Effect of Offline Newly-Developed Task Cycle (NDTC) on Iranian Medical Students’ Reading Comprehension Performance
DOR: 20.1001.1.23223898.2021.9.37.13.1
Subject Areas :
Morteza Gholami
1
,
Peyman Rajabi
2
1 - Department of Foreign Languages, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
2 - Department of Foreign Languages, Malayer Branch, Islamic Azad University, Malayer, Iran
Keywords: K,
Abstract :
k
Bensafa, A. (2017). Functions of ESP: Criteria to Understand what Really Makes IT an Approach Not a Product. Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 175-179.
Breen, M. (2012). The second language curriculum: The evaluation cycle for language learning tasks. University of Lancaster, Lancaster, England: Cambridge University Press.
Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (2013). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing: Routledge.
Dastpak, M., Jamshidi, M. (2008). Reading Matrix. Tehran: Azaran.
Davari, H., Iranmehr, A., & Erfani, S. M. (2013). A Critical Evaluation of PNU ESP Textbooks. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(4).
De la Fuente, M. J. (2009). The role of pedagogical tasks and focus on form in the acquisition of discourse markers by advanced language learners. Little words. Their History, Phonology, Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics, and Acquisition, 211-221.
Dreyer, C., & Nel, C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System, 31(3), 349-365.
Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford University Press, 2003.
Ellis, R. (2009). Task‐based language teaching: Sorting out the misunderstandings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 221-246.
Eslami, Z. R. (2010). Teachers' Voice vs. Students' Voice: A Needs Analysis Approach to English for Acadmic Purposes (EAP) in Iran. English language teaching, 3(1), 3-11.
Fani, H., Ghiasi, P., & Ghaneh, Z. (2011). The comparison of task-based and traditional teaching methods in high school students’ English development. Quarterly Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 4, 99-114.
Farhady, H. (2005). Reflections on and directions for ESP materials development in SAMT. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the first national ESP/EAP conference.
Iranmehr, A., Erfani, S. M., & Davari, H. (2011). Integrating task-based instruction as an alternative approach in teaching reading comprehension in English for special purposes: An action research. Theory and practice in Language studies, 1(2), 142-148.
Joe, A. (1998). What effects do text-based tasks promoting generation have on incidental vocabulary acquisition? Applied linguistics, 19(3), 357-377.
Karimkhanlouei, G. (2012). What do Medical Students Need to Learn in Their English Classes?
Malmir, A., Sarem, S. N., & Ghasemi, A. (2011). The Effect of Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) vs. Content-Based. The Iranian EFL Journal, 7(6) 79-94.
Minaabad, M. S., & Khoshkholgh, F. F. (2012). Investigating the Effect of Genre-Based Pedagogy on English for Specific Purpose Learners’ Reading Comprehension. World Applied Sciences Journal, 18(2), 251-260.
McLelland, N. (2017). Teaching and learning foreign languages: A history of language education, assessment and policy in Britain: Taylor & Francis.
Nahavandi, N. (2013). Task-based activities in reading comprehension classes: Task-based language teaching & learning: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
Rahimi, M., & Azhegh, H. (2011). The Impact of TBLT on Mechanical Engineering Students’ achievement And Reading Comprehension In An ESP Course.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching: Cambridge university press.
Willis, J. (1996). A flexible framework for task-based learning. Challenge and change in language teaching, 52-62.
Zand Moghadam, A. (2007). The effect of task-based approach on the Iranian ESP learners reading comprehension. Tehran: Allametabatabaei University.
Zhu, W., & Mitchell, D. A. (2012). Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective. TESOL quarterly, 46(2), 362-386.
