Principles and criteria affecting the physical identity shaping Iranian contemporary architecture (case study of the Second Pahlavi period)
Subject Areas : architectureHamid Majedi 1 , Seyede Sara Ebnoreza 2 , Farh Habib 3
1 - Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - PhD student, Department of Architecture, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Professor, Department of Urban Planning, Science and Research Unit, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Keywords: architectural principles, physical identity, public historic buildings, architecture of the Second Pahlavi period, social space.,
Abstract :
Architecture in the Second Pahlavi period is characterized by the triangle of the western culture and civilization influence, Iranian historical heritage with starring role of pre- and post- Islamic architecture and the emergence of architecture from the heart of this period. In this period, known as the millennium of the modern architecture in Iran, architects such as Louis Kahn and Hassan Fathy set forth the historical value and experiences in the architecture of the past and as such adopting a nostalgic view toward traditional architecture, they addressed its revitalization in terms of design and implementation. In most of the contemporary buildings of Tehran not all of them, a form imitation of Iranian traditional architecture or the contemporary western one has taken place. Numerous notable examples are certainly inappropriate patches of the environment and architectural profession. It would be considered as a variable affecting Tehran public building issues and investigated during the present study. This research reviews the physical identity of the public buildings in the Second Pahlavi period. Library method was initially adopted to investigate the factors affecting the physical identity formation during the Second Pahlavi period. Then, the architectural experts and scholars were asked to complete the questionnaire encompassing the points from the library analysis which were studied in the public buildings of the Second Pahlavi period. The statistical population comprised 150 architectural scholars. Among the findings of this research are the major developments related to the Second Pahlavi period including civil projects and formation of the residential units and complexes. Pahlavi architecture is a transition period from the traditional architecture to the modern one. The modern architecture generated through the Second Pahlavi period was broadly backed by the European architecture mainstreams including the international style of Staatliches Bahaus, Le Corbusier artworks, Frank Lloyd Wright products, etc. Its outcome was Iranian modern architecture that has been called pseudomodern architecture. Given that after the rise of modernism, the regionalism approach entails the ample challenges related to interactions and confrontations of the modern architecture of the cultural- regional identities, the main research question is that which indices and concepts have been focused during the design of some works related to the mentioned period.
الکساندر ، ک ، معماری و راز جاودانگی :راه بی زمان ساختن ، ترجمه مهرداد قیومی بید هندی ، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران ، 1381
.بنتلی .ای ین و دیگران . محیط های پاسخده. ترجمه مصطفی بهزاد فر .تهران .دانشگاه علم و صنعت . 1382
.بهزاد فر . هویت شهر .نگاهی به هویت شهر تهران .انتشارات شهر . چاپ اول تهران . 1386
.تقی زاده ، م.ادراک زیبایی و هویت شهر . اصفهان .سازمان فرهنگی تفریجی شهرداری اصفهان . 1386
جنکنز ، ر. هویت اجتماعی ، ترجمه تورج یاراحمدی ، تهران ، نشر شیرازه ، 1381
Askarizad, R., & Safari, H. (2020). The influence of social interactions on the behavioral patterns of the people in urban spaces (case study: The pedestrian zone of Rasht Municipality Square, Iran). Cities, 101, 102687.
Barresi, J. (2002). Fromthe Thought is the Thinker'tothe Voice is the Speaker' William James and the Dialogical Self. Theory & Psychology, 12(2), 237-250.
Canter, David, (1977), The Psychology of Place, the architectural press, London.
De Medici, S., De Toro, P., & Nocca, F. (2019). Cultural heritage and sustainable development: Impact assessment of two adaptive reuse projects in Siracusa, Sicily. Sustainability, 12(1), 311.
Del, M. S. T. T., & Tabrizi, S. K. (2020). A methodological assessment of the importance of physical values in architectural conservation using Shannon entropy method. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 44, 135-151.
Epstein, Seymour, (1973), “The Self-Concept Revisited”, In American Psychologist,No.28, pp.404-414.
Ferwari, M. S., Salman Wadi, R., Ferwati, O., Keyvanfar, A., & Shafaghat, A. (2020). Emerging factors shaping identity of indigenous urbanism concurrently adopting modernity in Qatar: The application of diffusion theory. ACE: architecture, city and environment, 14(42).
Giuliani, Maria Vittoria, (2003), “Theory of Attachment and Place Attachment”, In:Bonnes, Mirilia (eds),Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues, ASHGATE.
Gustafson, Per, (2001), “Meaning of Place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations”, in Journal of Environmental Psychology, No. 21,pp. 5-16.
Haugh, AshildLappegard, (2007), “Identity and Place: a critical comparison of three identity theories”, in Architectural Science Review, Vol.50, No.1, pp. 44-51.
Kaplan, S, (1995), “The Restirative benefits of nature: toward an integrativframework”, In Journal of Environmental Psychology, No. 15, pp. 169-182.
Kaplan, Stephen, (1992), “The Restorative Environment: Nature and Human Experience”. In: Relf, Diane (edt). The Role of Horticulture in Human Well-Being and Social Development, Timber Press.
Kaplan, Stephen, (1995), “THE RESTORATIVE BENEFITS OF NATURE:TOWARD AN INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK”, In Journal of Environmental Psychology, No.15,pp. 169-182.
Korpela, K.M, (1989), “Place-identity as a product of environmental self regulation”,in Journal of Environmental Psychology, No.9, pp.241-256.
Mehanna, W. A. E. H., & Mehanna, W. A. E. H. (2019). Urban renewal for traditional commercial streets at the historical centers of cities. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 58(4), 1127-1143.
Norberg- Schulz, C, (1980), Genius Loci: toward a phenomenology of architecture,Rizzoli, New York.
Polkinghorne, Donald E, (1991), “Narrative and Self Concept”, In Journal of Narrative and Life History, No. 2&3 , pp. 135-153
Proshansky, Harold M, (1978), “The City and Self Identity”, In Environment and Behavior, No.10, pp. 147-169.
Proshansky, Harold M. (1983), “Place Identity: Physical World Socialization of theSelf”,In Journal of Environmental Psychology, No.3, pp. 57-83.
Rapoport, Amos, (1982), The Meaning of the Built Environment, A Nonverbar communication Approach, SAGE.
Sarbin, Theodor R, (1983), “Place Identity as a Component of Self: An Addendum”,In Journal of Environmental Psychology, No.3, pp. 337-342.
Twigger-Ross, Clare L. &Uzzel , David L, (1996), “Place and Identity Processes”, InJournal of Environmental Psychology, No. 16, pp. 205–220.
Twigger-Ross, Clare, Bonaiuto, Marino, Breakwell, Glynis, (2003), “IdentityTheoriesand Environmental Psychology”,In: Bonnes, Mirilia (eds). Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues, ASHGATE