On the Causal Relationship between Psychological Empowerment and Information Technology Capability with Mediating Role of General Self-Efficacy in High School Principals in Isfahan

Subject Areas : Infomartion Technology

Seyed Akbar Nilipour Tabatabaei ¹ , Safoora Yazdchi ²

1 - Assistant Professor, Management Department, Research Institute of Management, Shakhes Pajouh Research Institution, Isfahan, Iran
2 - PhD Student in Futurology, Shakhes Pajouh Research Institution, Isfahan, Iran

Received: 2014-04-24 Accepted : 2014-08-22 Published : 2014-11-01

Keywords: Psychological Empowerment, self-efficacy, information technology capability, Isfahan city high schools,

Abstract :

The aim of this study was to survey the causal relationship between psychological empowerment and IT capability, with mediation of self-efficacy, in female high school principals in Isfahan. The method of the study was descriptive-correlational. The study population was 250 female school principals in the academic year 2013-2014 in Isfahan City. A subset of 152 people was chosen by Cochran's formula and random sampling method stratified based on various regions. The data collecting tools were the psychological empowerment questionnaire of Spritzer, et al., self-efficacy questionnaire of Schwartz and Jerusalem and that of IT capability. The face validity of the questionnaires was confirmed and, using Cronbach alpha, the reliability of empowerment, self-efficacy and IT capability questionnaires were 0.85, 0.80 and 0.82, respectively. The data were analyzed via both SPSS-18 and Lisrel softwares at the level of descriptive and referential statistics with step-wise regression tests, Pearson correlation and structural equations. The results confirmed that there was a positive significant relationship between principals' empowerment and their IT self-efficacy. There was also a positive significant relationship between their self-efficacy and IT capability.  Moreover, the significance of psychological empowerment component was the best predictive factor for IT capability. The findings of structural equations revealed that the psychological empowerment through self-efficacy could influence IT capability.

References:

1. Abdollahi, B., & Naveh Ebrahim, A. (2006). Staff empowering: Golden key for human resources management. Tehran: Virayesh. (in Persian).


2. Aghahosiny, T., Sobhaninezhad, M., & Abedi , A. (2006). Factors affecting school management effective secondary school from the perspective of the administrators and secretaries. Journal of Daneshvar (Raftar), 18, 57-76. (in Persian).


3. Alkahtani, A., & Sulaiman, E. (2011). Employee empowerment and job satisfaction: An empirical study of Malaysian management. World Applied Science Journal, 5, 1269-1284.


4. Asadzadeh, A., & Chakherlouy, F. (2012). Investigating the effect of using e-government on occupational empowering. Journal of Basic and Applied Scienific Research, 2, 1021-1026. (in Persian).


5. Ayris, C. (2005). Cause of lowest organization Efficiency (Second Edition). International Ed, Mc Grow-Hill.


6. Banici, P., & Esmaeili, M. L. (2010). Survey relationship between the dimensions of the learning organization with the effectiveness of school managers, supervisor of district 4 in Tehran. Modern Thoughts in Education, 5(3(19)), 59-71. (in Persian).


7. Chmielewski, A., Dumont, H., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Tracking effects depend on tracking type: An international comparison of students mathematics self-concept.American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 925-957.


8. Chow, I., Low, S., & Hong, J. (2006). The impact of development expects empowerment and organizational supporton creating service staff performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 25,478-495.


9. Dewettinck, K., & Ameijde, M. (2011). Linking leadership empowerment behavior to employee attitudes and nehavioral intentions. Personnel Review, 3, 284-305.


10. Foladchang, M. (2003). Study self-efficacy of the students of state high schools of Shiraz. Retrieved from http://www.mrfi.ir/kol/maghalat/amuzesh/5.htm (in Persian).


11. Gupta, Sh., & Prasad, A. (2011). Productivity based hybrid model: Learning from the indo-Japanese and Indian auto sector. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 1, 158-171.


12. Helfat, C., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., & Winter, S. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Malden, MA: Blackwell.


13. Holger, G., & Aoife, H. (2011). Services outsourcing and innovation: An empirical investigation. Western Economic Association International, 49(2), 321-333.


14. Khadivi, A., & AlijaniFarid, R. (2008). The relationship between managers development and organizational effectiveness in high school. Journal of Education &Evaluaion, 1(1), 39-72. (in Persian).


15. Kuo, T., Li, H., & Lin, C. (2009). Employee empowerment in a technology advanced work environment. Industrial Management and Data System, 2, 24-42.


16. Lawler, E. (1994). Total quality management & employee envolvement: Are they compatible. Academy of Management Executive.


17. Lawson, L. (2014). Rethinking the purpose of community empowerment in neighbourhood regeneration. Health Promotion International, 29(1-2), 65-81.


18. Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.


19. Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, Interpersonal relationship and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 3, 407-416.


20. Lopez, A., Real, J., & Valle, R. (2009). Relationship between human resource management practices and organizational learning capability. Personal Review, 3, 344-363.


21. Porter, J. (2008). Employee empowerment (From management practice to employees behavioral empowerment). Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 7, 625-638.


22. Schwartez, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1996). Changing risk behaviors and adopting helath behaviors: The role of self-efficacy belifes. Self efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Prsss.


23. Seeshing Yeung, A., Rhonda, G., & Jinnat, A. (2013). Self-concepts and educational outcomes of Indigenous Australian students in urban and rural school settings. Health Promotion International, 34(4), 405-427.


24. Sinovet, P., & Kotha, S. (2002). Continuous ‘morphing’: Competing through dynamic capabilities, form, and function. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1263-1280.


25. Spritzer, G. (1996). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement and validation. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.


26. Torabi, M. (2012). Need to empower students. Retrieved Nov 1, 2012, from http:// www.mrfi.ir/kol/maghalat/amuzesh/23.htm (in Persian).


27. Wang, C., & Ahmed, P. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 31-51.


28. Wiggins, N. (2012). Popular education for health promotion and community empowerment: A review of the literature. Health Promotion International, 27(3), 356-371.


29. Zhu, W., Sosic, J., & Riggio, E. (2012). Relationships between transformational and active transactional leadership and followers’ organizational identification: The role of psychological empowerment. Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management, 8(2), 186-212.