Impact of Teacher’s Dynamic Assessment on Iranian EFL Learners’ Stance in Academic Writing

Subject Areas :

Katayoun Eghtesadi ¹ , Ehsan Rezvani ² , Bahram Hadian ³

1 - English Department, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - English Department, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - English Department, Isfahan (Khorasgan), Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

Received: 2023-02-07 Accepted : 2023-04-10 Published : 2023-07-01

Keywords: موضع قدرتمند. ارزیلبی متناوب. ارزیابی استاد. ارزیابی همکلاسان. نوشتار آکادمیک,

References:

Baily, E. P, & Powel, P. A. (2008). The practical writer by readings. Boston: Thomson Corporation.

Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing.Cambridge: University Press   Cambridge.

Conrad, S, &Biber, D. (2000). Adverbial making of Stance in Speech and Writing”. InS.Hunston &G. Thompson (Eds.), Evaluation in text (pp.56-73). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23, 397-423.

Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2008). From novice to disciplinary expert: Disciplinary identity and genre mastery. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 233-252.

Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of  Pragmatics, 34, 1091-1112.

Hyland, Ken. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of Interaction in Academic Discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.

Hyland, K. (2008b). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: representing self and others in research writing. International Journal of English Studies,8 (2), 8-18

Jones, M. & Haywood, S. (2004). Facilitating the acquisition of formulaic sequences: an exploratory study in an EAP context. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic Sequences. (pp. 269-291). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Lidz, C. S. (1995). Dynamic assessment and the legacy of LS Vygotsky. School Psychology International, 16, 143-153.

Mellati, M. , Alavi, S. M. , & Dashtestani, R. (2022). Reduction of errors in writing assignments: A comparison of the impact of peer, teacher, and mixed feedback. Maritime English Journal, 10(4), 152-166.

Meunier, F. & Granger, S. (Eds.). (2008). Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Nesselhauf, N. (2005). Collocations in a Learner Corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.Oxford English Reference Dictionary(2nded.). (1996). Oxford:Oxford University Press.<oXygen/>XML editor(Version 10). Retrieved July 23, 2007, fromhttp://www.oxygenxml.com/

Rezvani, E. , Esmail, S. M. , Rahul, D. R. , & Patra, I. (2022). : formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia Journal, 12(40), https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468‑022‑00191‑4.

Scollon, R. (1994). As a matter offact: the changing ideology of authorship and responsibility in discourse. World Englishes,13, 34–46.

Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences: acquisition, processing and use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.

Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tzuriel, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of young children. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Zemach,  D. E. and Rumisek, L. A. (2011), Academic Writing from Paragraph to Essay. Britain: Macmillan Press.