The comparative effect of prebiotic, growth promoter antibiotic, probiotic, yeast cell wall and acid fire on broiler chickens performance

Subject Areas : Veterinary Clinical Pathology

افشین  Zakeri ¹ (Poultry Section, Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University- Tabriz Branch, Tabriz , Iran)
مهدی  Taghi Nejad Roudbaneh ² (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Islamic Azad University- Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran)
آیدین  Azizpour ³ (Member of Young Researchers Clubs (YRC), Islamic Azad University- Ardebil Branch, Ardebil, Iran)
وحید  Hajiabaloo ⁴ (Postgraduate Student of Poultry Medicine, Faculty of Specialized Veterinary Science, Islamic Azad University- Science and Research Branch, Tehran , Iran)

Received: 2009-02-21 Accepted : 2010-05-29 Published : 2010-05-22

Keywords: Probiotic, Prebiotic, Growth promoter antibiotic, Acid fires, Yeast cell wall,

Abstract :

In this study 600 Cobb 500 broiler chickens were divided in six similar groups (A, B, C, D, E&F) with 100 chickens in each group (with four replicates of 25 chickens in each group). 100 g/ton growth promoter antibiotic in experimental group (B), 100 g/ton Prebiotic in experimental group (C), 800 g/ton Acid fires in experimental group (D), 1 kg/ton MOS in experimental group (E) and 4 kg/ton Yeast cell wall in experimental group (F) were added to the basic diets however the control group (A) chickens were fed only with the basic diet. Every week 100 chickens from each group were selected randomly and productive parameters such as weight gain, FCR, EEF, mortality, feed intake (FI) were calculated. On days 9, 17 and 25 of growth (1 day before and 7, 14 days after first Newcastle B1 vaccination), from each groups, each time 20 chickens were chosen randomly and serum antibody titres of these chickens were measured against Newcastle vaccine by HI test. The results obtained from statistical analysis indicated that using natural growth promoting substances not only increases humoral immunity but it also leads to improvement of productive parameters (p<0.05).  

References:

1. ذاکری، ا.، بزرگمهری فرد، م.ح. و فیضی، ع. 1384. بررسی اثر 3-نیترو4-هیدروکسی فنیل آرسینیک اسید بر میزان رشد پارامترهای تولید و اثر کوکسیدیو استات­ها. مجله  علوم دامپزشکی ایران، 2(1) : صفحات: 10-3.
   
   
   1.  Bailey, J.S., Blankenship, L.C. and Cox, N.A. 1991. Effect of fructo-oligosaccharides on salmonella colonization of the chicken intestine. Poult. Sci. 70:2433-2438.
   
   
   2.  Bedford, M. 2000. Removal of antibiotic growth promoters from poultry diets: implications and strategies to minimize subsequent problems. World Poult. Sci. J. 56:347-365.
   
   
   3.  Bello, F.D., Walter, J., Hertel, C. and Hammes, W.P. 2001. In vitro study of prebiotic properties of levan-type exopolysaccharides from Lactobacilli and non-digestible carbohydrates using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 24:232-237.
   
   
   4.  Chen, Y.C., Nakthong, C. and Chen, T.C. 2005. Improvement of laying hen performance by dietary Prebiotic chicory oligofructose and inulin. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 4:170-178.
   
   
   5.  Elwinger, K., Berndtson, E., Engstrom,B., Fossum O., Waldenstedt , L. 1998.  Effect of antibiotic growth promoters and anticoccidials on growth of Clostridium perfringens in the caeca and on performance of broiler chickens.  Acta Vet. Scand. 39:433-441.
   
   
   6. George, B.A., Quarles, C.L. and Fagerberg, D.J. 1982. Virginiamycin effects on controlling necrotic enteritis infection in chickens. Poult. Sci. 61:447-450.
   
   
   7. Hofacre, C.L., Beacorn, T., Collett, S. and Mathis, G. 2003.  Using competitive exclusion, mannan-oligosaccharide and other intestinal products to control necrotic enteritis. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 12:60-64.
   
   
   8. Leeson, S. and Summers, J.D. 1997. Commercial Poultry Nutrition. Department of Animal & Poultry, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, Second Edition. p: 40-110.
   
   
   9. Lemieux, F.M., Southern, L.L. and Binder, T.D. 2003. Effect of mannan- oligosaccharides on growth performance of weanling pigs. J.Anim. Sci. 81:2482- 2487.
   
   
   10. Milner, J.A. and Roberfoid, M. 1999. Nutritional properties of inulin and oligofructose. J Nutr. 129:S 1395-502.
   
   
   11. Macfarlance, G.T. and Cummings, J.H. 1999. Probiotics and Prebiotics: Can regulating the activities of intestinal bacteria benefit. Hea Roberfoid lth. Est. J. Med. 171:187-191.
   
   
   12. National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. NationalAcademy Press WashingtonD.C., Ninth rev. Edition. p: 20-81.
   
   
   13. Patterson, J.A. and Burkholder, K.M. 2003.  Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry production. Poult. Sci. 82:627–631.
   
   
   14. Roberfoid, M.B. 2000. Health benefits of non – digestible oligosaccharides. Adv, Exp, Med Bull. 427:211-219.
   
   
   15. Roberfoid, M.B. 2000. Prebiotics, Probiotic: are they functional foods. Am Clin. Nutr. 71(6 suppl):1682 S-4687S, discussion, p: 1688-1690.
   
   
   16. Roberfoid, M.B. 1998.  Prebiotics and synbiotics: concepts and nutritional properties. Br. J. Nutr. 80:197-202.
   
   
   17. Salminen. S, Bouley, C., Boutron- ruoult, M.C. 1998. Functional food science and gostroinestinal physiology and function. Bry Nutr: 80(suppl):147-171.
   
   
   18. Savage, T.F., Cotter, P.F. and Zakrzewska, E.I. 1996. The effect of feeding mannan oligosaccharide on immunoglobulins, plasma IgG and bile IgA, of Wrolstad MW male turkes. Poult. Sci. 75:143.
   
   
   19. Vegad, J.L. 2004. Prebiotics, Probiotic, Acidfires and Antibiotic growth Promotors. Poultry diseases a guide for farmers and poultry professional, First Edition. p: 339-342& 343-346.
   
   
   20. Zoppi, G. 1998. Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and eubiotics. Pediatr. Med. Chir. 20:13-17.