Validating the basic components of the College student’s curriculum By using structural confirmation analysis

Subject Areas : Research in Curriculum Planning

Fatemeh Abadi ¹ , mohammad javadipour ² , rezvan hakimzadeh ³ , reza sajady ⁴

1 - PhD Student of Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
2 - Associate Professor of Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
3 - Associate Professor of Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.
4 - PhD Student of Curriculum Studies, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University (SBU), Tehran, Iran.

Received: 2017-05-22 Accepted : 2018-11-06 Published : 2019-03-21

Keywords: Curriculum, Higher Education, Structural Approach Analysis, College Student’s Curriculum,

Abstract :

The purpose of this study was to determine the validation of the components obtained about the College student’s curriculum. The present research has been accomplished in both practical and analytic approaches. The study type is basic research, in terms of approach it is analytical and also an exploratory mixed-type projects in which one qualitative and one quantitative techniques were utilized. Performing open-ended interviews with some experts in the field of “Education & Learning Programming” at university of Tehran, the 3-stages Strauss and Corbin method was used in qualitative part based on grounded Theory method. In the quantitative part, an analysis of the confirmatory structure and Friedman test was used. Based on 100 observation points, the theoretical framework was tested using AMOS software. Four main criteria obtained: (1) Features of the curriculum (overt and covert); (2) The main components (college student, faculty and university as an organization); (3) Stages of formation (basic factors and motivating factors, i.e. triggers); and (4) The obstacles and challenges through the formation and Confirmatory structure analysis results confirmed these components.

References:

Aminbeidokhti, Ali Akbar, Rastgar, Abbasali, & Nameni, Ahmad. (2015). A future study on higher education approaches in training human capital: A plausible scenario for 2030. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 21(3), 31-55.

Arefi, Mhbobeh. (2005). Strategic curriculum in higher education.: Agah. [persian]

Cremin, L.A. (1961/1964). The Transformation of the School: Progressivism in American Education.

Din, N., Haron, Sh., & Rashid, M. (2016). Can Self-directed Learning Environment Improve Quality of Life? Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 18.

Fathi Vajargah, kourosh. (2014). Curriculum Development in Higher Education: Ketabemehraban. [persian]

Huang, CH. (2016). Achievement goals and self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 19, 18.

Knowles, M. S.. (1982). Andragogy in Action. Applying Modern Principles of Adult Education: San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

                       

                          

1. Focus group

   Mahrmohammadi, Mahmood. (2002). Curriculum, Theories, Approaches and

 

Perspectives.: Astane Ghods Razavi. [persian]

Medrano, L., Flores-Kanter, E., Moretti, L., & Pereno, L. (2016). Effects of induction of positive and negative emotional states on academic self-efficacy beliefs in college students.. Psicología Educativa, 22(2), 6.

Pereiraa, D., Floresb, M., Margarida, A., Simãoc, V., & Barros, A.. (2016). Effectiveness and relevance of feedback in Higher Education: A study of undergraduate students., 49, 8.

Pinar, W. F.. (2000). What Is Curriculum Theory?: UK: Routledge.

Pop, E., Negru-Subtirica, O., Crocetti, E., Opre, A., & Meeus, W.. (2016). On the interplay between academic achievement and educational identity: A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 47, 9.

Schubert, W. (1986). Curriculum: New York: Macmillan.

Seif, Aliakbar. (2009). Modern educational psychology (Psychology of Learning and Teaching): Doran Press. [persian]

Stark, J. S. (2000). Planning introductory college courses: Content, context and form. Instructional Science, 28(5), 25.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J.. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.: Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Zhoc, C.H., & Chen, G. (2016). Reliability and validity evidence for the Self-Directed Learning Scale (SDLS). . Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 5.