The Effect of Innovation Strategy on Performance according to Balanced Scorecard research on Esfahan Electricity Power Distribution Co.

Subject Areas : Public Policy In Administration

Hossein Sadri ¹ (PHD Candidatet in Puplic Management in Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan Branch)
MohammadReza Dalvi ² (Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan Branch Assistant Professor, Management Group)

Received: 2016-11-05 Accepted : 2017-04-16 Published : 2017-11-22

Keywords: Innovation Strategy, Balanced Scorecard, Competitive advantage,

Abstract :

Background: the complexity of competition environment and increase in customers’ expectations declares the necessity of  organizations’ performance measurement to be sure about its strategies. One of  the important  management tools for performance measurement and  also strategy execution in companies is balanced scorecard that helps managers to control and refine their key activities. Objective: The goal of this research is evaluation of Innovation strategy effect and its guidelines on performance according to balanced scorecard quadruple dimensions in Esfahan Electricity Power Distribution Company as a main  electricity power distribution company in country. Methods: The nature of this research is descriptive and its method is survey. The research statistical population is 150 people of Esfahan Electricity Power Distribution Company’s managers, chairmen, and experts which were chosen by random sampling method and 100 people were chosen by Cochran's C test as a sample size. The data collection tool is survey which its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach’s Alpha. Multiple Regression Analysis and SPSS software are used for data analysis. Findings: Research results represents the definite effect of aggressive, defensive, futurity and proactiveness guidelines and also the relative effect of analytic and risky guidelines on performance of Esfahan Electricity Power Distribution Company.

References:

بورنه، مایک و بورنه، پای پا ).2002(.کارت امتیازی متوازن. ترجمه الهوردی تقوی. تهران: انتشارات رسا، 1386.        
2- پرهیزگار، محمدمهدی و ]دیگران[.1389. ارائه شاخص‌های ارزیابی عملکرد بر مبنای کارت امتیازی متوازن. تهران: نشریه علمی پژوهشی مدیریت فردا. سال نهم. شماه 25. 
3- دلوی، محمدرضا و ]دیگران[.1393. دایر¸ المعارف تئوری‌های سازمان و مدیریت. اصفهان: موسسه انتشاراتی امام عصر (عج).      
4- رضائیان، علی.(1387). مبانی سازمان و مدیریت. تهران: انتشارات سمت.          
5- رضائیان، علی.(1389).اصول مدیریت. تهران: انتشارات سمت.         
6-مجیبی، مجتبی و منا میلانی.(1390).بررسی رابطه بین استراتژی و ساختار سازمانی در شرکت توزیع برق نواحی استان تهران. سال هشتم.شماره 22.  
7- هاشمی، شیده.(1388). بررسی کاربردی استراتژی‌های چهارگانه مایلز و اسنو. بازیابی ازwww.irandoc.ac.ir   
8-Akhlagh, E.M. ,Moradi,Mehdizade, M. , & Ahmadi N.D(2013). Innovation strategies,
 performance diversity and development: An empirical analysis in Iran construction
 and housing industry. Iranian Journal of Management Studies,6(2),31-60.
9- Akman, G(2003). Bilisim sektöründe Pazar odaklilik, yenilik stratejileri ve yenilik
 kabiliyeti arasindaki iliskiler ve bunlarin sirket performansi üzerindeki etkileri.
 Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yaymlanmamis Doktora
10- Akman G., & Yilmaz, C.(2008). Innovation capability,Innovation strategy and market
 orientation: An empirical analysis in Turkish software industry. International Journal of
 Innovation Management, 12 (1),69-111.

11- Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G.J. (1998). Organizing for radical product  innovation:The overlooked
 role of willingness to cannibalize. Journal of Marketing Research, XXXV (November), 474-487.

12- Garengo, P., Biazzo, S., & Bititci, U.S. (2005). Performance measurement systems in smes: A review for
 a research agenda. International Journal of Management Review,   7(1), 25-47.

13- Gumbus, A. (2005). Introducing the balanced scorecard: Creating metrics to measure performance,
 Journal of Management Education, 29 (4) , 617-630 DOI:10.1177/1052562905276278.

14-Kaplan, R.S. (1998). Innovation action research: creating new managementtheory and practice. Journal
 of Management Accounting Research, 10, 89-118.

15-Karabulut, Ahu Tugba (2015). Effects of Innovation Strategy on firm performance. Procedia-social and
 Behavioral science 195 (2015) 1338-1347.                           

16-Lumpkin, G.T.,& Dess G.G. (1996).Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it
 to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21 (1),               135-172.

17- Morgan R. E., & Strong, C. A. (1998). Market orientation and dimensions of strategic
 orientation. European Journal of Marketing, 32 (11/12), 1051- 1073. http: //dx.doi.org/
 10.1108/03090569810243712.

18- Öncü, M. A., Mesci, Sahin, Ö., & Faikoğlu, S. (2013). Finansal yeniliklerin isletme
 performansina etkisi: İstanbul' daki hizmet işletmelerine yönelik      biraraştirma.
 Uluslararasi Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 5 (3), 119-129.

19-Venkatraman, N. (1989). Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct,
 dimensionality, and measurement. Management Science, 35 (8), 942-962.