List of Articles Mansooreh Bagheripoor

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Jurisprudential and legal effects of reluctance and urgency
  Mansooreh Bagheripoor
  In this research, two issues of reluctance and urgency have been explained using the sources of Shia jurisprudence and Iran's codified laws. For this purpose, things like the lexical and terminological definition of the two mentioned words, as well as jurisprudential re More

  In this research, two issues of reluctance and urgency have been explained using the sources of Shia jurisprudence and Iran's codified laws. For this purpose, things like the lexical and terminological definition of the two mentioned words, as well as jurisprudential reasons and their legal, punitive and criminal effects on the two scheming and distressed people have been briefly discussed and relevant opinions have been presented in each case. The basis of the difference between reluctance and necessity has been considered to be that since the pressure on makra is the result of imposing and threatening another person and this is not the case in emergency, then makra's discretion is incomplete and the person's right to choose is complete. Regarding the conditions for the realization of each and the difference between reluctance and urgency, he has reached the conclusion that the ultimate goal of civil responsibility is to compensate the loss suffered by an act without legal permission, and reluctance in criminal matters is under certain conditions. Among the total causes, the defendant will be held criminally responsible, and also the rule of the authority of the ruling steward has been proven. Urgency and necessity are also considered as a state and are among the causes of criminal liability. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - The concept of play, play and cancellation and examples of themAmir,
  Mansooreh Bagheripoor Seyed Ali Pourmanouchehri Nusratullah Saberi
  Due to the special nature of their operations, joint stock companies are considered as money-based companies. The main question that the present study seeks to answer is what is the mechanism of capital increase of joint stock companies in Iranian and American law? In I More

  Due to the special nature of their operations, joint stock companies are considered as money-based companies. The main question that the present study seeks to answer is what is the mechanism of capital increase of joint stock companies in Iranian and American law? In Iran, the capital increase of joint stock companies occurs in two ways: increasing the nominal amount of shares and issuing new shares. While in US law, due to the expansion of joint stock companies to public, private, professional and other companies, the concept of nominal value of shares is removed from US law and in states where such a concept still exists, all or part of the company's surplus account is transferred to account. Capital, legal capital increases. The laws of each state have their own rules in accordance with the requirements of that state, which today are the main laws of the American companies and the laws of New York and Delaware. Manuscript profile