognition-based intervention. Íkala, revista de lenguaje y cultura, 22(2), 183-202. https://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n02a02
Fakir, S. A., Ajmal, M., Masum, R., Mudhsh, B. A., Alam, S., & Banu, S. (2025). LLMs as Effective Localised Materials for English Language Learners: A Comprehensive Framework. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(3), 975-985. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1603.28
Farshi, S. S., & Safa, S. K. (2015). The effect of two types of corrective feedback on EFL learners’ writing skill. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1), 26-30. https://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.26
Gaunt, H., & Treacy, D. S. (2020). Ensemble practices in the arts: A reflective matrix to enhance team work and collaborative learning in higher education. Arts and humanities in higher education, 19(4), 419-444. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474022219885791
Kaskani Aliki, Zafiri Makrina-Nina, Dimogeronta Panagiota, (2021), “A Needs AnalysisQuestionnaire: Designing and Evaluation”, Journal of English Literature and Language; 2(1): 1-9.
(1) (PDF) A Needs Analysis Questionnaire: Designing and Evaluation. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350688817_A_Needs_Analysis_Questionnaire_Designing_and_Evaluation [accessed Feb 25 2024].
Kardena, A., Syarif, H., & Zaim, M. (2020). Analysis of students’ point of view regarding to writing skill at English education section of IAIN Bukittinggi. In 2nd International Conference Innovation in Education (IcoIE 2020) (pp. 62-67). Atlantis Press.
Khan, A., Rafique, S., & Khalid, S. (2024). Evaluation of the federal English textbook of grade one of federal schools in Pakistan. Journal of Applied Linguistics and TESOL (JALT), 7(4), 70-84.
Kirn, E., Hartmann, P., Carver, T. B., & Sullivan, A. (2002). Interactions 2: Reading. McGraw-Hill.
McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and methods in ELT (3rd ed.). UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Miekley, J. (2005). ESL textbook evaluation checklist. The reading matrix, 5(2).
Moon, Y., Choi, J., & Kang, Y. (2019). Does reading and vocabulary knowledge of advanced korean efl learners facilitate their writing performance?. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.1.10.149
Munawar, S., & Chaudhary, A. H. (2019). Effect of Cooperative Learning on the Writing Skill at Elementary Level in the Subject of English. Bulletin of education and research, 41(3), 35-44.
Nasr, M., & Namaziandost, E. (2019). The impact of topic choice on descriptive writing ability among Iranian advanced EFL learners. International Journal of English Language Studies, 1(1), 9-16.
Negretti, R. (2012). Metacognition in student academic writing: A longitudinal study of metacognitive awareness and its relation to task perception, self-regulation, and evaluation of performance. Written Communication, 29(2), 142-179.
Nomoto, T. (2022). Keyword extraction: a modern perspective. SN Computer Science, 4(1), 92.
Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus design. Oxford University Press.
Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading &Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222
Rahmatipasand, S. Z., Afraz, S., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2022). Iranian EFL Learners’ Writing Problems: Developing a Context-Sensitive Framework to Practice Writing. Foreign Language Research Journal, 12(1), 49-73. https://dx.doi.org/10.34785/J014.2022.551
Rashtchi, M. (2020). A survey on prospect series (1, 2, 3) teacher's guide. Roshd FLT Journal, 34(2), 34-43.
Ratminingsih, N. M., Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., & Vigayanti, L. P. D. (2018). Self-Assessment: The Effect on Students’ Independence and Writing Competence. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 277-290. https://dx.doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11320a
Singh, A. S. (2017). Common procedures for development, validity and reliability of a questionnaire. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 5(5), 790-801.
Tasheva, N. (2024). The Role of Interactive Methods in Teaching English. Modern Science and Research, 3(1), 12-18.
Tahmouresi, S., & Papi, M. (2021). Future selves, enjoyment and anxiety as predictors of L2 writing achievement. Journal of Second Language Writing, 53, 100837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100837
Taye, T., & Mengesha, M. (2024). Identifying and analyzing common English writing challenges among regular undergraduate students. Heliyon, 10(17).
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.) (2011). Materials development for language teaching (2nd ed.). CUP.
Vakilifard, A., & Ahmadi Khalkhali, N. (2021). Teaching Persian for Academic Purposes: Evaluating the Textbook of Nabz-e Zendegi (Pulse of Life) for International Students Based on Miekley’s Checklist. Pizhuhish nāmah-i intiqādī-i mutūn va barnāmah hā-yi ̒ulūm-i insāni. Critical Studies in Texts & Programs of Human Sciences, 21(1), 335-358.
