Investigating the TEFL Research Methodology Course: Syllabi and Document of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology
Subject Areas : Educational Management
Mojtaba Asaie
1
*
,
Mohammad Amini Farsani
2
1 - PhD Student in English Language Teaching, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor of English Language Teaching, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: Research methods teaching, syllabus elements, postgraduate studies, English language teaching,
Abstract :
Syllabi in the higher education system are a key element for achieving educational goals and missions. Developing and adjusting a quality and relevant research methods course according to the current needs is one of the main concerns in the global education systems. Teaching research methods, however, is still one of the most complex and challenging issues. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the elements of research methods syllabi in graduate programs in English language teaching in public universities of Iran and compare it with the objectives stated in the curriculum document of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology. In this study, based on purposive sampling, 28 syllabi from 23 public universities in Iran were analyzed and evaluated using MAXQDA software. Using inductive and comparative coding, a framework was adopted that eventually provided a picture of the objectives, content, and assessment and evaluation methods of the research methods courses. Finally, the results were compared with the curriculum document of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (MSRT). The comparison results showed that there is a considerable alignment between the objectives and topics of the document of the MSRT and the syllabi examined. The results of this study showed that the document of the Ministry of Science and Research can have significant impacts on how to prepare and develop the syllabi of research methods courses. At the end of this study, some suggestions for revising the document of the MSRT are presented and some suggestions for further research are provided.
اصل فتاحی، بهرام، کریمی، یوسف، سیف، علی‌اکبر و پاشا شریفی، حسن. (1388). مقایسه تأثیر روشهای سنجش (عملکردی، تشریحی و عینی) بر عملکرد دانشجویان رشته مشاوره و راهنمایی در درس روش تحقیق، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی شبستر. مجله علوم تربیتی، 2(6)، 7-33.
حیدری، الهام، کشاورزی، فهیمه و مرزوقی، رحمت‌اله. (1398). بررسی روابط بین فرهنگ پژوهشی دانشگاه و خودکارآمدی پژوهشی دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی: نقش واسطه‌گری توانمندی نگارش علمی. پژوهش در نظامهای آموزشی، 13(47)، 7- 21.
سند بازنگری برنامه درسی دوره کارشناسی ارشد رشته آموزش زبان انگلیسی. (1396). وزارت علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری.
عارفی، محبوبه. (1384). برنامه‌ریزی درسی راهبردی در آموزش عالی. انتشارات جهاد دانشگاهی.
کاییدی، اعظم، نصراصفهانی، احمدرضا، شریفیان، فریدون و موسوی پور، سعید. (1402). واکاوی چالش‌های اساسی آموزش روش تحقیق در رشته‌های علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی. مطالعات برنامه درسی آموزش عالی، 14(27)، 7-41.
کرمی، مرتضی، حاتمی‌کیا، سمیه و پورحاجی، رویا. (1398). دانش محتوایی تدریس پژوهش: چارچوبی برای تدوین کتب درسی روش تحقیق در علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی. پژوهش و نگارش کتب دانشگاهی، 23(45)، 118-136.
محمودی، فیروز، عبدالله‌زاده، محمدتقی و منصورزاده، محمد. (1395). کاربرد ارزشیابی فرایندی در مدارس ابتدایی (مطالعه موردی آموزش‌وپرورش ممقان). آموزش و ارزشیابی، 9(34)، 51-62.
معروفی، یحیی، کیامنش، علیرضا، مهرمحمدی، محمود و علی‌عسکری، مجید. (1386). ارزشیابی کیفیت تدریس در آموزش عالی: بررسی برخی دیدگاه‌ها. مطالعات برنامه درسی، 2(5)، 88- 112.
مهرمحمدی، محمود و همکاران. (1390). برنامه درسی، نظرگاه‌ها، رویکردها و چشم‌اندازها. انتشارات سمت.
ناجی، سعید. (1385). نقدی بر آموزش روش تحقیق در نظام آموزش روش تحقیق کشور. فصلنامه حوزه و دانشگاه، 12(47)، 136-155.
نصر، احمدرضا، اعتمادی‌زاده، هدایت‌‌الله و نیلی، محمدرضا. (1390). رویکردهای نظری و عملی تدوین برنامه‌های درسی در آموزش عالی. انتشارات سمت.
یادگارزاده، غلام‌رضا. (1397). مفهومشناسی برنامه درسی آموزش عالی. تهران: دانشنامه ایرانی برنامه درسی.
یمنی‌‌دوزی سرخابی، محمد. (1391). کیفیت در آموزش عالی. انتشارات سمت.
Amini Farsani, M. A., & Ghorbani, B. D. (2024). Examining research motivation, self-efficacy, and anxiety in TEFL graduate students: A structural equation modelling approach. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 29(3), 541-559 .
Amini Farsani, M., & Asaie, M. (2024). Exploring TEFL research methods courses in Iran: A path to research synthesis pedagogy. The Qualitative Report, 29(1), 206-228. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2024.5858
Amini Farsani, M., & Babaii, E. (2020). Applied linguistics research in three decades: A methodological synthesis of graduate theses in an EFL context. Quality & Quantity, 54(4), 1257-1283.
Amini Farsani, M., Jamali, H. R., Beikmohammadi, M., Daneshvar Ghorbani, B., & Soleimani, L. (2021). Methodological orientations, academic citations, and scientific collaboration in applied linguistics: What do research synthesis and bibliometrics indicate? System, 100, 102547.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Sorensen Irvine, C., & Walker, D. (2019). Introduction to research in education. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Asaie, M., & Amini Farsani, M. (2023). Surveying TEFL M.A. students’ attitude towards research and research methodology course: A mixed research approach. Research in Post Compulsory Education, 28(1), 1-20.
Barraket, J. (2005). Teaching research method using a student-centered approach? Critical reflections on practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2(2), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.2.2.3
Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (5th Ed.). Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Brown, J. D. (2015). Why bother learning advanced quantitative methods in L2 research? In book Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 9-20). Routledge.
Burnard, P. (1991). A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Education Today, 11(6), 461-466.
Byrnes, H. (2013). Notes from the Editor. Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 825-827. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12051.x
Carty, R. (2007). Teaching research methods: A pragmatic approach. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 98-105.
Ciarocco, N. J., Strohmetz, D. B., & Lewandowski, G. W., Jr. (2017). What’s the point? Faculty perceptions of research methods courses. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 3(2), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000085
Daniel, B., Kumar, V., & Omar, N. (2018). Postgraduate conception of research methodology: Implications for learning and teaching. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 41(2), 220-236. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2017.1283397
Dey, I. (1993). Reducing fragmentation in qualitative research. In Udo Kelle (Ed.), Computer qualitative data analysis: Theory, methods, and practice (pp. 69-79). Sage Publications.
DeZure, D. (2002). Learning from Change: Landmarks in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education from Change Magazine, 1969-1999. Stylus Publishing.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006
Earley, M. A. (2014). A Synthesis of the literature on research methods education. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(3), 242-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.860105
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
Fisher, S., & Justwan, F. (2018). Scaffolding assignments and activities for undergraduate research methods. Journal of Political Science Education, 14(1), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2017.1367301
Gonulal, T., Loewen, S., & Plonsky, L. (2017). The development of statistical literacy in applied linguistics graduate students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 5-133.
Gurung, R. A. R., & Stoa, R. (2020). A national survey of teaching and learning research methods: Important concepts and faculty and student perspectives. Teaching of Psychology, 47(2), 111-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320901374
Hatch, E., & Farhady, H. (1982). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Newbury House Publishers.
Hesse-Biber, S. (2015). The problems and prospects in the teaching of mixed methods research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(5), 463-477.
Hodson, R. D. (1999). Analyzing Documentary Accounts. Sage Publications.
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Hudson, T., & Liosa, L. (2015). Design issues and inference in experimental L2 research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 76.
Jenkins, A. (2000). The relationship between teaching and research: Where does geography stand and deliver? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(3), 325–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/713677414
Kilburn, D., Nind, M., & Wiles, R. (2014). Learning as researchers and teachers: The development of a pedagogical culture for social science research methods? British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(2), 191-207.
Lehti, S., & Lehtinen, E. (2005). Computer‐supported problem‐based learning in the research methodology domain. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 49(3), 297-324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830500109618
Lewthwaite, S., & Nind, M. (2016). Teaching research methods in the social sciences: Expert perspectives on pedagogy and practice. British Journal of Educational Studies, 64(4), 413-430.
Liebscher, P. (1998). Quantity with quality? Teaching quantitative and qualitative methods in an LIS master’s program. Library Trends, 46(4), 668-680.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2016). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Routledge.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The Content Analysis Guidebook. Sage Publications.
Plonsky, L. (2014). Study quality in quantitative L2 Research (1990-2010): A methodological synthesis and call for reform. Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 450-470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12058.x
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2004). Nursing research: Principles and methods. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Purpura, J., Brown, J, D., & Schoonen, R. (2015). Improving the validity of quantitative measures in applied linguistics research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 37-75.
Ross, K., & Call-Cummings, M. (2020). Reflections on failure: Teaching research methodology. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 43(5), 498-511. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727x.2020.1719060
Sizemore, O. J., & Lewandowski Jr., G. W. (2009). Learning might not equal liking: Research methods course changes knowledge but not attitudes. Teaching of Psychology, 36(2), 90-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280902739727
Stark, J. S., & Lattuca, L. R. (1997). Shaping The College Curriculum: Academic Plans In Action. Allyn and Bacon.
Sweifach, J. (2014). Group work education today: A content analysis of MSW group work course syllabi. Social Work with Groups, 37(1), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01609513.2013.816920