رابطه مسئولیت پذیری اجتماعی با تعهد سازمانی در بین کارکنان ادارات تعاون ، کار و رفاه اجتماعی استان آذربایجان غربی
محورهای موضوعی : جامعه شناسیماریا جعفرزاده 1 , محمود علمی 2 , داود ابراهیم پور 3 , مهران صمدی 4
1 - دانشجوی دکتری جامعه¬شناسی، گروه علوم اجتماعی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران.
2 - گروه جامعه¬شناسی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران (نویسنده مسئول).
3 - گروه جامعه¬شناسی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران.
4 - گروه ارتباطات اجتماعی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران.
کلید واژه: مسولیت پذیری اجتماعی , تعهد سازمانی , استان آذربایجان غربی,
چکیده مقاله :
این مطالعه با هدف تعیین رابطه ابعاد مسئولیتپذیری اجتماعی با تعهد سازمانی در بین کارکنان ادارات تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی استان آذربایجانغربی انجام پذیرفته است. جامعه آماری، کارکنان ادارات تعاون، کار و رفاه اجتماعی استان آذربایجانغربی که تعداد آنها برابر ۲۳۶ نفر بود. بر اساس فرمول کوکران، حجم نمونه ۱۴۶ نفر تعیین شد. شیوه انتخاب نمونه، نمونهگیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای (بر حسب محل خدمت و جنسیت) بود. روش تحقیق پیمایش و ابزار جمعآوری دادهها پرسشنامههای استاندارد و محقق ساخته بود. بر اساس یافتهها، میانگین متغیر مسئولیتپذیری اجتماعی برابر 8/73 انحراف استاندارد 68/14 و متغیر تعهد سازمانی کارکنان 95/48 و انحراف استاندارد 98/9 بود. نتایج به دست آمده نشان دادکه بین میزان مسئولیت- پذیری اجتماعی کارکنان با تعهد سازمانی آنان رابطه معنیدار وجود ندارد، اما بین بعد اجتماعی و بعد اخلاقی مسئولیتپذیری اجتماعی کارکنان با تعهد سازمانی آنان رابطه مثبت و معنیدار وجود دارد. همچنین بین بعد اقتصادی و بعد قانونی مسئولیتپذیری اجتماعی کارکنان با تعهد سازمانی آنان رابطه معنیدار وجود نداشت.
This study was conducted with the aim of determining the relationship between the dimensions of social responsibility and organizational commitment among employees of cooperative, labor and social welfare departments of West Azerbaijan province. The statistical population was employees of cooperative, labor and social welfare departments of West Azerbaijan province, who were 236 people. Based on the Cochran formula, the sample size was determined as 146 people. The sample selection method was stratified random sampling (based on place of service and gender). The research method was a survey and the data collection tool were standard and researcher-made questionnaires. Based on the findings, the mean of the social responsibility variable was 8.73 with a standard deviation of 14.68 and the organizational commitment variable of employees was 95.48 with a standard deviation of 9.98. The results showed that, there is no significant relationship between the level of social responsibility of employees and their organizational commitment, but there is a positive and significant relationship between the social and ethical dimensions of social responsibility of employees and their organizational commitment. Also, there was no significant relationship between the economic and legal dimensions of social responsibility of employees and their organizational commitment
. Amini, Amir Mozafar; Hamadani, Ali; Zainal, Ramazani. (2008). Evaluation of the most important intra-organizational components in the success of Tehran poultry cooperatives, Quarterly Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies and Natural Resources, Year. 12, Issue. 43, P.p: 285-295.
2. Aron, Raymond. (2007). Basic Stages of Thought in Sociology, Translated by: Baqer Parham, Tehran, Islamic Revolution Publications and Education Organization.
3. Carroll, A. B. (1991). “The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders”, Business Horizons, 34 (4), P.p: 39-48.
4. French, Savard. (1991). Culture of Management, Translated by: Hamd Saebi, Public Administration Training Center, Tehran, Volume. 1.
5. Ghodrati, Karim. (2015). Investigating Social Factors Related to Social Responsibility of Tabriz Metropolitan Municipality Employees, Master's Thesis, Islamic Azad University of Tabriz.
6. Kakabadse, Andrew. and Kalu, N. (2009). Real citizens and social responsibility, Cranfield University, UK and Auburn University, US, published by Palgrave Macmillan Palgrave Macmillan in the US is a division of St Martin’s Press LLC, New York.
7. Kakabadse, Andrew. and Kalu, N. (2009). Citizenship A Reality Far from Ideal, Cranfield University, UK and Auburn University, US, published by Palgrave Macmillan palgrave, New York.
8. Khoshbin, Yousef. (2011). Social Responsibility of Youth and Social and Cultural Factors Affecting It, Quarterly Journal of Social Sciences, Issue. 59.
9. Royaei, Ramazan Ali, Mehrdost, Hossein. (2009). Investigating the Role of Cultural Managers in Promoting Social Responsibility (Case Study of Single- Post Managers of the Iranian Broadcasting Corporation), Social Sciences Research Letter, Year. 3, Fall, Issue. 3, P.p: 44-59.
10. Koser, Louis. (2008). Life and Thought of Sociological Greats, Translated by: Mohsen Salasi, Tehran: Scientific Publications.
11. Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Miller, Seumas. (2004). Social Action: A Teleological Account, Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
13. Mortazavi, Saeed; Pour- Azad, Naser; Sadeghi Moghadam, Masoumeh; Amir Razavi, Pegah. (2011). Investigating the Moderating Role of the Variable Importance of Social Responsibility on the Relationship Between Social Responsibility and Organizational Commitment; Case Study: Food Industry Companies in Mashhad, Journal of Social Sciences of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Fall- Winter 2011, Issue. 2, (16th Consecutive Edition).
14. Salehi Omran, Ebrahim; Sabeti, Abdolhamid; Hassan Zadeh, Sodabeh. (2012). Quarterly Journal of the Iranian Higher Education Association, Year. 4, Issue. 2, Spring.
15. Sobhani Nejad, M. and Fardanesh, E. (2000) Social Responsibility in the Current Curriculum of the Iranian Primary School, Modares Journal, Volume. 4, Issue. 1, Spring 2000.
16. Tavasoli, Gholam Abbas. (2006). Sociological Theories, Tehran: Samt Publications.
