آموزش استراتژی خودتنظیم گر بر درستی و انسجام نوشتار در بین فراگیران ایرانی زبان انگلیسی

Subject Areas : آموزش زبان انگلیسی

طیبه عیوضی ¹ ( Department of English Language, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran )
Iraj Khoshnevis ² ( Department of English Language, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran )

Received: 2017-02-23 Accepted : 2017-02-23 Published : 2016-11-01

Keywords: نوشتار, انسجام, درستی, آموزش استراتژی, استراتژی خودتنظیم گر,

Abstract :

این مطالعه به بررسی تاثیر آموزش استراتژی خودتنظیم گر بر درستی و انسجام نوشتار در بین فراگیران ایرانی زبان انگلیسی می پردازد. بدین منظور، این تحقیق مدل تدریس اس آر اس را دنبال کرد که این مدل شامل یک تابلو انتقال لغات، مثال ها، و تنظیمگر تصویری بود. برای حصول به اهداف، 50 فراگیر ایرانی زبان انگلیسی که در سطح متوسط قرار داشتند در این مطالعه شرکت داده شدند. طرح تحقیق از نوع تجربی بود که در آن امتحان تعیین سطح، پیش و پس آزمون و نمونه گیری تصادفی به کار گرفته شد. تحلیل های آزمون های نوشتاری در گروههای کنترل و آزمایش، نشانگر تاثیر آموزش استراتژی خودتنظیم گر بر توانایی نوشتاری نمونه های مورد مطالعه بود. یافته ها حاکی از آن بود که مدرسان زبان به بعد فراشناختی نوشتار و به اهمیت آموزش استراتژیهای خودتنظیم گر به مثابه راهی برای دستیابی به استقلال نوشتاری، واقف شده و بدآن توجه نمودند. 

References:

Chiang, S. Y. (1999). Assessing grammatical and textual features in L2 writing samples: The case of French as a foreign language. Modern Language Journal, 83, 219- 232.

Cox, B. E., Shanahan, T., & Tinzmann, M. B. (1991). Children’s knowledge of organization, cohesion, and voice in written exposition. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 179-218.

Cuenca-Sanchez, Y. (2008). Self-regulated strategy development through a critical literacy approach: Teaching students with disabilities to write persuasively by   understanding the word and the world. Retrieved May 22, 2011, from  http://mason.gmu.edu/~ycuencas/documents/ Literacy course EDRD  830/Final Paper Literacy 05.12.08a.pdf.

De La Paz, S. (1999). Self-regulated instruction in regular educational settings: Improving outcomes for students with and without learning disability. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 14(2), 92-106.

De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 687–698.

García, J. N., & Fidalgo, R. (2006). Effects of two self-regulatory instruction programs in students with learning disabilities in writing products, process and self-efficacy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 181-213.

Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the center on accelerating student learning. Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 19-33.

Griffiths, C. (2008). Lessons from good language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. H. (2003). Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 35, 1-16.

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Johnson, P. (1987). Cohesion and coherence in compositions in Malay and in English. RELC Journal, 23, 1-17.

Kroll, B. (1990). What does time buy? ESL student performance on home versus class compositions. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second language writing: Research insight for the classroom (pp. 140-154). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lavelle, E. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy for writing. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4(8), 73-84.

Mason, L. H., Benedek-Wood, E., & Valasa, L. (2009). Teaching low-achieving students to self-regulate persuasive quick write responses. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53(4), 302-312.

Mason, L. H., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2002). Every child has a story to tell: Self-regulated strategy development for story writing. Education and Treatment of Children, 25, 496-506.

McCulley, G. A. (1985). Writing quality, coherence, and cohesion. Research in the Teaching of English, 19, 269-282.

Muncie, J. (2000). Using written teacher feedback in EFL composition classes. ELT Journal, 54(1), 47-53.

Rogers, R. J., (2010). Incorporating metacognitive strategy training in ESP writing instruction: English for lawyers. English Language Teaching 3(4), 3-9.

Saddler, B. (2006). Increasing story writing ability through self-regulated strategy development: Effects on young writers with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29(4), 291-305.

Saddler, B., Moran, S., Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2004). Preventing writing difficulties: The effects of planning strategy instruction on the writing performance of struggling writers. Exceptionality, 12(1), 3-17.

Santangelo, T., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2008). Self-Regulated strategy development in writing. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 36(5), 395-408.

Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulated as a framework for implementing strategy instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 16, 57–71.

Spiegel, D. L., & Fitzgerald, J. (1990). Textual cohesion and coherence in children’s writing revisited. Research in the Teaching of English, 24, 48-66.

Sweedler-Brown, C. O. (1993). ESL essay evaluation: The influence of sentence level and rhetorical features. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 3-17.

Tierney, R. J., & Mosenthal, J. H. (1983). Cohesion and textual coherence. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 215-229.

Witte, S. P., & Faigley. L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion and writing quality. College Composition and Communication, 32, 189-204.