The Potential for Ecotourism Sarigol National Park and Preserve Using GIS

Subject Areas : landuse

Atefeh  kalate ¹ (Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran. *(Corresponding Author))
Zahra  ghelichipour ² (‌Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran)
Elahe  Akbari ³ (‌Assistant Professor, Department of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information System, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University)
Azam  Elhami Rad ⁴ (Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran)

Received: 2016-02-08 Accepted : 2016-05-18 Published : 2021-06-22

Keywords: AHP, Ecotourism, Potential, GIS, Sarigol,

Abstract :

Background and Objectives: Tourism development in protected areas creates many benefits for area management as well as the visitors. However, it should be considered that tourism without appropriate planning and management and assessment of the area’s potential can result in negative impacts on the protected area and tourists’ experiences. The aim of this study was to identify suitable areas with potential for the development of ecotourism in protected areas. Sarigol National Park and protected area as one of the protected area in IRAN, involve considerable tourism attractions, so it should be carefully planned for ecotourism development.Method: Since the objective of this research is to identify and zoning suitable areas for ecotourism, analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and GIS technology have been used to determine suitable areas for tourism. The factors used include topography, climate, wildlife habitat, and soil and vegetation type and vegetation density. The ecological map of the region was produced by AHP and the Fuzzy-AHP method by considering these factors. Also, the attraction map area was obtained by GPS points gathering and weighting through a questionnaire and GIS software. Then, by comparing this map and ecological potential map, the appropriate areas have been zoned for ecotourism.  Results: The results show that the areas with very high potential are located in the parts including Northwest, Northeast and Southwest. Areas with high power also include areas such as Easy Waterfall, Esfarayen Dam, Ganjdan Valley and Bidvaz Valley. In the attraction map, the most attractiveness is related to the Northern parts and some Southern parts of the region, such as Easy Waterfall. Comparing the ecological potential map and the attractiveness map, it was found that most of the areas that have high attractiveness also have high potential for ecotourism development. Therefore, it illustrated that there is ability to develop ecotourism in the Northern region of the National Park, Easy waterfall and some areas of national park. These areas also have high ecological power and are attractive for ecotourism development.Discussion and Conclusion: The development of tourism in Sarigol Protected Area is in the interest of the region and the environment and promotes the level of protection and sustainable use of talents. But in protected areas, protection should be the first priority of management, and other permitted uses, including tourism, can only be done if they do not conflict with conservation objectives. 

References:

1. Lauros, P. (1999). Encyclopedia of Science, Gotenborgen Press33, 209p.


2. WTO, (1983). Study on tourisms contribution to protecting the environment. World Tourism Organization. Madrid, Spain, 41.


3. Yaghmaian, M., Bita, Tourism in Iran, Tehran, Iran Cultural Heritage, Tourism and Handicrafts Research Center Publications (in Persian).


4. M., (2008), Guide to Sustainable Tourism Planning and Management in Protected Areas, Tehran, Environmental Protection Agency Publications. (In Persian)


5. Z., Mikaeli Tabrizi. A., Mohammadzadeh M., and Abdi. A., (2011), Evaluation of Golestan National Park Ecotourism Capacity Using Multi-Criteria Evaluation Method and GIS, Journal of Renewable Natural Resources Research, Volume 6, Number 4, pp. 27-37. (In Persian)


6. Alaeddinoglu, F., Selcuk Can, A. (2011). Identification and classification of nature-based tourism resources: western Lake Van basin, Turkey. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 19, pp 198-207.


7. Ahmadi Thani. N., Babaei Kafaki. S. and Mataji, A., (2011), Investigating the Possibility of Ecological Tourism Activities in Ecological of North Zagros Forests Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making, GIS and Remote Sensing, Land Management, Volume 3, Number 4, pp. 45-64. (In Persian)


8. H., Golestani. H., Bijani. M. and Ahdoukhsh. R., (2003). Sarigol National Park and Protected Area, Mashhad, Publications of the General Department of Environmental Protection of Khorasan Province. (In Persian)


9. A. and Firoozehaei, M., (2013), Analysis of Environmental Impacts of Tehran Sample Slaughterhouse by Integrated Alignment Checklist and Hierarchical Analysis Process, Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, Volume 66, Number 1, pp. 23-36. (In Persian)


10. M.J., (2014). Multi-criteria decisions, Tehran, Tehran University Press. (In Persian)


11. Taylor, B.W. (2004). Introduction to Management Science. Pearson Education Inc, New Jersey.


12. Bevilacqua, M., Amore, A., Polonara, F. (2004). A Multi-Criteria Decision approach to Choosing the Optimal Blanching– Freezing System. Journal of Food Engineering 63, 253-263.


13. Salman Mahini. A. R., Riazi B., Naimi. B., Babaei Kafaki. S. and Javadi Larijani. A., (2009), Evaluation of ecotourism potential of Behshahr city based on multi-criteria evaluation method using GIS, Environmental Science and Technology, Volume 11, Number 1, pp. 187-198. (In Persian)


14. Saaty, T, L. (1996). The Analytic Network Process. Pittsburgh: RWS Publications.


15. Taha, A. (2003). Operations Research. Pearson Education Inc. Fayetteville.


16. Kunz, J. (2010). The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Eagle City Hall Location Options Task Force, 1-25.


17. Moreno, J., Jimenez, M. (2005). A spreadsheet module for consistent consensus building in AHP-group decision making, Group Decision and Negotiation 14, 89–108.


18. Kordi, M. (2008). Comparison of fuzzy and crisp analytic hierarchy process (AHP) methods for spatial multi criteria decision analysis in GIS. University of Gavle Department of Technology and Built Environment, 9p.


19. Bertolini, M., Braglia M. (2006). Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract, International Journal of Project Management 24, 422-430.


20. Arrowsmith, C. (2002). Modelling Potential for Nature-based Tourism. Nature-based Tourism, Environment and Land Management, 167-179.