Effect of organic and chemical fertilizers on quantitative and qualitative oil and Grain yield in Camelina sativa L. as a medicinal plant

Subject Areas :

firouzeh  Khalatbari Mokaram ¹ (Department of Medicinal Plants Modification and Physiology, Jahad University of Kermanshah, Kermanshah-Iran)
hamidreza  Chaghazardi ² (Department of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University of Kermanshah. Kermanshah - Iran.)
danial  Kahrizi ³ (Department of Agriculture and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University of Kermanshah. Kermanshah - Iran.)
hossain  Rostami Ahmadvandi ⁴ (Plant Breeding Group, BistonShafa Knowledge-Based Company.)

Received: 2020-11-14 Accepted : 2020-11-14 Published : 2018-10-23

Keywords: Fatty Acids, Chemical Fertilizer, Organic Fertilizer, Camelina Sativa,

Abstract :

The use of organic fertilizers is very important in sustainable agriculture. Accordingly, this experiment was conducted to evaluate the Camelina sativa (DH1025 line) plant response to chemical and organic (sheep and cattle manure) fertilizers. And their impact on quantitative and qualitative yields. The experiment was carried out based on a complete randomized design with 5 replications in fall 2016 in the village of Zalkah, Mahedasht, Kermanshah Province, Iran. The experiment was carried out in 4 treatments including: control (without fertilizer), full fertilizer (150 kg ha-1), sheep and cow manure (both 50 tons per hectare). In this research, quantitative and qualitative yields and biochemical traits were evaluated. The results of data analysis showed that the use of cow manure had a significant effect on grain yield. There was a significant difference between fertilizer treatments on fatty acids. The cow manure indicated the highest effect palmitic acid, oleic, linoleic and arachidic acid which was 1.8%, 8%, 0.81%,6/6% respectively. The cow manure fertilizer showed the lowest effect on stearic  acid( 4.57% lower than the control). Also, cow manure treatment reduced the amount of Erusic acid to 12.93% lower than the control, which is a significant nutritional result.