Effect of Textual Coherence Features on Elementary Students’ Recall of Stories in PersianTextbooks Based on Halliday and Hassan's Theory
Subject Areas :
Iman Jokar
1
,
Bahman Gorjian
2
,
Elkhas Veysi
3
1 -
2 -
3 -
Keywords: coherence, recall, systemic functional linguistics, text,
Abstract :
This research investigates the impact of textual coherence factors on the improvement of reading comprehension in elementary school students. It aims to analyze the influence of grammatical, lexical, and connective elements on students' ability to recall stories, utilizing the framework of systemic functional linguistics (SFL). Textual coherence, as one of the key components in understanding and conveying meaning in educational texts, plays an important role in improving reading comprehension. This study uses a qualitative method and analyzes 64 stories from elementary school Persian textbooks to identify and analyze textual applications and their effects on students' recall of the stories. Data were collected through questionnaires based on Halliday and Matthiessen's (2014) SFL. A researcher-made questionnaire was designed, and 150 students were recruited to answer the items on a 5-point Likert scale. Results showed that grammatical, lexical, and connective coherence effectively improve students’ text recall. In comparison, the lexical features are more effective than connective and grammatical features, facilitating students’ recall of the stories in Persian textbooks. This study reveals that teachers at the elementary level need to focus on textual coherence, especially grammatical and connective, and then lexical features. Implications suggest that textbook designers focus on textual structures in designing educational textbooks since they affect students’ recall and improve their reading comprehension.
Aghagolzadeh, F. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and textual context. Humanities and Cultural Studies Research Institute Publications.
Aghagolzadeh, F. (2013). Critical discourse analysis, development of discourse analysis in linguistics (First Edition). Scientific and Cultural Publications.
Alpcaci, M. (2016). The use of cohesion elements in playwriting: Based on Halliday and Hasan's cohesion theory and Thornbury's 2005 framework. Theatre and Performance Studies Journal, 18(3), 225-240.
Assadi, N., Noushin, K., & Azami J. (2024).The effect of textual cohesive reference instruction on the reading comprehension of Iranian EFL students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(5):1-18. DOI: 10.5539/ijel.v2n5p18
Foruzandeh, M., & Bani Taleb, F. (2014). A comparative study of coherence in religious texts. Journal of Religious and Literary Studies,14(3), 89-110.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Introduction to functional grammar (Fourth Edition). Routledge.
Kailani, A. (2017). Systemic functional linguistics analysis of cohesion and coherence in written nursing care reports. International Journal of Educational Best Practices (IJEBP), 1(2), 1-23.
Karadeniz, A. (2017). Cohesion and coherence in written texts of students of faculty based on Halliday and Hasan's cohesion theory. Journal of Educational Sciences, 45(2), 105-120.
Lien, Chi-S. (2013). Text coherence, reading ability, and children’s scientific understanding. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 44(4),875-904.
Lotfipour Saadi, K. (1992). The role of text linguistics in discourse analysis. Islamic Azad University Press.
Malmir, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). The socio-pragmatic, lexico-grammatical, and cognitive strategies in L2 pragmatic comprehension: The case of Iranian male vs. female EFL learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 8(1), 1-23.
Mousavinia, M., & Ghalavandi, R. (2022). Analysis of Fazel Nazari's Ghazals based on Halliday and Hassan's textual coherence model. Journal of Persian Linguistics and Literature Research, 12(3), 95-120.
Ngongo, M., & Ndandara, A. (2024). Exploring the realization of cohesion as resource of text texture on understanding students’ academic writing. English Review Journal of English Education 12(1):343 – 352. DOI: 10.25134/erjee.v12i1.9241
Ozuru, Y., Best, R., Bell, C., Witherspoon, A., & McNamara, D. S. (2010). Influence of question format and text availability on the assessment of expository text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 28(4), 448-469.
Pickren, S. E., Stacy, M., Del Tufo, S. N., Spencer, M., & Cutting, L. E. (2022). The contribution of text characteristics to reading comprehension: Investigating the influence of text emotionality. Reading research quarterly, 57(2), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.431
Ramezani, M., & Rostambek Tafreshi, S. (2015). Analysis of textual coherence in contemporary literary texts. Journal of Contemporary Language and Literature, 15(4), 55-750.
Randy, R., & Briones, Y. (2016). Textual Analysis through Systemic Functional Linguistics. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics (JELTL), 1(2), 109-144. https://doi.org/ 10.21462/jeltl.v1i2.27
Shokoofgi, S., & Ahmadian, M. (2016). Analysis of the textual coherence of Persian textbooks and its impact on students' comprehension. Journal of Education, 10(4), 45-60.
Strohmaier, A. R., Ehmke, T., Härtig, H., & Leiss, D. (2023). On the role of linguistic features for comprehension and learning from STEM texts. A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 39, 100533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100533
Turgut Dost, G. (2021). Impact of a systemic functional linguistic informed course on teacher candidates’ knowledge about genre and language. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(1), 281-300. Doi: 10.52462/jlls.17
Veysi, A., & Molavi Vardanjani, A. (2016). Studying textual coherence in different texts based on Halliday and Hassan's theory. Journal of Linguistics and Text Analysis, 18(2), 101-120.
Veysi, A., & Oraki, M. (2016). Comparing the elements of textual coherence of Surah An-Nas and its translation based on the theory of Halliday and Hassan. Persian Language and Literature Journal, 20(1), 67-85.