Investigating the Effectiveness of Jigsaw 2 Model and Traditional Learning on Reading Comprehension of Iranian Learners

Subject Areas : Research in English Language Pedagogy

Ramin  Nozohouri ¹ (University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran)
Firooz  Mahmoudi ² (Department of Education, Tabriz University, Tabriz, Iran)
Naser  Adhami ³ (Islamic Azad University of Maragheh, Azarbayjan, Iran)
Somayyeh  Rasouli ⁴ (Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran)

Received: 2016-01-29 Accepted : 2016-03-02 Published : 2016-03-02

Keywords:

References:

Alhaidari, M.S. (2006). The effectiveness of using cooperative learning to promote reading comprehension, vocabulary, and fluency achievement scores of male fourth- and fifth- grade students in a Saudi Arabian school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University.
Alharbi, L.A. (2008). The effectiveness of using cooperative learning method on ESL reading comprehension performance, students' attitudes toward CL, and students' motivation  toward reading of secondary stage in Saudi public girls' schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University.  
Aronson, E., Patnoe, S. (2011). Cooperation in the Classroom: The Jigsaw Method (3rd ed.). London: Pinter & Martin, Ltd.
Badawi, G.H. (2008). The effect of jigsaw II versus whole class instruction on EFL students’  reading  motivation  and achievement. Unpublished Master of Arts Thesis, America University of Beirut.
Crandall, J.J. (1999). Cooperative learning and affective factors. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in  language learning Cambridg Cambridge University Press. 226-245
Gillies, R.M. (2013). Structuring co-operative learning experiences in primary school. Available from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37 627395
Jalilifar, A. (2009). The effect of cooperative learning  techniques  on  college  students’ reading  comprehension. System, 38(1), 96-108.
Kassim, S. (2006). An Initial Study of the Effects of Cooperative Learning on Reading Comprehension, Vocabulary, Acquisition and Motivation to Read. Reading Psychology, 27 (5) 377-403.
Khan, S. (2008). An experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of cooperative learning versus traditional learning method. Ph.D thesis, International Islamic University, Islamabad.
Larsen-Freeman, D., Anderson M. (2013). Techniques and principles in language teaching (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rahvard, Z.J. (2010). Cooperative learning strategies and reading comprehension. California Linguistic Notes, 15- 21.

Richards, J.C., Schmid, R.W. (2013). Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Routledge.
Richards, J.C., Rodgers, T.S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). in chapter 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  
Nunan, D. (2004). Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sax, G. (1980). Principles of educational and psychological measurement (2nd ed.). San   Francisco: Wadsworth.  
Shaaban, K., Ghaith, Gh. (2005). The theoretical relevance and efficacy of using cooperative  learning in the ESL/EFL classroom. TESL Reporter, 38, 14-28.
Slavin, R. E. (1994). Synthesis of research on cooperative learning. Educational Leadership, 48 .71-82.