مطالعه سبک تغییرات جنسیتی و بین فرهنگی در مقالات آیلتس
Subject Areas : Applied Linguistics
1 - Department of English, Maragheh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maragheh, Iran
Keywords: تحلیل ژانر, نویسندگان بومی و غیر بومی, نوشتن آیلتس, تحلیل حرکت,
Abstract :
نوشتن مقالات از دیرباز به عنوان شیوه ای مهم برای گفتار نوشتاری در نظر گرفته شده است که برای دانش آموزان ، به ویژه برای زبان آموزان انگلیسی (EFL) ، یک متن دشوار است. نوشتن مقاله همچنین بخش مهمی از سیستم آزمون بین المللی زبان انگلیسی (IELTS) را تشکیل می دهد ، به عنوان یکی از معتبرترین آزمون های انگلیسی که برای ارزیابی مهارت زبان افرادی که قصد تحصیل یا کار در زمینه انگلیسی زبان را دارند مورد استفاده قرار می گیرد. این پژوهش یک تجزیه و تحلیل ژانر متضاد از مقالاتی است که توسط مردان و زنان و نویسندگان بومی و غیر بومی در آزمونهای مقاله ای IELTS task 2 ارائه شده است. هدف اصلی مطالعه این است که آیا نویسندگان بومی و غیر بومی از تکنیک های بلاغی یکسانی در نوشتن مقالات آیلتس استفاده کرده اند یا خیر. مطالعه بر اساس چارچوب حرکت ژانرهای Swales (1990) ، این مدل ، مدلی اصلاح شده از چارچوب حرکت ژانر Swales (1990) را برای مقالات استدلالی برای تعدیل تفاوت های مشاهده شده پیشنهاد کرد. یافته ها تفاوت هایی بین نویسندگان مرد و زن ، بومی و غیر بومی در نوشتن این مقالات آیلتس نشان می دهد. این مقاله دارای مفاهیم نظری و مفاهیم آموزشی قابل توجهی برای معلمان ، زبان آموزان ، توسعه دهندگان مواد و طراحان برنامه درسی نیز می باشد.
Ahmad, U. (1997). Research articles in Malay: rhetoric in an emerging research community. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse. Austin, TX: De Gruyter.
Alderson, J. C. (1988b). New procedures for validating proficiency tests of ESP? Theory and practice. Language Testing, 5(2), 220-232.
Al-Haq, F., & Al-Sobh, M. A. (2010). The effect of a web-based writing instructional EFL program enhancing the performance of Jordanian secondary students. The Jalt Call Journal, 6(3), 189–218.
Bawarshi, A., & Reiff, M. J. (2010). Genre: An introduction to History, Theory, Research, and Pedagogy. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press/WAC Clearinghouse.
Bhatia, V. (1993) Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
Bhatia, V. (2004). Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-based View. London: A&C Black.
Bhatia. V. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London
Blundell, S. (2007). International students & English language skills: Strategies for success. Paper presented at the Australian International Education Conference Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.aiec.idp.com/past_papers/2007.aspx
Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 47–59.
Bunton, D. (1999). The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses. English for Specific Purposes, 18, S41–S56.
Bunton, D. (2002). Generic Moves in PhD Thesis Introductions. In J. Flowerdew (Ed.), Academic discourse (pp. 57–75). London: Longman.
Charles, M. (2003). This mystery . . .: A corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(4), 313–326.
Condon, W., &Kelly-Riley, D. (2004). Assessing and teaching what we value: The relationship between college-level writing and critical thinking abilities. Assessing Writing,2(9),56–75.
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive Rhetoric. Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second-Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Connor, U., & Mauranen, A. (1999). Linguistic analysis of grant proposals. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 47–62.
Dudley-Evans, A. (1994). Genre analysis: an approach to text analysis for ESP. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis. London: Routledge.
Ezeifeka, C. R. (2014). Grammatical metaphor in SFL: A rhetorical resource for academic writing. UJAH: Unizik: Journal of Arts and Humanities, 12(1), 207-221.
Graddol, D. (2006). English Next. London: The British Council.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Oxon & New York: Routledge.
Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321–337.
Humphrey, S. L., & Economou, D. (2015). Peeling the onion–A textual model of critical analysis. English for Academic Purposes, 17(4), 37-50.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourse: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
Hyland, K. (2007). Applying a gloss: Exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 266–285.
IELTS Worldwide. (2011). Test-taker performance 2010. Retrieved from http://www.ielts.org/ researchers/analysis_of_test_data/test_taker_performance_2010.aspx.
Jalilifar, A. (2010). Research article introductions: Sub-disciplinary variations in applied linguistics. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 2(2), 29-55.
Johns, A.M. (Ed.). (2002). Genre in the Classroom: Multiple Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Joseph, R., Lim, J., & Nor, N. (2014). Communicative moves in forestry research introductions: Implications for the design of learning materials. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134,53e69.
Kwan, B. (2006). The schematic structure of literature reviews in doctoral theses of applied linguistics. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 30–55
Lin, B. (2006). Genre-based teaching and Vygotskyian principles in EFL: The case of a university writing course. Asian EFL Journal, 8 (3), 226-248.
Lindeberg, A. (1994). Rhetorical conventions in the discussion/conclusion sections of research articles in finance, management and marketing. In M. Brekke, O. Anderson, T. Dahl, & J. Myking (Eds.), Applications and implications of current LSP research. Proceedings of the 9th European LSP Symposium, Bergen, Norway, August 1993 (pp. 761–779). Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget.
Martin, J. R. (1984). Language, Register and Genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Children writing: Reader (pp. 21-29). Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
Melander, B., Swales, J. M., & Frederickson, K. M. (1997). Journal abstracts from three academic fields in the United States and Sweden: National or disciplinary proclivities? In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Moore, T. & Morton, J. (2005). Dimensions of difference: a comparison of university writing and IELTS writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (4), 43-66.
Ong, J. (2011). Investigating the use of cohesive devices by Chinese EFL learners. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 11(3), 42–65.
Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2017). Introduction to Academic Writing. Pearson Longman.
Paltridge, B. (2002). Thesis and dissertation writing: An examination of published advice and actual practice. English for Specific Purposes, 21, 125–143.
Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30 (4), 479-497.
Raimes, A. (1990). The TOEFL Test of Written English: Causes for concern. TESOL Quarterly, 24 (3), 427-442.
Richards, J., & Renandya, W. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ridley, D. (2000). The different guises of a PhD thesis and the role of a literature review. In P. Thompson (Ed.), Patterns and perspectives: Insights into EAP writing practice (pp. 61–76). Reading: University of Reading.
Rivers, W. M. (1981). Teaching Foreign Language Skills (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master’s thesis across disciplines with a focus on introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(1), 55-67.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (1981). Aspects of Article Introductions. Birmingham, UK: University of Aston, Language Studies Unit.
Swales, J. M., & Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written Communication, 4 (2), 175–191.
Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions (Aston ESP research report no. 1). Language Studies Unit, The University of Aston, Birmingham.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Swales, John M., and Feak, Christine B. (2004). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Tardy, C. M. (2006). Researching first and second language genre learning: A comparative review and a look ahead. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 79–101.
Thompson, P. (2001). A pedagogically-motivated corpus-based examination of Ph.D. theses: macrostructure, citation practices and uses of modal verbs. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Reading: University of Reading.
Thompson, P. (2005). Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in Ph.D. theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4 (2), 307–323.
Tseng, F. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 27e39.
Umar, I., & Ratharkrishnam, M. (2012). The effects of online teachers’ social role and learning style on students’ essay writing performance and critical thinking in a wiki environment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46 (4), 5730–5735.
Yang, R., & Allison, D. (2003). RAs in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes, 4(22), 365e384.
