Identifying the Barriers in Implementing Entrepreneurship and Innovation policy in Development Plans of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Subject Areas : Other

Ebrahim  Aliabadi ¹ (professor)
Mohammad  Azizi ² (Associate Professor Univercity of Tehran)
Akbar  Aalam Tabriz ³ (Associate Professor Univercity Shahid Beheshti)
Ali  Davari ⁴ (Associate Professor Univercity of Tehran)

Received: 2018-05-31 Accepted : 2019-03-09 Published : 2019-03-17

Keywords: barriers, Innovation, entrepreneurship development, Policy implementation,

Abstract :

Background:Proper and desirable implementation of entrepreneurship policies as a driver of innovation and economic growth plays a key role in economic development and the emergence of knowledge-based economies. The implementation phase is one of the most important and challenging stages of the policy process. This stage is the starting point for realizing the goals. Several factors can play a role in the implementation of a policy. The researchers, in their turn, described the factors influencing the successful implementation of a script, pgnoring attention to these factors con challenge the implementation of the policies. Purpose: The objective of this research is to achieve the most important barriers in the implementation of development programs in the field of entrepreneurship. Method: This study was conducted in terms of practical purpose, collecting qualitative data and using a deep interview technique with 14 experts and development program executives. The purposeful sampling method and the criterion for determining the sample size is the theoretical saturation obtained in the 12th theoretical saturation, Also for data analysis, open and axial coding was used. Findings: obstacles include: the nature (the lack of a single custodian, the lack of the standardization of laws, the multiplicity of rules and the non-alignment of the rules), participatory (lack of participation of actors and lack of Stakeholder participation), executives (lack of commitment and accountability in the executives, lack of appropriate training for administrators, weaknesses and inefficiencies of the executives, lack of proper coordination between executives and change of effective implementers), environmental barriers (conditions Inappropriate environment, inadequate administrative structure, inadequate political will, and lack of commitment Implementation (no need for implementation, inadequate execution time, lack of implementation tools and inadequate implementation capacity), and regulatory (lack of proper oversight of implementation, lack of enforcement, the existence of devices and independent monitoring system, inappropriate tools Evaluation and non-receipt and reflection feedback). Conclusion: According to the results of this research, the country's most reliable way to achieve the goals set out in the development plans is to create an appropriate structure for the formulation of desirable polices, the determination of the executor and the use of comments, stakeholders.

References:

 الوانی، مهدی، تصمیم­گیری و خط­مشی دولتی، تهران: سمت، 1376 ،ص. 13.

ایمانی، عبدالمجید؛ یعقوبی، نورمحمد و مبارکی، مسلم. (13۹۶). شناسایی و اولویت­بندی خط­مشی­های توسعه کارآفرینی بخش تعاون. نشریه توسعه کارآفرینی، دوره۱۰، شماره۱، ۲۱-۳۹.

 رزقی رستمی، علیرضا (1383)، آسیب­شناسی اجرای خط­مشی­های صنعتی کشور و ارایه الگوی پیشنهادی، رساله دکتری. دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی (واحد علوم و تحقیقات).

دانایی فرد. (1388). روش شناسی تدوین خط مشی ملی کارآفرینی کشور: چارچوب مفهومی. نشریه توسعه کارآفرینی، شماره6 ، 125-155.

دانایی فرد، حسن؛ مقدس­­پور، سعید؛ و کردتائیج، اسدا... . (13۹۲). واکاوی عوامل کلیدی در عدم موفقیت برخی خط­مشی­های عمومی در ج.ا. ایران: مطالعه خط­مشی­های مالیاتی کشور. فصلنامه مدیریت فرهنگ سازمانی، دوره یازدهم، شماره اول ، ۳۳-۶۸.

رحمتی، محمدحسین؛ مقیمی، سیدمخمد؛ و الوانی، سیدمهدی . (13۸۹). تحلیل نظام خط­مشی­گذاری برای آموزش غیررسمی کارآفرینی در ایران. نشریه توسعه کارآفرینی، سال سوم، شماره نهم ، ۷-۳۵.

رضایی، بیژن؛ عباس­پور، عباس؛ نیکنامی، مصطفی؛ رحیمیان، حمید و دلاور، علی. (13۹۲). واکاوی راهکارهای بهبود کارآفرینی دانشگاهی در حوزه علوم انسانی و ارائه یک نظریه زمینه­ای. فصلنامه ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، دوره سوم، شماره۲، ۱۸۵ -۲۱5 .

عباسی، طیبه؛ و بیگی، وحید . (13۹۵). تبیین چالش­های اجرای خط­مشی­های عمومی در حوزه علوم، تحقیقات و فناوری. فصلنامه سیاست علم و فناوری، سال هشتم، شماره ۳، 1-12.

عبداللهی، حسین؛ آقامحمدی، جواد؛ عباس­پور، عباس و دلاور، علی. (13۹۶). تحلیل ویژگی­های شخصیتی کارآفرینی در بین دانش­آموزان دوره اول آموزش متوسطه (مطالعه موردی استان کردستان). فصلنامه ابتکار و خلاقیت در علوم انسانی، دوره هفتم، شماره۱، ۴۹ -۷۰ .

قانون برنامه چهارم توسعه جمهوری اسلامی ایران(1389-1384) مورخ 11/06/1383 مجلس شورای اسلامی، روزنامه رسمی کشور، مورخ29/07/1383، شماره 17375.

قانون برنامه پنجم توسعه جمهوری اسلامی ایران(1394-1390) مورخ 15/10/1389 مجلس شورای اسلامی، روزنامه رسمی کشور، مورخ28/10/1389، شماره 16470.

قانون برنامه ششم توسعه جمهوری اسلامی ایران(1400-1396) مورخ 10/11/1395 مجلس شورای اسلامی، روزنامه رسمی کشور، مورخ21/01/1396، شماره 20995.

قلی­پور رحمت­اله (۱۳۸۷). تصمیم­گیری سازمانی و خط­مشی­گذاری عمومی. انتشارات سمت.

مریدسادات، پگاه؛ رکن­الدین افتخاری، عبدالرضا؛ پورطاهری، مهدی؛ و شعبانعلی فمی، حسین. (13۹۶). واکاوی وضعیت کارآفرینی پایدار در سیاست­های کلان و بخشی کشاورزی جمهوری اسلامی ایران. فصلنامه پژوهش­های روستایی، دوره ۸، شماره۱، ۸۲ -۹۸ .

نعمتی, م. (1390). چالش ها و چشم­اندازهای تحقق جامعه کارآفرین در ایران 1404. مجموعه مقالات همایش کار آفرینی در ایران 1404. تهران.

هاولت مایکل و رامش، ام. مطالعه خط مشی عمومی. ترجمة عباس منوریـان و ابـراهیم گلـشن، تهـران: مرکـز آمـوزش مدیریت دولتی، 1380

وکیلی, الوانی, محمدی الیاسی, قنبر. (1393). تبیین نقش عوامل محیطی در توسعه کارآفرینی در بخش عمومی. نشریه توسعه کارآفرینی، سال دوم، شماره۷، 191-210.‎

 

Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small business economics, 28(2-3), 109-122.

Alvarez, C., Urbano, D., Coduras, A., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2011). Environmental conditions and entrepreneurial activity: a regional comparison in Spain. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 18(1), 120-140.

Arshed, N., Carter, S., & Mason, C. (2014). The ineffectiveness of entrepreneurship policy: is policy formulation to blame?. Small Business Economics, 43(3), 639-659.‏

Audretsch, D. B. (2003). Entrepreneurship policy and the strategic management of places. The emergence of entrepreneurship policy: Governance, start-ups, and growth in the US knowledge economy, 20-38.

Audretsch, D. B., Grilo, I., & Thurik, A. R. (2007). Explaining entrepreneurship and the role of policy: a framework. The handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy, 1-17.

Bager, T. E., Klyver, K., & Nielsen, P. S. (2015). Special interest in decision making in entrepreneurship policy. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(4), 680-697.

Bennett, R. J. (2014). Entrepreneurship, small business and public policy: Evolution and revolution: Routledge.

Brynard, P. (2005). Policy implementation: Lessons for service delivery. Journal of public administration, 40(Special issue 3), 649-664.

Cassim, S., Soni, P., & Karodia, A. M. (2014). Entrepreneurship Policy in South Africa. Oman Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 34(2347), 1-15.

Dennis Jr, W. J. (2011). Entrepreneurship, small business and public policy levers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 92-106.

Filipovic, S., & Petrakovic, D. (2015). SME sector development by improving financial support: Serbia compared to other SEE countries. South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, 3(2).

Gilbert, B. A., Audretsch, D. B., & McDougall, P. P. (2004). The emergence of entrepreneurship policy. Small business economics, 22(3-4), 313-323.

Hadjimanolis, A. (2008). Entrepreneurship policy in Cyprus. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 6(4), 562-582.

Hannon, P. D. (2006). Teaching pigeons to dance: sense and meaning in entrepreneurship education. Education Training, 48(5), 296-308.

Hart, D. M. (2003). The emergence of entrepreneurship policy: governance, start-ups, and growth in the US knowledge economy: Cambridge University Press.

Henrekson, M., & Stenkula, M. (2010). Entrepreneurship and public policy. In Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 595-637): Springer.

Hölzl, W. (2010). The economics of entrepreneurship policy: introduction to the special issue. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 10(3-4), 187-197.

Ingram, H., & Schneider, A. (1990). Improving implementation through framing smarter statutes. Journal of Public Policy, 10(1), 67-88.

Jafari-Moghadam, S., Zali, M., & Sanaeepour, H. (2017). Tourism entrepreneurship policy: a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP (DANP). Decision Science Letters, 6(3), 233-250.

Jennings, P. L., Perren, L., & Carter, S. (2005). Guest editors’ introduction: Alternative perspectives on entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(2), 145-152.

Khalid, H. M. (2001). Policy implementation models: the case of library and documentation services in Pakistan, 1998-2008. New library world, 102(3), 87-92.

Kim, Y., Kim, W., & Yang, T. (2010). The effect of public policy on entrepreneurial activity: Evidence from OECD countries. Paper presented at the ICSB World Conference Proceedings.

Kuratko, D. F. (2003). Entrepreneurship education: Emerging trends and challenges for the 21st century. White Paper, US Association of Small Business Education, 22, 2003.

Lucky, E. O. I. (2013). Exploring the ineffectiveness of government policy on entrepreneurship in Nigeria. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 19(4), 471-487.‏

Lundström, A., & Stevenson, L. A. (2005). Entrepreneurship Policy Typologies. Entrepreneurship Policy: Theory and Practice, 117-152.

Makinde, T. (2005). Problems of policy implementation in developing nations: The Nigerian experience. Journal of Social sciences, 11(1), 63-69.

Minniti, M., & Lévesque, M. (2008). Recent developments in the economics of entrepreneurship. In: Elsevier.

Mirzanti, I. R., Simatupang, T. M., & Larso, D. (2015). Mapping on entrepreneurship policy in Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169, 346-353.‏

Pittaway, L. (2005). Philosophies in entrepreneurship: a focus on economic theories. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 11(3), 201-221.

Redford, D. T. (2012). Entrepreneurship and Public Policy in Today and Tomorrow’s Portuguese republic. University of California.

Scott, W. G. (2004). Public policy failure in health care. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, Fl, 5(1&2), 88-94.

So, H. (1992). Factors affecting the implementation of democratic school management policy in the Republic of Korea.

Stevenson, L., & Lundström, A. (2001). Patterns and trends in entrepreneurship/SME policy and practice in ten economies (Vol. 3): Elanders Gotab Vällingby, Sweden.

Stevenson, L., & Lundström, A. (2002). Beyond the rhetoric: Defining entrepreneurship policy and its best practice components.

Stevenson, L., & Lundström, A. (2007). Dressing the emperor: the fabric of entrepreneurship policy. Handbook of research on entrepreneurship policy, 94-129.

Stevenson, L. A. (2005). Entrepreneurship Policy: Theory and Practice. International Studies in Entrepreneurship: Springer.

Tsai, W.-H., & Kuo, H.-C. (2011). Entrepreneurship policy evaluation and decision analysis for SMEs. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8343-8351.

-UNCTAD, (2010). Entrepreneurship education policies. http://unctad.org/en/Docs/ciimem1crp2_en.pdf

Winter, S. (1990). Integrating implementation research. In Implementation and the policy process (pp. 19-38): Greenwood Press.