Freedom and Human Rights from the perspective of Seyyed Ahmed Fardid Seyed Hossein Nasr
Subject Areas : Iranian Political Research
MohammaJjavad
Sadipour
1
(PhD student, Department of Political Science, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.)
Ali
Darabi
2
(Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Ali
Mortazavian
3
(Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Keywords: Seyed Ahmad Fardid, Human Rights, Anthropology, freedom, Seyed Hossein Nasr,
Abstract :
Fardid, having invented and expanded the concept of westernization and split it into two types of non-double and double that are subject to the old and new, has had a great impact on the intellectual society of Iran. Freddie sees the Renaissance as the beginning of double-harboring, because the domination of the subject matter or the originality of subjectivism is the result of evolutionism. Nazrine challenges the discourse of traditionalism or wisdom, the self-centered humanist subject that underlies modernity. The Nazarene is a modernist state with a Renaissance and a religious reformation centered on humanism against the Sunnah. In fact, two different philosophical views of humanism, with the definitions of human beings, are the heart of the anthropological way of thinking. These two, with their particular intellectual and philosophical system, seek the critique of Western modernity, and through this the central axis of modernity, which is humanism or self-founded subject, The focus on the views of these two philosophers on the face of modernity in terms of philosophical anthropology and the analogy of texts such as freedom and human rights as two modern concepts; against mystical definitions such as freedom of the heart and humanity with the sole of human freedom and responsibility In the face of God, instead of human rights It will.
_||_
