The Effect of Strategy Training of Speech Acts of Request and Apology on Developing Iranian EFL Learners “Pragmatic Performance and Critical Thinking”
Subject Areas : All areas of language and translation
Parisa Bazaei
1
,
بهرام مولایی
2
,
Massood Yazdanimoghaddam
3
1 - Department of English Teaching, Kish International Branch, Azad University, Kish Island, Iran
2 - گروه آموزش زبان انگلیسی , واحد بین المللی کیش , دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی , جزیره کیش , ایران
3 - Department of English Teaching, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran
Keywords: "Critical thinking", "EFL Learners", , " Pragmatic Performance",
Abstract :
Since requesting happens in a circumstance of imbalance, the speaker ought to continuously respect the principles of politeness without consideration to the question of their request. This study investigated the effect of strategy training of speech acts of asking and statements of regret on developing Iranian EFL learners’ pragmatic performance and critical thinking. According to the nature of the treatment, it was decided to select the participants who had not had enough language exposure at the language institute before the study. For this, before conducting an Oxford English Test (OPT), it was expected to select those whose scores would fall between one standard deviation (+1SD) above the mean and one standard deviation (-1SD) below the mean as the cut-off criterion. Finally, 80 out of 114 Iranian EFL male and female learners from six language classes in intermediate level of proficiency were chosen. Next, they were divided randomly into two experimental and control groups (20 males and 20 females, for each group). A mixed-method design was utilized; the qualitative data collected via interview was used to triangulate the quantitative data collected. The data were investigated by two skilled raters, specified in applied linguistics to recognize the effectiveness of strategy training of request and apology speech acts. The data were keyed into the SPSS. 22. The finding showed that there was an important positive consequence of strategy training of speech act of request on developing Iranian EFL learners’ pragmatic performance. A meaningful relationship was found between critical thinking and pragmatic performance.
Al-Shboul, Y., Maros, M., & Mohd Yasin, M. S. (2012). An Intercultural Study of Refusal Strategies in English between Jordanian EFL and Malay ESL Postgraduate Students. 3L: Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18(3).
Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Razavieh, A., & Sorenson, C. (2006). Introduction to Research in Education. Canada: Thomson Wadsworth. Chapter, 10, 709-716.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cohen, A. D. (2005). Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts.
Cohen, A. D., & Ishihara, N. (2005). A web-based approach to strategic learning of speech acts. Retrieved April 24, 2013.
Crystal, D. (Ed.). (1997). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. (2th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dalmau, M. S. I., & Gotor, H. C. I. (2007). From “Sorry very much” to “I’m ever so sorry”: Acquisitional patterns in L2 apologies by Catalan learners of English. Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(2), 287–315.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Quantitative Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Erving, G. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., Blohm, M. A., Howard, K., Giancarlo, C. A. (1993). Test Manual: California Critical Thinking Skills Test (CCTST).
Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross‐Feldman, L. (2005). Task‐based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55(4), 575-611.
Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight assessment, (1), 1-23.
Gass, S., & Varonis. E. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in second language acquisition, 16(3), 283-302
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds). Speech acts. vol. 3 of Syntax and Semantics (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Chen, H. J. (1996). Cross-cultural comparison of English and Chinese metapragmatics in refusal. Indiana University.
Hassal. P., Sullivan, E. & Rowlands, D. (2008). Breaking the Chain: a prison‐based participatory action research project. The British Journal of Forensic Practice.
Ifantidou, E. (2013). Pragmatic competence and explicit instruction. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 93-116.
Inbar, O., Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Shohamy, E. (2001). Students’ motivation as a function of language learning: The teaching of Arabic in Israel. Motivation and Second Language Acquisition, 23, 297-311.
Jaffe, L. E., Lindell, D., Sullivan, A. M., & Huang, G. C. (2019). Clear skies ahead: optimizing the learning environment for critical thinking from a qualitative analysis of interviews with expert teachers, Perspect Med Educ, (2019) 8:289–297
Kasper, G., & Dahl, M. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(2), 215-247.
Kasper, G., Rose, K. R. (1999). Pragmatics and SLA. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 81-104.
Kutnick, P., Blatchford, P. (2014). Effective group work in primary school classrooms. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in society, 2(1), 45-79.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Leech, G. N. (2014). The pragmatics of politeness. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguist.
LoCastro, V. (2003). An introduction to pragmatics: social action for language teachers. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Nation, I. S. (2010). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.
Neu, B. M. (1996). My grade's too low: The speech act set of complaining. Speech Acts Across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, 11, 191.
Ogiermann. E. (2009). Politeness and in-directness across cultures: A comparison of English, German, Polish and Russian requests.
Pallant, J., & Tennant. A. (2007). An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - British Journal of Clinical Psychology- Wiley Online Library
Prachanant, N. (2016). A cross-cultural study of apology speech act realizations. Pertanika: Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 24, 43-58.
Rose, K. (1994). On the validity of the discourse completion task in non-western contexts. Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 1-14.
Schmidt, F. L., Ones, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of applied psychology 78 (4), 679.
Sifianou, M. (1992). The use of diminutives in expressing politeness: Modern Greek versus English. Journal of pragmatics, 17(2), 155-173.
Tateyama, Y., Kasper, G., Mui, L.P., Tay, H., & Thananart, O. (1997). Explicit and implicit teaching of Japanese pragmatics routines. In: L. Bouton, (Ed.). Pragmatics and Language Learning, Monograph Series, vol. 8 (pp. 163-177). Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91-109.
Wannaruk, A. (2008). Pragmatic transfer in Thai EFL refusals. RELC Journal, 39(3), 318-337.
Wardhaugh, R. (1986) Introduction to sociolinguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Yuan, W., & Lyu, S. (2022). Speech act matters: Commitment to what's said or what's implicated differs in the case of assertion and promise. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 128-142.
Zarei, A. A., & Rezadoust, H. (2020). The Effects of Scaffolded and Unscaffolded Feedback on Speaking Anxiety and Self-efficacy. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 7(4), 111-132.
Zhang, D., & Koda, K. (2012). Contribution of morphological awareness and lexical inferencing ability to L2 vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension among advanced EFL learners: Testing direct and indirect effects. Reading and Writing, 25(5), 1195-216.