پیش بینی کننده های درگیری شناختی زبان آموزان ایرانی بر اساس اهداف پیشرفت
Subject Areas : All areas of language and translation
Saeed Ahmadi
1
,
Mohammadreza Nasr
2
1 - English Department, Bushehr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bushehr, Iran
2 - English Department, National Iranian Oil Company, Iran
Keywords: اهداف پیشرفت, زبان آموزان, عملکرد گرایی, درگیری شناختی, تبحر گرایی,
Abstract :
هدف از انجام این پژوهش کمی, بررسی رابطه ی بین درگیری شناختی و اهداف پیشرفت زبان آموزان ایرانی می باشد. این تحقیق همچنین مشخص می کند که کدام یک از انواع اهداف پیشرفت ( تبحر گرایی, عملکرد گرایی, تبحر گریزی و عملکرد گریزی) می تواند درگیری شناختی را به طور معناداری پیش بینی کند. بدین منظور, 183 زبان آموز ایرانی دو پرسشنامه اعتبارسنجی شده مربوط به اهداف پیشرفت ( ایلیوت و مورایاما، 2008) و درگیری شناختی ( گونوک و کازو، 2015) شامل 22 سنجه با مقیاس لیکرت را تکمیل نمودند. یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهد که بین درگیری شناختی و اهداف پیشرفت, همبستگی مثبت وجود دارد. نتایج پژوهش همچنین حاکی از آن است که درگیری شناختی دارای همبستگی مثبت و معنا داری با اهداف پیشرفت تبحر گرایی و عملکرد گرایی می باشد. علاوه بر این, نتایج تحلیل رگرسیون خطی چندگانه بیانگر آن است که اهداف پیشرفت تبحر گرایی و عملکرد گرایی به ترتیب, اولین و دومین اهدافی هستند که بیشترین نقش را در پیش بینی درگیری شناختی دارند. نتایج این پژوهش دارای کاربردهای بسیار مهمی برای مدرسان زبان انگلیسی, مربیان و طراحان برنامه های درسی می باشد.با توجه به نتایج این پژوهش, زبانشناسان کاربردی و روانشناسان آموزشی می توانند شیو ه های جدیدی را جهت درگیری شناختی زبان آموزان ابداع نمایند تا زبان آموزان بتوانند از طریق آنها به اهداف یادگیری خود دست یابند
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427-445.
Brophy, J. E. (2017). Fostering student learning and motivation in the elementary school classroom, Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 283-306): Routledge.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford publications.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (multivariate applications series). New York: Taylor & Francis Group, 396, 7384.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 18-74.
Dweck, C., & Elliot, A. (1983). Achievement motivation. In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Socialization, personality and social development: New York: Wiley.
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189.
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218.
Elliot, A. J., & Murayama, K. (2008). On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 613.
Erdem D.K, Ibrahim K. (2013). Motivational and learning strategies as predictors of high school students' math achievement. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 42 (1), 96-109.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763–782). New York, NY: Springer.
Glanville, J. L., & Wildhagen, T. (2007). The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(6), 1019-1041.
Greene, B., & Miller, R. (1996). Influences on course performance: Goals, perceived ability, and self-regulation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2), 181-192.
Greene, B. A. (2015). Measuring cognitive engagement with self-report scales: Reflections from over 20 years of research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14-30.
Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students' cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(4), 462-482.
Gunuc, S., & Kuzu, A. (2015). Student engagement scale: development, reliability, and validity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(4), 587-610.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (3), 638-645
Helme, S., & Clarke, D. (2001). Identifying cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13(2), 133-153.
Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 422.
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 7-27.
Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 141-184.
Kaplan, A., Middleton, M. J., Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2002). Achievement goals and goal structures. Goals, goal structures, and patterns of adaptive learning (pp.21-53). Mahwah, NJ; Erlbaum.
Lam, A. C. (2015). Student perceptions of classroom goal structure: Methodological considerations and person-context interaction ( Doctoral dissertation), UC Irvine.
Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). Interplay between personal goals and classroom goal structures in predicting student outcomes: A multilevel analysis of person-context interactions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 15.
Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The dilemma of performance-Approach Goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students' motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 197.
Maehr, M. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1980). Culture and achievement motivation: A second look. Studies in Cross-Cultural Psychology, 2, 221-267.
Maehr, M. L., & Zusho, A. (2009). Achievement goal theory: The past, present, and future. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 77–104). New York: Routledge.
Mahatmya, D., Lohman, B. J., Matjasko, J. L., & Farb, A. F. (2012). Engagement across developmental periods. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 45-63). Boston, MA: Springer.
Martin, A. J., & Liem, G. A. D. (2010). Academic personal bests (PBs), engagement, and achievement: A cross-lagged panel analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 265-270.
Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students' goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 514.
Metallidou, P., & Vlachou, A. (2007). Motivational beliefs, cognitive engagement, and achievement in language and mathematics in elementary school children. International Journal of Psychology, 42(1), 2-15.
Midgley, C., Kaplan, A., & Middleton, M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 77.
Miller, R. B., Greene, B. A., Montalvo, G. P., Ravindran, B., & Nichols, J. D. (1996). Engagement in academic work: The role of learning goals, future consequences, pleasing others, and perceived ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(4), 388-422.
Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 432.
Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 5(4), 269-287.
Pallant, J. (2010). A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program, 4" edition: Allen & Unwin Book Publishers, Australia.
Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50-72.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544.
Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekarts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Ramshe, M. H., Ghazanfari, M., & Ghonsooly, B. (2019 a). The role of personal best goals in EFL learners' behavioural, cognitive, and emotional engagement. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 1627-1638.
Ramshe, M.H., Ghazanfari, M., & Ghonsooly, B. (2019 b). The role of social goals in Iranian undergraduate students' cognitive, emotional, and behavioral engagement. Applied Research on English Language, 8(1), 115-138.
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). Boston, MA: Springer US.
Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents' academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal, 100(5), 443-471.
Salkind, N. J. (2006). Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics. London: Sage Publications.
Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner.In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219-235): Springer.
Sedaghat, M., Abedin, A., Hejazi, E., & Hassanabadi, H. (2011). Motivation, cognitive engagement, and academic achievement. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2406-2410.
Sideridis, G. D. (2005). Goal orientation, academic achievement, and depression: evidence in favor of a revised goal theory framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 366.
Sutherland, S. (2010). Student and teacher perceptions of student engagement. (Unpublished doctorate dissertation), Toronto University.
Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.) New York Allyn and Bacon.
Urdan, T. C., & Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 213-243.
Velayutham, S., & Aldridge, J. M. (2013). Influence of psychosocial classroom environment on students’ motivation and self-regulation in science learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 507-527.
Walker, C. O., Greene, B. A., & Mansell, R. A. (2006). Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1-12.
Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students' motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236.
Yu, K., & Martin, A. J. (2014). Personal best (PB) and ‘classic achievement goals in the Chinese context: Their role in predicting academic motivation, engagement, and buoyancy. Educational Psychology, 34(5), 635-658.
