Paralinguistic Cues and EFL Learners’ Speaking Fluency: A Study of First-Year Undergraduate Students of Gonabad University
Subject Areas : آموزش زبان انگلیسی
1 - گروه زبان انگلیسی- دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی- مجتمع آموزش عالی گناباد- گناباد- ایران
Keywords: Learning, Communication, Setting, Persian, Cross-cultural,
Abstract :
Paralinguistic features are indispensable and crucial aspects of communication without which any utterance would lose its identity. On the other hand, confusion in cross-cultural communication is most often assigned to paralinguistic features. Despite the significant importance of paralinguistic clues in humans’ communication, only limited studies have tackled this issue. More specifically, despite the fact that paralinguistic features are culturally different, no study has investigated the possible relationship between these features and speaking performance of Persian-speaking learners of English. Hence, with this existing gap in the literature, in this study, we tried to scrutinize the impact of paralinguistic cues upon EFL learners’ speaking fluency in the Persian setting. To this objective, we recruited 40 first-year undergraduate female students of Linguistics at the University of Gonabad, utilizing non-random sampling method. Their English proficiency level was determined as lower-intermediate via the administration of Quick Oxford Placement Test. In our pre-test post-test experimental research, we allocated a five-week span of instruction for the purpose of teaching paralinguistic clues to the experimental group to see whether it could have a significant positive impact upon their speaking performance. The instrument we utilized to evaluate speaking capability of our participants was Researcher-Made Speaking Test. The results of our study demonstrated that utilizing paralinguistic features boosted students’ speaking capability. On the light of our finding, it could be concluded that paralinguistic features could be employed for the first-year undergraduate students to enhance their communicative performance. Future studies in diverse EFL settings, could shed light on this conclusion.
Abramson, L., Petranker, R., Marom, I., & Aviezer, H. (2021). Social interaction context shapes emotion recognition through body language, not facial expressions. Emotion, 21(3), 557.
Aguado-Jiménez, P., Pérez-Paredes, P., & Sánchez, P. (2012). Exploring the use of multidimensional analysis of learner language to promote register awareness. System, 40(1), 90-103.
Alakrash, H., Edam, B., Bustan, E., Armnazi, M., Enayat, A., & Bustan, T. (2021). Developing English Language Skills and Confidence Using Local Culture-Based Materials in EFL Curriculum. Linguistica aniverpiensia, 548-564.
Al-Shboul, M. M., Ahmad, I. S., Nordin, M. S., & Rahman, Z. A. (2013). Foreign language anxiety and achievement: Systematic review. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3(2), 32.
Amengual-Pizarro, M. (2018). Foreign language classroom anxiety among English for Specific Purposes (ESP) students. International Journal of English Studies, 18(2), 145-159.
Andersen, P.A. (2004). The complete idiots guide to body language. Indianapolis IN: Alpha Books.
Azeez, R. A., & Azeez, P. Z. (2018). Incorporating body language into EFL teaching. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 36-45.
Azizifar, A., Faryadian, E., & Gowhary, H. (2014). The Effect of anxiety on Iranian EFL learners speaking skill. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 8(10), 1747-1754.
Behnam, B., Jenani, S., & Ahangari, S. (2014). The effect of time-management training on test-anxiety and self-efficacy of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 2(1), 45-61.
Bielak, J. (2018). The effect of strategy instruction on english majors’ use of affective strategies and anxiety levels. In: Challenges of second and foreign language education in a globalized world (pp. 227-249): Springer.
Birdwhistell, R. I. (1970). Kinesics and context: Essays on body motion communication. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Blount, B. G., & Padgug, E. J. (1977). Prosodic, paralinguistic, and interactional features in parent-child speech: English and Spanish. Journal of Child Language, 4(1), 67-86.
Chen, J. C. (2018). The interplay of tasks, strategies and negotiations in Second Life. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 960-986.
Crystal, D. (2019). Paralinguistics. In Current trends in linguistics (pp. 265-296): De Gruyter Mouton.
Falout, J. (2012). Coping with Demotivation: EFL Learners' Remotivation Processes. TESL-EJ, 16(3), n3.
Getie, A. S. (2020). Factors affecting the attitudes of students towards learning English as a foreign language. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1738184.
Gholamshahi, A., & Pazhakh, A. (2016). The effect of explicit teaching paralinguistic features on Ira-nian EFL learners’ performance in English conversation in EFL context.
Goris, J., Denessen, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2019). The contribution of CLIL to learners’ international orientation and EFL confidence. The Language Learning Journal, 47(2), 246-256.
Hailu, A. (2012). Time management skills of summer students: the case of EFL learners at AAU. Ethiopian Journal of Language and Literature, 12(1), 23-41.
Haji-karim, A., & Sotoudehnama, E. (2017). A qualitative study on teacher’s nonverbal communication and Iranian EFL learners’ perception of language learning. Journal of Language Horizons, 1(1), 109-133
Hanifa, R. (2018). Factors generating anxiety when learning EFL speaking skills. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 230-239.
Irgin, P. (2017). Paralinguistics in spoken English: Investigating the use of proxemics and kinesics in an EFL context. International Journal of Linguistics, 9 (3), 64-78.
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Acquiring a second language. World Englishes, 1(3), 97-101.
Lieberman, P. (2011). Linguistic and paralinguistic interchange: De Gruyter Mouton.
Martínez-Flor, A., Usó-Juan, E., & Soler, E. A. (2008). Towards acquiring communicative competence through speaking. In Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 139-158): De Gruyter Mouton.
McNulty, A., & Lazarevic, B. (2012). Best practices in using video technology to promote second language acquisition. Teaching English with Technology, 12(3), 49-61.
Mutlu, G., & Yıldırım, A. (2019). Learning environment perceptions and student background variables as determinants of persistence in EFL learning. SAGE Open, 9(4), 2158244019898805.
Nurhayati, D. A. W. (2016). Using local drama in writing and speaking: EFL learners’ creative expression. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 1(1), 51-77.
Qiang, K. A. N. G. (2013). Paralanguage. Canadian Social Science, 9(6), 222-226.
Rouhani, A. (2008). An investigation into emotional intelligence, foreign language anxiety and empathy through a cognitive-affective course in an EFL context. Linguistik online, 34(2).
Schuller, B., S. Steidl, A. Batliner, F. Burkhardt, L. Devillers, C. MüLler, and S. Narayanan. (2013). Paralinguistics in Speech and Language—State-of-the-art and the Challenge. Computer Speech & Language 27 (1): 4–39.
Sağlamel, H., & Kayaoğlu, M. N. (2013). Creative drama: A possible way to alleviate foreign language anxiety. RELC Journal, 44(3), 377-394.
Schandorf, M. (2013). Mediated gesture: Paralinguistic communication and phatic text. Convergence, 19(3), 319-344.
Skelly, K. J., & Estrada-Chichon, J. L. (2021). Mindfulness as a Coping Strategy for EFL Learning in Education. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3).
Sumekto, D. R., & Setyawati, H. (2020). Revealing lecturer’s paralinguistic attribution: How the visual manner contributes to students’ non-cognitive skills. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 559-571.
Sun, Q., & Yang, Z. (2022). ‘We lose a lot of value’: feedback on English for academic purposes speaking skills in online teaching in a UK-China joint-venture university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(4), 622-635.
Sutrisna, I. P. E. (2020). Kinesics in EFL Language Teaching. Yavana Bhasha: Journal of English Language Education, 3(2), 27-35.
Tavil, Z. M. (2010). Integrating listening and speaking skills to facilitate English language learners’ communicative competence. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 765-770.
Uştuk, Ö., & Aydın, S. (2018). The effects of the use of paralinguistic cues on foreign language anxiety among English as a foreign language speakers. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 12(3), 289-302.
Vaezi, S., & Fallah, N. (2012). Sense of humor and emotional intelligence as predictors of stress among EFL teachers. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(3), 584-591.
Wang, Y., Xie, G., & Cui, X. (2016). Effects of emotional intelligence and selfleadership on students' coping with stress. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 44(5), 853-864.
Williams, K. E., & Andrade, M. R. (2008). Foreign language learning anxiety in Japanese EFL university classes: Causes, coping, and locus of control. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2), 181-191.
Zarrinabadi, N., & Saberi Dehkordi, E. (2021). The effects of reference of comparison (self-referential vs. normative) and regulatory focus (promotion vs. prevention) feedback on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Language Teaching Research, 13621688211013618.
Sumekto, D. R., & Setyawati, H. (2020). Revealing lecturer’s paralinguistic attribution: How the visual manner contributes to students’ non-cognitive skills. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 559-571.
