The Effects of Simultaneous Use of Task-based Strategic and Careful Online Planning on EFL Learners’ Self-repairs

Subject Areas : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Masoud Saeidi ¹

1 - Department of English Language and Literature, Payame Noor University, Iran

Received: 2019-10-12 Accepted : 2019-12-31 Published : 2020-01-01

Keywords:

References:

Ahmadian, M. J. (2012). The effects of guided careful online planning on complexity, accuracy, and fluency in intermediate EFL learners’ oral production: The case of English articles. Language Teaching Research, 16, 129-149.

Ahmadian, M. J., Abdolrezapour, P., & Ketabi, S. (2012). Task difficulty and self-repair behavior in second language oral production. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22, 310-330.

Ahmadian, M.J., & Tavakoli, M. (2011). The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, fluency, and complexity of EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35-59.

Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M. (2014). Investigating what second language learners do and monitor under careful online planning conditions. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70, 50-75.

Ahmadian, M.J., Tavakoli, M., & Vahid Dastjerdi, H. (2015). The combined effects of online planning and task structure on complexity, accuracy, and fluency of L2 speech. The Language Learning Journal, 43, 41-56.

Allan, D. (1992). Oxford placement test. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Baleghizadeh, S., & Nasrollahi Shahri, M. (2013). The effect of online planning, strategic planning, and rehearsal across two proficiency levels. The Language Learning Journal, 10, 1-14.

Bygate, M. (2001). Effects of task repetition on the structure and control of oral language. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 23-49). London: Longman.

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2005). Planning and task-based performance in a second language. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task-Based performance (pp. 3-34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ellis, R. (2009). The differential effects of three types of task planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474-509.

Ericsson, K.A., & Simon, H.A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215-251.

Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (2013). Anticipating a post-task activity: The effects on accuracy, complexity, and fluency of second language performance. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 69, 249-273.

Gilabert, R. (2007). The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along planning time and [+/- Here-and-Now]: Effects on L2 oral production. In M. García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 136-156). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Godfroid, A., Housen, A., & Boers, F. (2010). A procedure for testing the noticing hypothesis in the context of vocabulary acquisition. In M. Putz, & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition (pp. 169-197). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Godfroid, A., & Uggen, M. S. (2013). Attention to irregular verbs by beginning learners of German: an eye-movement study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 291-322.

Kormos, J. (1998). Self-repairs in the speech of Hungarian learners of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eotvos University, Budapest, Hungary.

Kormos, J. (1999). The effect of speaker variables on the self-correction behavior of L2 learners. System, 27, 207-221.

Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Nakakubo, T. (2011). The effects of planning in second language performance in Japanese: processes and production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa University, Iowa, Japan.

Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 109-148.

Ortega, L. (2005). What do learners plan? Learner-driven attention to form during pre-task planning. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task performance in a second language (pp. 77- 109). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97-132.

Robinson, P. (2003). Attention and memory during SLA. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 631-678). Oxford: Blackwell.

Robinson, P. (2011). Task-based language learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61, 1-36.

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

 Seifoori, Z., & Vahidi, Z. (2012). The impact of fluency strategy training on Iranian EFL learners’ speech under online planning conditions. Language Awareness, 21, 101-112.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Skehan, P. (2001). Tasks and language performance assessment. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 167-185). Harlow: Longman.

Skehan, P. (2016). Tasks versus conditions: Two perspectives on task research and their implications for pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 34-49.

Wendel, J. (1997). Planning and second language narrative production. Doctoral dissertation, Temple University, USA.

Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (2003). The effects of pre-task planning and online planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production. Applied Linguistics, 24, 1-27.