Fardid, having invented and expanded the concept of westernization and split it into two types of non-double and double that are subject to the old and new, has had a great impact on the intellectual society of Iran. Freddie sees the Renaissance as the beginning of doub More
Fardid, having invented and expanded the concept of westernization and split it into two types of non-double and double that are subject to the old and new, has had a great impact on the intellectual society of Iran. Freddie sees the Renaissance as the beginning of double-harboring, because the domination of the subject matter or the originality of subjectivism is the result of evolutionism. Nazrine challenges the discourse of traditionalism or wisdom, the self-centered humanist subject that underlies modernity. The Nazarene is a modernist state with a Renaissance and a religious reformation centered on humanism against the Sunnah. In fact, two different philosophical views of humanism, with the definitions of human beings, are the heart of the anthropological way of thinking. These two, with their particular intellectual and philosophical system, seek the critique of Western modernity, and through this the central axis of modernity, which is humanism or self-founded subject, The focus on the views of these two philosophers on the face of modernity in terms of philosophical anthropology and the analogy of texts such as freedom and human rights as two modern concepts; against mystical definitions such as freedom of the heart and humanity with the sole of human freedom and responsibility In the face of God, instead of human rights It will.
Manuscript profile
The purpose of this study was to compare citizenship rights from the perspective of Allameh Hassanzadeh Amoli and Seyed Hossein Nasr in a comparative-descriptive method. This comparative study is based on a Bradi model that has stages of description, interpretation, pro More
The purpose of this study was to compare citizenship rights from the perspective of Allameh Hassanzadeh Amoli and Seyed Hossein Nasr in a comparative-descriptive method. This comparative study is based on a Bradi model that has stages of description, interpretation, proximity and comparison. The criterion for the inclusion of the components was the study of topics and topics that had directly and indirectly mentioned citizenship rights in their books. The validity of the collected documents was done through internal and external critique. The findings showed that from the perspective of Allameh Hassanzadeh Amoli including empathy with God's creation in the Islamic government, commitment to rights and duties, justice, lawful sustenance, education, attention to physical and mental health, social health and from the perspective of Seyyed Hossein Nasr: Citizenship rights include nature, economic rights, citizens' rights in the Islamic government, women's rights in the Islamic society, freedom, human dignity and the government's right to the people.
Manuscript profile
The contrast between tradition and modernity has always been criticized throughout the history of political thought, and many thinkers have presented their views in this field in the Western and Islamic worlds. Meanwhile, the concept of modernity in the thought of Dariu More
The contrast between tradition and modernity has always been criticized throughout the history of political thought, and many thinkers have presented their views in this field in the Western and Islamic worlds. Meanwhile, the concept of modernity in the thought of Dariush Shayegan as a free thinker and Seyed Hossein Nasr as a traditional thinker and theorist is examined in this research. The theoretical framework of the research is a combination of Carl Gustav Jung's collective psychoanalysis and other hermeneutics theories. This research aims to answer the question, what is the approach of Dariush Shayegan and Seyed Hossein Nasr in facing modernity? The findings of the research also indicate that Dariush Shayegan as an Iranian thinker and intellectual underwent important changes during his intellectual life, and for this reason, his early views have very significant differences with his later opinions. On the other hand, Seyed Hossein Nasr, like Shayegan, is an ardent critic and opponent of modernity, and he believes that reforming religion leads to the deconstruction of religion and that there is no end except secularism and anti-religion. But his full-length defense of religious pluralism makes it difficult to make a final judgment about his thoughts. The method of descriptive analytical research and the method of collecting data is documentary.
Manuscript profile
Sanad
Sanad is a platform for managing Azad University publications
