تأثیر افزایش متنی بر ساختار مجهول

Subject Areas : آموزش زبان انگلیسی

ایرج خوشنویس ¹ , Zohreh Mikaeli ²

1 - Department of English, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
2 - Department of English, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran

Received: 2013-03-03 Accepted : 2014-04-24 Published : 2012-11-21

Keywords: آموزش صریح و روشن, ورودی, افزایش ورودی, افزایش متنی,

Abstract :

این مطالعه تجربی تأثیر افزایش متنی بر آموزش ساختارمجهول در میان یادگیرندگان زبان دوم ایرانیان درسطح پیش‌متوسطه را بررسیکرد.شصت تا یادگیرندگان زبان دوم در سطح پیش‌متوسطه به‌صورت تصادفی به سه گروه تقسیم شدند دوتا گروه آزمایشی ویک گروه مقایسه. گروه اول آزمایشی متن‌هایی را دریافت کرد که فعل‌های مجهول در آن تکرار شد. گروه دوم آزمایشی متنی را دریافت کرد که در آن فعل‌های مجهول با رنگ‌های مختلف زیرشان خط کشیده شد. گروه سوم فقط توضیحات آشکار مجهول را بدون متن دریافت کرد.گروه تکرار در هر جلسه دو متن دریافت کرد. تحقیق با پیش‌تست/ آموزش/ پست‌تست دنبال شد. نتیجه نشان داد که هر دو گروه افزایش متنی یعنی گروه تکرار و گروه خطوط رنگی تأثیر آماری مهمی در آموزش ساختار مجهول نسبت به گروه آموزش صریح را داشت. در نتیجه گروه تکرار مفیدتر از گروه خطوط رنگی بود.

References:

Alanen, R. (1995). Input Enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition.In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language acquisition (pp. 259–302). Honolulu: University of Hawaii.

Benati,A. (2004).The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of the Italian future  tense. In B.Vanpatten (Ed.), processing Instruction: Theory, Research, and Commentary (pp. 207–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Combs, Ch. (2008).Topic familiarity and input enhancement.Applied Linguistic, 8(2), 229–258.

Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make  a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431–469.

Doughty, C., Williams, J. (1998). Issues and terminology.In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (PP.1–11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, N. (1994). Emergentism, connectionism, and language learning; Language Learning, 48, 631–664.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, N. (1994). Emergentism, connectionism, and language learning; Language Learning, 48, 631–664.

Lee, S. (2007). Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning. Language Learning, 57, 87–118.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lasen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991).An introduction to second language acquisition       research. New York:Longman.

Fahim, M., &Vaezi, R. (2011). Investigation the effect of visually enhancement input on the acquisition of lexical collocations by Iranian intermediate EFL learners: A case of verb-noun lexical collocation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 552–560.

Long, M., (1991). Focus on form: a design feature in language teaching methodology. In:de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R.Kramsch, C. (Eds.), Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective. John Benjamin, Amsterdam, PP. 39–52.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition.InW.C. Ritchie & T.K.       Bathia (Eds), Handbook of second language acquisition. San             Diego: Academic Press, PP. 413–468.

Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and      quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528.

Overstreet, M. (1998). Text enhancement and content familiarity: The focus of learnerattention. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 2, 229–258.

Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and fundamental similarity of explicit andimplicit second language learning .Language Learning, 47, 45–99.

Schmidt, R. (1990).The role of consciousness in second language learning. AppliedLinguistics, 11, 129–158.

Schmidt, R. (1993). Awareness and second language acquisition. Annual Review of AppliedLinguistics, 13, 206–26.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: CUP.

Sharwood Smith, M. (1991). Speaking to many minds: On the relevance of different types of language information for the   L2 learner. Second Language researcher, 7, 118–132.

Sharwood Smith, M. (1981).Consciousness-raising and Second language acquisition theory.Applied Linguistics, 2, 159–168.

Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input Enhancement in Instructed SLA: Theoretical Bases,Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 165–179.

Tomlin, R. S., &Villa,V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183–203.

White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 12, 22–161.

Wong, W. (2003). Textual Enhancement and simplified input: Effects on L2 comprehensionand acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning,13, 109–132.