Designing The Interaction Model Of Educational Managers And Identifying And Prioritizing Factors Affecting It
Subject Areas :Mohammad Hosein Zarei 1 , Javid Ahmadi 2
1 - Assistant professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Peyam Noor University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Master’s degree in Curriculum, Department of Educational Sciences, Peyam Noor University, Tehran, Iran. & Teacher
Keywords: Model, productivity and efficiency of educational services, Interaction of educational managers, Development of educational services, Educational managers.,
Abstract :
Introduction: The aim of the current research is to design a pattern of interactions among educational managers and to prioritize factors affecting it. research methodology: The research methodology of this mixed-type applied research has used two qualitative approaches with the ground- theory method and quantitative with descriptive analytical method A semi-structured interview was conducted with 19 subject experts in order to design a pattern of interactions among educational managers, which was a purposive sampling. The selection criteria of data saturation and data authenticity were confirmed by 5 subject experts In the quantitative part of the sampling method, the available sample number was 100 people from the managers of education organizations in Fars province and the selection criteria was Morgan's table The measurement tool is a researcher-made questionnaire with 40 questions, whose content validity was confirmed and its reliability was measured with Cronbach's alpha of (0/81). Data analysis was done in the qualitative part by the method of Strauss and Corbin and in the quantitative part by the Friedman chi-squer test. Findings: After the interviews, 5 selective codes, 19 central codes and 98 open codes were extracted Using the results obtained from the qualitative part of the research, the model of interactions among educational managers was designed In the quantitative section, the effective factors on the development of educational managers' interactions were prioritized that the existence of interest and motivation in principals is the most important strategy of school principals and the most effective people, and lack of attention to the culture and values of the society and procrastination in creating culture is the most important obstacle in the development of interactions. Conclusion: The results of the qualitative part showed all the factors affecting the development of educational managers' interactions and finally led to the production of models in this field. the designed model also provided a comprehensive perspective of the development of these In addition to representing and highlighting the facts in the interactions of educational managers, interactions. The results of the quantitative part showed that school principals play the most important role in interactions, therefore they should strive to develop their cultural and social communication skills.
1. Alabi, T (2022). principals’managerial styles and school effectiveness in public senior secondary schools in kwara state. al-hikmah journal of education, 2(9), 1-16.
2. Caybas, T; Ordu, A (2022). Teachers' Views on the Communication Skills of School Administrators: A Mixed Method Research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(4), 829-845.
3. Contreras, G; Gonzalez, A;Fernandez, I; Cepa, C; Escobar, J (2022). Leadership as a tool in ed-ucation. Contemporary Engineering Sciences.
4. Curtis, G. J. (2020). Follower‐rated leadership styles, leader behaviours, and leaders’ thinking styles: A test of the cognitive experiential leadership model. Australian Journal of Psychology, 72(4), 318–327.
5. Dean, M. (2020). Perceptions of Elementary School Support Staff of Their Role in Supporting the School Mission Statement.
6. Dianat, Z; hossingholizadeh, R; Ebrahimi Kooshak Mahdi, S (2023). The role of school principals’ Instructional leadership in predicting teachers’ professional learning in the primary schools in Mashhad city. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 14(2), 16-1. doi: 10.30495/jedu.2023.27824.5570[in pesian]
7. Dimopoulos, A (2020). Educational Leadership Effectiveness. Is it a Matter of a Leader’s Charac-teristics, Behaviors, or Leadership Style?. Journal of Educational Management Studies, 3, 13.
8. Document of Fundamental reforms in Education (2011). [in pesian]
9. Elzami,Esmat,abbaspour,Abbas,KhorsandiTaskoh,Ali,Purkarimi,javad,Rahimian,Hamid.(2021).In Search of an Effective Framework for the Professional Development of Primary School Principals. Quarterly Journal of Training and Development of Human Resources, 30, 109-133. http://istd.saminatech.ir/en/Article/31395 [in pesian]
10. Garcia-Jimenez, J; Lucas-Oliva, I; Rodríguez-Santero, J; Torres-Gordillo, J. J (2023). Management Discourse Analysis of High-and Low-Efficacy Schools: A Comparative Study of Factors Influencing School Performance. Education Sciences, 13(7), 723.
11. Hallinger, P (2011). Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration49(2),125 -142.
12. Jafari Moghadam, Saeed (2004). Documenting managers' experiences from the perspective of knowledge management, publisher; Institute of Management Research and Training.[in pesian]
13. Karimi, N (2022). Management Skills, school management, 20(6).45-46. [in pesian]
14. Kerr, K. A (2023). A Mixed Methods Study on Role of Leadership in Developing a Collaborative Culture as Perceived by Employees (Doctoral dissertation, Franklin University).
15. Keshavarz , R (2016). Exploration in management theories and its application in educational management, International Conference of management Elites.Tehran, Iran. [in pesian]
16. Khamari, Z; bayani, A. A; Fakuri Haji Yar, H; Saemi, H (2023). Modeling the dimensions and components of eligibility of primary school principals: A mixed study. Journal of Psychological Science, 22(127), 1467-1483. doi:10.52547/JPS.22.127.1467. [in pesian]
17. Leithwood, K; Patten, S; Jantzi, D (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational administration quarterly, 46(5), 671-706.
18. Marin, I; Marin-Pantelescu, A (2020). Educational Management Strategies. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 20(1), 726-729.
19. McNamara, M (2012). Starting to untangle the web of cooperation, coordination, and collaboration: A framework for public managers. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(6), 389–401.
20. Meidanipour, K; abbaspour, A; khorsandi taskoh, A; Borzooian, S (2019). Linking Theory and Practice in Educational Management: Exploring School Principals' Interaction with University Professors. School Administration, 7(3), 44-23. doi: 10.34785/J010.1398.548 [in pesian]
21. Mohammadi, M., Ghorchian, N. G., Shafipour Motlagh, F., & Saheb Zamani, M. (2023). Identify strategies for sharing managerial experiences In elementary schools in a phenomenological way. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 14(5), -. doi: 10.30495/jedu.2023.29519.5894[in pesian]
22. Moradi, M; Miralmasi, A (2020). Pragmatic research method. (F. Seydi, Ed.) (1st ed.). Tehran: School of quantitative and qualitative research. Retrieved from https://analysisacademy.com[in pesian]
23. Paais, M; Pattiruhu, J. R (2020). Effect of motivation, leadership, and organizational culture on satisfaction and employee performance. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(8), 577–588.
24. Pevzner, M; Petryakov, P; Shirin, A (2021). Training Teachers For Leadership In Education. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences.
25. Rothausen, T. J (2022). Diverse, ethical, collaborative leadership through revitalized cultural archetype: The Mary alternative. Journal of Business Ethics.
26. Schwarz, G (2017). Transformational leadership and job performance: the role of organizational identification. The Palgrave handbook of leadership in transforming Asia, 519-539.
27. Shahbazi, h (2023). Effective interactions in educational management: strategies and best methods, Tehran: Qasd Publications. [in pesian]
28. Shirbagi, N; Moradi, O (2018). Representation of Teachers' Experience From Inappropriate Interactions with School Principals. School Administration, 5(2), 63-85. [in pesian]
29. Shokri, S; Sajadi, M.J; Dadgar, K; Dadgar, S; Vazifeh Damirchi, S (2020). Designing a suitable Human Resource Management Model at the Cultural Institutions in Ardabil Province. Cultural Leadership Studies, 2(1). https://clsj.ir/issue2/jcls99012.pdf. [in pesian]
30. Steinhoff, J. C; Price, L. A; Green, E. L (2019). It’s all about the culture. Journal of Government Financial Management, 68(2), 32–39.
31. Wiewiora, A; Chang, A; Smidt, M (2020). Individual, project and organizational learning flows within a global project-based organization: Exploring what, how and who. International Journal of Project Management, 38(4), 201–214.
32. Yu, H.S; Lee, E.J; Na, T. K (2022). The mediating effects of work-life balance (WLB) and ease of using WLB programs in the relationship between WLB organizational culture and turnover intention. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(6), 34828.