Determining and prioritizing the selection criteria of urban plant species
Subject Areas : Urban Environment
Zohreh Akhgari Sangatash
1
(PhD student in environment, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources)
Seyedhamed Mirkarimi
2
(Associate Professor of Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. *(Corresponding Author))
Marjan Mohammadzadeh
3
(Associate Professor of Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. )
Fatemeh Hashemi
4
(Assistant Professor at Department of Agroecology - Agricultural Systems and Sustainability at Aarhus University)
Keywords: Criterion prioritization, Plant species, Ecosystem services, Urban environment, Green space.,
Abstract :
Background and Objective: Nowadays, paying attention to environmental quality in urban design has played a significant role in improving individuals' quality of life. Urban green space, as productive land uses, provide significant benefits to citizens through social, ecological, aesthetic, and economic services, and have a remarkable impact on the livability of the city. Therefore, this research, with the aim of identifying and prioritizing the selection criteria of plant species in the indices of ecosystem, economic, ecological and aesthetic service indicators, has an important role in selecting the correct plant species. Material and Methodology: In this research, 96 criteria were extracted from the review of scientific sources and the opinions of experts in the four axes of the index of ecosystem services, economic, ecological and visual aesthetics. Then, by using the Delphi method in three cycles of receiving information from the questionnaire, the opinions of 14 experts of environmental science, art, green space and urban planning and botanists were asked. Finally, 76 of the 96 criteria introduced for the selection of species were prioritized and selected, and 20 criteria were removed from the cycle. Findings: The results showed that in the ecosystem services index, aesthetic value, tourism, and air purification criteria were important, while in the economic index, seedlings, irrigation equipment, and equipment depreciation and obsolescence criteria were important. In the ecological index, the criteria for water needs, the number of frosty days per year, and the average number of sunny days per year were important. In the beauty-cognitive visual index of green space, diversity of color and texture diversity and visual sharing criteria were considered important for aesthetic prioritization. Discussion and Conclusion: By considering these criteria, it results in the selection of plant species that are suitable for certain ecological and economic conditions, and also take into consideration their appearance and their ability to provide ecosystem services. Therefore, City planners and managers can use the prioritization of the plants introduced in this research to choose appropriate species for the urban environment.
1. Johnson, J., Jones, S., Wood, S., Chaplin‐Kramer, R., Hawthorne, P.L., Mulligan, M., Pennington, D., DeClerck, F. “Mapping Ecosystem Services to Human Well‐being: A toolkit to support integrated landscape management for the SDGs”. Journal of Ecological Applications. vol. 29. pp, 45-80. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1985.
2. United Nations. 2018.
3. Lourdes, T., Hamel, P., Gibbins, C., Sanusi, R., Azhar, B., Lechner, A. Planning for green infrastructure using multiple urban ecosystem service models and multicriteria analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning. vol. 226. pp. 1-12. 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104500.
4. MEA [Millennium Ecosystem Assessment]. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. 2005.
5. Rabiei Sadeghabadi, M., Noori, O., Deihimfard, R. 2020. Plant selection for semi-arid urban landscapes with an emphasis on climate change (case study: Tehran). Jornal of Environmental Sciences. vol. 18. pp. 219-236. 2020, Doi: 10.29252/envs.18.1.219. (In Persian)
6. Kalfas, D., Zagkas, D., Dragozi, E. Estimating value of the ecosystem services in the urban and peri-urban green of a town Florina-Greece, using the CVM. Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. vol. 27. pp. 1- 12. 2020, doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1714786.
7. Vieira, J., Matos, P., Mexia, T. Green spaces are not all the same for the provision of air purification and climate regulation services: The case of urban parks. Journal of Environmental Research. vol. 160. pp. 306-313. 2018, doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.006.
8. Ramyar, R., Saeedi, S., Bryant, M., Davatgar, A., Mortaz Hedjri, G. Ecosystem services mapping for green infrastructure planning–The case of Tehran. Journal of Science of the Total Environment. vol. 703. pp. 1-39. 2020, doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135466.
9. Akhgari Sangatash, Z., Mirkarimi, H., Mohammadzadeh, M., Salmanmahini, A. Urban landscape visual quality assessment (Study Areas: Mashhad and Gorgan). A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of M.Sc. in Environmental Sciences. 2017, pp. 50-53. (In Persian)
10. Jalilian, S., Nainava, P., Jalilian, S. Introducing suitable plant species for rill erosion control. Soil and water modeling and management. vol. 1. pp. 160-174. 2021, doi: 10.22098/mmws.2021.9231.1028. (In Persian)
11. Kaplan, S. Kaplan, R. 1982. Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. New York: Praeger. the University of Michigan. Pp: 287
12. Junwei, H. The Visual Quantitative Analysis and Empirical Research of Commercial Pedestrian Streetscape. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, vol, 50. pp. 76-83. 1998. 1998.
13. Nasar, J. Urban Design Aesthetics: The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exterior. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Design Review (Routledge Revivals). pp. 67-78. Routledge. 2017, doi:10.4324/9781315531137-7.
14. Amini Parsa, V., Salehi, E., Yavari, A., & Bodegom, P. An improved method for assessing mismatches between supply and demand in urban regulating ecosystem services: A case study in Tabriz, Iran. Journal of PLOS ONE. vol. 14. pp. 1- 22. 2019, doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220750
15. Makhdum, M. 2013. Fundamental of Landuse Planning. 1-289. (In Persian)
16. Saidi, S., Mohammadzadeh, M., Salman Mahini, A., Mirkarimi, H. Evaluation and modeling of the scenic value of the landscape using the method of weighted linear combination of a case study: Ziarat watershed hiking trails in Golestan province. Journal of Natural Environment. vol. 67. pp. 301-311. 2013, doi: 10.22059/jne.2014.52729 (In Persian)
17. Azmoodeh, M., Heidari, S., Zamani, Z. CBA Evaluation of Green Walls Implementation in Tehran City. Environmental Science and Technology. vol. 21. pp. 237-247. 2019, doi: 10.22034/jest.2019.14556 (In Persian)
18. Zoratipour, A., Almasieh, k. Selection of urban green space plant species, based on landscape design and appropriate to climate and soil. 5th National Conference on Biodiversity and its Impact on Agriculture and Environment, Urmia, 2019, https:// civilica.com/doc/1226932. (In Persian)
19. Amirian, H., Payamenoor, V., Akbarloo., M. Introduction of the most Salt Tolerant Plants and their Reproduction Methods in the Turkmensahra Region. Man and environment. vol. 19. pp. 91-104. 2021, doi: 20.1001.1.15625532.1400.19.2.8.2.
20. Amirian, S, Mohammadzadeh, M, Mirkarimi, SH, Saeidi, S. Identification of economic and cultural criteria affecting aesthetic values using Delphi method and popular questionnaire in Gorgan city. Renewable natural resources research. vol. 13. pp. 153-164. 2022, doi: 10.30495/jrnr.2023.70702.10275. (In Persian)
21. Donahoe, H. A Delphi consensus. Current Issues in Tourism. Journal of Defining culturally sensitive ecotourism. vol. 1. pp: 27-45. 2011, doi:10.1080/13683500903440689.
22. Danladi musa, H. Rusli Yacob, M. and Makmom Abdullah, A. Delphi method of developing environmental well-being indicators for the evaluation of urban sustainability in Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Sciences, Vol, 30. pp: 244- 249. 2015, doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.10.044.
23. Haddadinia, Somayeh, Danekar, Afshin. Prioritizing nature tourism criteria in desert and semi-desert ecosystems with Delphi method. Geography and regional urban planning. vol. 2. pp. 17-30. 2013, doi: 10.22111/gaij.2012.696. (In Persian)
24. Mafi- Gholami, D. Modeling of multiple environmental hazards in protected areas (Case study: Kouh-e-Khamin Protected Area of Kohgiluyeh and Boyer Ahmad Province). Journal of Natural Environment. vol. 75. 2023, doi: 10.22059/jne.2023.365968.2604 (In Persian)
