The Role of Vision Ignition in Enhancing Motivated Cognition, Emotion, and Behavior of ADHD Adolescents Involved in Online English Learning

محورهای موضوعی :

Amir Arsalan Sharifi ¹ , Hossein Heidari Tabrizi ² , Azizeh Chalak ³

1 - Department of English, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of English, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Department of English, Isfahan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1402/06/04 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/07/03 تاریخ انتشار : 1403/12/22

کلید واژه: ADHD, EFL learners, motivation, online learning, vision,

چکیده مقاله :

Learners with ADHD, even those adapted to online instructional regulations, readily become frustrated with the typical tenor of instruction and, as a result, may stray from the core learning content. The current mixed-methods study explored how manipulating these learners into envisaging their ideal L2 selves could avoid motivational pitfalls in their way to L2 learning, affecting their motivated cognition, emotion, and behavior. Based on the motivational paradigm proposed by You and Dörnyei, a multifaceted construct, including the future L2 selves, L2 learning experience, and intended effort, was compared between an experimental and a control group of Iranian EFL learners. The comparison of the multifaceted construct, measured by a standard Likert-scale questionnaire, revealed significant between-group differences in the overall motivational construct and the ideal L2 self. Nonetheless, the significant raises in the learners’ overall motivation and cognitive motivation failed to be reflected significantly in their emotional states and motivated behavior. Further analysis through interview and checklist data revealed that the intervention realized some success in improving the short-lived learning experiences of the learners. The findings may offer new insights to the broad range of practitioners eager to help learners with neurodevelopmental disabilities in today’s remotely-managed globe.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Learners with ADHD, even those adapted to online instructional regulations, readily become frustrated with the typical tenor of instruction and, as a result, may stray from the core learning content. The current mixed-methods study explored how manipulating these learners into envisaging their ideal L2 selves could avoid motivational pitfalls in their way to L2 learning, affecting their motivated cognition, emotion, and behavior. Based on the motivational paradigm proposed by You and Dörnyei, a multifaceted construct, including the future L2 selves, L2 learning experience, and intended effort, was compared between an experimental and a control group of Iranian EFL learners. The comparison of the multifaceted construct, measured by a standard Likert-scale questionnaire, revealed significant between-group differences in the overall motivational construct and the ideal L2 self. Nonetheless, the significant raises in the learners’ overall motivation and cognitive motivation failed to be reflected significantly in their emotional states and motivated behavior. Further analysis through interview and checklist data revealed that the intervention realized some success in improving the short-lived learning experiences of the learners. The findings may offer new insights to the broad range of practitioners eager to help learners with neurodevelopmental disabilities in today’s remotely-managed globe.

منابع و مأخذ:

Al-Murtadha, M. (2018). Enhancing EFL learners’ willingness to communicate with visualization and goal-setting ac-tivities. TESOL Quarterly, 53(1), 133-157. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.474
Al-Shehri, A. S. (2009). Motivation and vi-sion: The relation between the ideal L2 self, imagination, and visual style. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity, and the L2 self (pp. 164-171). Multilingual Matters
Azarnoosh, M., &Birjandi, P. (2012). Junior high school students’ L2 motivational self-system: Any gender differences? World Applied Sciences Journal, 20(4), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.20. 04.2732.
Burns, E., & Martin, A. J. (2014). ADHD and adaptability: The roles of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional regulation. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 24(2), 227- 242. https://doi.org/10.1017/jgc.2014.17
Çelik, Ö., & Lancaster, T. (2021). Violations of and threats to academic integrity in online English language teaching. The Literacy Trek, 7(1), 34-54. https://doi.org/10.47216/literacytrek.932316
Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R. W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41(4), 469-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1991.tb00690.x
Csizér, K. & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. Modern Language Journal, 89(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00263.x
Csizér, K., &Kormos, J. (2009). Learning experiences, selves and motivated learning behaviour: A comparative analysis of structural models for Hungarian secondary and university learners of English. In Z. Dörnyei, & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 98-119). Multilingual Matters.
Dattalo, P. (2013). Analysis of multiple de-pendent variables. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199773596.001.0001
Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. Language Teaching, 31, 117-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026144480001315X
Dörnyei Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in secondlanguage acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self-system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Multilingual Matters
Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Motivation in second language learning. In M. Celce-Murcia, D. M. Brinton, & M. A. Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (4th ed.) (pp.518-531). National Geographic Learning/Cengage Learning.
Dörnyei, Z., & Chan, L. (2013). Motivation and vision: An analysis of future L2 self-images, sensory style, and imagery capacity across two target languages. Language Learning, 63(3), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12005
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (2013). Teaching and Researching Motivation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351006743
Giannopoulou, M. (2019). Academic self-regulation on students with attention deficit disorder with or without hyperactivity: Parents’ and educators’ point of view. Open Journal of Social Science, 7(8), 97-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jss.2019.78008.
Higgins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.319
Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2020). Reex-amining the role of vision in second language motivation: A preregistered conceptual replication of You, Dörnyei, and Csizér (2016). Language Learning, 70(1), 48–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12371
Irie, K., & Brewster, D. R. (2013). One curriculum, three stories: Ideal L2 self and L2- self discrepancy profiles. In M. T. Apple, D. Da Silva, & T. Fellner (Eds.), Language learning motivation in Japan (pp. 110-128). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090518-009
Islam, M., Lamb, M. & Chambers, G. (2013). The L2 motivational self system and national interest: A Pakistani perspective. System, 41, 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.025
Kim, T. Y., & Kim, Y. K. (2011). The effect of Korean secondary school students’ perceptual learning styles and ideal L2 self on motivated L2 behavior and English proficiency. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 11(1), 21-42. https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.11.1.201103.21
Kim, T. Y., & Kim, Y. K. (2012). Korean secondary school students' L2 learning motivation: Comparing L2 motivational self-system with socio-educational model. English Language & Literature Teaching, 18(1), 115-132.
Kormos, J., &Csizer, K. (2014). The interaction of motivation, self-regulatory strategies, and autonomous learning behavior in different learner groups. TESOL Quarterly, 48(2), 275- 299. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.129
Kormos, J., Babuder, M. B., &Pižorn, K. (2019). The role of low-level first lan-guage skills in second language reading, reading-while-listening and listening performance: A study of young dyslexic and non-dyslexic language learners. Applied Linguistics, 40(5), 834-858. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy028
Lacey, P., & Scull, J. (2015). Inclusive education for learners with severe, profound and multiple learning difficulties in England. International Perspectives on Inclusive Education, 5, 241- 268. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620140000005017
Lamb, M. (2012). A self-system perspective on young adolescents’ motivation to learn English in urban and rural settings. Language learning, 62(4), 997-1023. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00719.x
Lambert, W. E., & Gardner, R. C. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second-language learning. Newbury House Publisher.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2002). Motivation, anxiety and emotion in second language acquisition. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 45-68). John Benjamins.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System, 38(2), 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.013
Mackay, J. (2015). An ideal L2 self-investigation: Implication for self-concept, motivation and engagement with target language (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), University of Barcelona.
Magid, M., & Chan, L. (2011). Motivating English learners by helping them visualize their Ideal L2 Self: Lessons from two motivational programmes. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2011.614693
Markus, H., &Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954-969.
Martinović, A. (2018). The L2 motivational self-system: Differences among learn-ers. Jezikoslovlje, 19(1), 133-157.
McFayden, T. C., Breaux, R., Bertollo, J. R., Cummings, K., &Ollendick, T. H. (2021). COVID- 19 remote learning experiences of youth with neurodevelopmental disorders in rural Appalachia. Journal of Rural Mental Health, 45(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/rmh0000171
Moskovsky, C., Assulaimani, T., Racheva, S., & Harkins, J. (2016). The L2 motivational self-system and L2 achievement: A study of Saudi EFL learners. The ModernLanguage Journal, 100(3), 641-654. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12340
Oyserman, D., Bybee, D., & Kathy, T. (2006). Possible selves and academic outcomes: how and when possible, selves impel action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 188-204.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.188
Papi, M. (2010). The L2 Motivational Self Sys-tem, L2 Anxiety, and Motivated Behav-ior: A Structural Equation Modeling Ap-proach. System, 38(3), 467-479.
Papi, M., & Abdollahzadeh, E. (2012). Teacher motivational practice, student motiva-tion, and possible L2 selves: An exami-nation in the Iranian EFL context. Lan-guage Learning, 62(2), 571-594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00632.x
Richards, K. (2009). Trends in qualitative re-search in language teaching since 2000. Language Teaching, 42, 147-180.
Safdari, S. (2019). Operationalizing L2 motiva-tional self-system: Improving EFL learn-ers’ motivation through a vision en-hancement program. Language Teaching Research, 19, 1- 24.https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819846597
Šafranj, J., Gojkov-Rajić, A., &Bogdanović, V. (2021). The ideal L2 self as a Factor of self- motivation in willingness to com-municate. International Journal of Cog-nitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 9(2), 189-202. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2021-9-2-189-202.
Sampson, R. (2012). The language-learning self, self-enhancement activities, and self-perceptual change. Language Teaching Research, 16(3), 317-335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812436898
Sato, M., & Lara, P. (2019). Interaction vision intervention to increase second language motivation: A classroom study. In M. Sato & S. Loewen (Eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 287-313). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351190558-13 Tabachnick, B. G., &Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Teimouri, Y. (2017). L2 selves, emotions, and motivated behaviors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39, 691–709.
Ushioda, E. (2009). A person-in-context rela-tional view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Dörnyei, Z. and Ushoda, E. (eds), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 215-228). Multilin-gual Mat-ters.https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-012
You, C. J., & Chan, L. (2015). The dynamics of L2 imagery in future motivational self-guides. In Z. Dörnyei, P. D. MacIntyre& A. Henry (Eds.), Motivational dynamics in language learning (pp. 397-418). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783092574-024
You, C. J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2014). Language learning motivation in China: Results of a large-scale stratified survey. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 1-26. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu046
You, C. J., Dornyei, Z., &Csizér, K. (2016). Motivation, vision, and gender: A survey of learners of English in China. Lan-guage Learning, 66, 94–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12140