Field and Aims: In the modern financial system, it is accepted that banks operate for profit and interest, and the traditional view that banks are only money trustees is rejected today. Therefore, the issue of bank interest is always considered as a means of earning. In
More
Field and Aims: In the modern financial system, it is accepted that banks operate for profit and interest, and the traditional view that banks are only money trustees is rejected today. Therefore, the issue of bank interest is always considered as a means of earning. Income is considered for banks. Although in Islamic banking, interest is considered usury and its receipt is prohibited. Based on this, in this research, we are looking to investigate what is the position of interest and especially compound interest in Iran's banking system and international documents, and do the laws emphasize its validity?Method: This article is written in analytical-descriptive method.Findings and Conclusions: In Article 713 of the Code of Civil Procedure approved in 1939, the lawmaker had explicitly prohibited the claim for damages, and on this basis, during the rule of the said law, the claim for damages for delay in payment or the claim for damages for damages was permissible beyond the uniformity of procedure No. 1458 dated 1327 15/9/2015, apart from damages for delay and litigation damages, the Supreme Court excluded all damages from the scope of Article 713 of the aforementioned law. However, in the Civil Procedure Law approved in 2000, there is no rule prohibiting damages from damages, but the legislator established a new one as described in Note 2.
Manuscript profile
