Iranian EFL Instructors' Perspectives on Pragmatics Instruction: Explor-ing Gender and Teaching Experience Differences

Subject Areas :

Marzieh Rahaei ¹ , Hossein Vahid Dastjerdi ² , Reza Talebinejad ³ , omid tabatabaei ⁴ , Hadi Salehi ⁵

1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -

Received: 2024-05-10 Accepted : 2024-07-18 Published : 2025-12-11

Keywords: Gender, Instructors' Perspectives, Pragmatics Instruction, Teaching Experience,

Abstract :

This research paper examines the perspectives of Iranian male and female EFL instructors to-wards pragmatics instruction, with a focus on exploring the differences based on gender and teaching experience. Drawing from a comprehensive thesis, the paper investigates the instruc-tors' views on the strengths and weaknesses of current resources for pragmatics instruction, the challenges they face in teaching pragmatics, and their suggestions for enhancing pragmatics ed-ucation. Moreover, the study explores how Iranian male and female EFL instructors' perceptions of explicit instruction in promoting learners' pragmatic competence vary based on their gender and teaching experience. To achieve all these aims, the study employed an exploratory sequen-tial design, including pre-test and post-test measures, interviews, and survey questionnaires to collect and analyze both qualitative and quantitative data. The participants were 100 Iranian English language instructors who taught at the university level. They were selected through con-venient sampling and divided into two groups: the treatment and control groups. The treatment group received a training program on pragmatics instruction, while the control group did not re-ceive any specific training. The findings suggest that while both male and female instructors recognize the importance of pragmatics instruction, they face distinct challenges and have dif-fering perspectives on the effectiveness of explicit teaching approaches. The study also high-lights the need for tailored professional development opportunities to address the specific con-cerns and requirements of EFL instructors with varying levels of teaching experience. These findings offer valuable implications for second language teaching and learning in the Iranian context.

References:

Alcon-Soler, E. (2015). Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruc-tion and length of stay. System, 48, 62-74.
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Vellenga, H. E. (2012). The effect of instruction on conventional expressions in L2 prag-matics. System, 40(1), 77-89.
Belz, J. A. (2007). The role of computer mediation in the instruction and de-velopment of L2 pragmatic compe-tence. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 45-75.
Bialystok, E. (1993). Symbolic representa-tion and attentional control in prag-matic competence. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds.), Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 43-57). Oxford Uni-versity Press.
Cohen, A. D. (2008). Teaching and as-sessing L2 pragmatics: What can we expect from learners? Language Teaching, 41(2), 213-235.
Farahian, M., Rezaee, M., & Gholami, A. (2012). Does direct instruction devel-op pragmatic competence? Teaching refusals to EFL learners of English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 814-821.
Halenko, N., & Jones, C. (2011). Teaching pragmatic awareness of spoken re-quests to Chinese EAP learners in the UK: Is explicit instruction effective? System, 39(2), 240-250.
Ifantidou, E. (2013). Pragmatic competence and explicit instruction. Journal of Pragmatics, 59, 93-116.
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. R. (2001). Pragmat-ic development in a second language. Language Learning, 51(1), 1-52.
Kim, H. Y., & Taguchi, N. (2015). Promot-ing task-based pragmatics instruction in EFL classroom contexts: The role of task complexity. The Modern Lan-guage Journal, 99(4), 656-677.
Koike, D. A., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic compe-tence. System, 33(3), 481-501.
LoCastro, V. (1997). Pedagogical interven-tion and pragmatic competence de-velopment. Applied Language Learn-ing, 8(1), 75-109.
LoCastro, V. (2012). Pragmatics for lan-guage educators: A sociolinguistic perspective. Routledge.
Narita, R. (2012). The effects of pragmatic instruction on the development of pragmatic awareness and the use of hearsay evidential markers by Japa-nese ESL learners. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Lan-guage, 16(1), 1-20.
O'Keeffe, A., Clancy, B., & Adolphs, S. (2011). Introducing pragmatics in use. Routledge.
Rose, K. R. (2005). On the effects of in-struction in second language pragmat-ics. System, 33(3), 385-399.
Taguchi, N. (2007). Development of speed and accuracy in pragmatic compre-hension in English as a foreign lan-guage. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 313-338.