بررسی عوامل علی و معلول در سیستم ارزیابی عملکرد سازمانی با رویکرد پویایی شناسی
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریتیزدان کرمی مال امیری 1 , المیرا مشایخی نظام ابادی 2 * , داوود قره خانی 3
1 -
2 - مدریت صنعتی, مدیریت, ددانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قزوین, قزوین ,ایران
3 - داوود قراخانی، استادیار، گروه مدیریت اجرایی، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد قزوین
کلید واژه: ارزیابی عملکرد سازمانی, پویا شناسی سیستم , صنعت خودرو,
چکیده مقاله :
با مطالعه بر روی پژوهش ها نشان می دهد، چرخه ارزیابی عملکرد سازمانی در قالب یک سیستم پویا مدل سازی نگردیده است. لزوم بررسی فعالیت های ارزیابی عملکرد سازمانی در قالب یک سیستم پویا در صنعت مورد مطالعه بر اساس عملکرد و استفاده از روشهای نوين علمي تحليل داده از مهم ترين خلاهاي پژوهشي مي باشد. روش تحقیق اکتشافی و تحلیلی می باشد مبتنی بر نظر خبرگان می باشد. جهت پایش متغیرهای موثر در ارزیابی عملکرد سامانی از روش دلفی مبتنی بر نظر خبرگان استفاده گردید. جهت شناسایی متغیرهای علی و معلولی از روش دیماتل استفاده گردید. 3 متغیر شامل سرمایه گذاری، توسعه بازار، یادگیری سازمانی به عنوان عوامل علی در سیستم ارزیابی عملکرد می باشند و 5 متغیر شامل متغیرهای تحقیق و توسعه، بهره وری، عملکرد تولید، پروژه های بهبود، توسعه محصول جدید به عنوان عوامل معلول در سیستم ارزیابی عملکرد سازمان می باشند. سپس بر اساس رویکرد پویایی سیستم یک مدل مفهومی مبتنی بر هشت حلقه طراحی گردید.
By studying the researches, it shows that the organizational performance evaluation cycle has not been modeled in the form of a dynamic system. The need to investigate organizational performance evaluation activities in the form of a dynamic system in the studied industry based on performance and the use of new scientific data analysis methods is one of the most important research gaps. The research method is exploratory and analytical based on the opinion of experts. In order to monitor the effective variables in evaluating the performance of the system, the Delphi method based on the opinion of experts was used. Dimatel method was used to identify causal and effectual variables. 3 variables include investment, market development, organizational learning as causal factors in the performance evaluation system, and 5 variables include research and development variables, productivity, production performance, improvement projects, new product development as disabling factors in the evaluation system. are the performance of the organization. Then, based on the system dynamics approach, a conceptual model based on eight rings was designed.
1. Mehrdad Maghsoudi, Navid Nezafati,Navigating the acceptance of implementing business intelligence in organizations: A system dynamics approach,Telematics and Informatics Reports,Volume 11,2023,100070,ISSN 2772-5030.
2. Abdelaziz Ouazzani-Chahidi, Loukili Abdellatif, Jose-Fernando Jimenez, Lamia Berrah,Maturity levels of management process for improving industrial performance,Scientific African,Volume 21,2023,e01852,ISSN 2468-2276.
3. Fernando Yanine, Zócimo Campos,Sustaining Business Performance Management: An Operational Framework,Procedia Computer Science,Volume 221,2023,Pages 25-32,ISSN 1877-0509.
4. Yuan Cheng, Meng Chang, Yanbo Xue,A computational study of promotion dynamics and organizational efficiency,Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,Volume 560,2020,125194,ISSN 0378-4371.
5. Yaninee Songkajorn, Somnuk Aujirapongpan, Kritsakorn Jiraphanumes, KanitthaPattanasing,Organizational Strategic Intuition for High Performance: The Role of Knowledge-Based Dynamic Capabilities and Digital Transformation,Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity,Volume 8, Issue 3,2022,117,ISSN 2199-8531.
6. Lars Rass, Jan Treur, Wioleta Kucharska, Anna Wiewiora,Adaptive dynamical systems modelling of transformational organizational change with focus on organizational culture and organizational learning,
7. Cognitive Systems Research,Volume 79,2023,Pages 85-108,ISSN 1389-0417.
8. Seyedehfatemeh Golrizgashti, SeyedHossein Hosseini, Qingyun Zhu, Joseph Sarkis,Evaluating supply chain dynamics in the presence of product deletion,International Journal of Production Economics,Volume 255, 2023,108722,ISSN 0925-5273.
9. Fengxiu Zhang,Evaluating public organization performance under extreme weather events: Does organizational adaptive capacity matter?,Journal of Environmental Management,Volume 296,2021,113388,ISSN 0301-4797.
10. D. Asamoah, B. Agyei-Owusu, F.K. Andoh-Baidoo, E. Ayaburi,Inter-organizational systems use and supply chain performance: Mediating role of supply chain management capabilities,International Journal of Information Management,Volume 58,2021,102195,ISSN 0268-4012.
11. Yunpeng Sun, Mohsin Shahzad, Asif Razzaq,Sustainable organizational performance through blockchain technology adoption and knowledge management in China,Journal of Innovation & Knowledge,Volume 7, Issue 4,2022,100247,ISSN 2444-569X.
12. Ayse H. Ozgun, Mehves Tarim, Dursun Delen, Selim Zaim,Social capital and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation activities and intellectual capital,Healthcare Analytics,Volume 2,2022,100046,ISSN 2772-4425.
13. Ehsan Moradi, Seyed Mohammadbagher Jafari, Zahra Mohammadi Doorbash, Ashraf Mirzaei,Impact of organizational inertia on business model innovation, open innovation and corporate performance,Asia Pacific Management Review,Volume 26, Issue 4,2021,Pages 171-179,ISSN 1029-3132.
14. Ayush Raj, Bhupendra Sunil Mali, Bhuvnesh Kumar, Chandra Sen Singh, Gaurav Kumar Nainawat,System Dynamics Approach to Evaluate the Oil and Gas Supply Chain: A Case Study,Upstream Oil and Gas Technology,Volume 11,2023,100090,ISSN 2666-2604.
15. Mudhafar Alefari, Angel María Fernández Barahona, Konstantinos Salonitis,Modelling manufacturing employees’ performance based on a system dynamics approach,Procedia CIRP,Volume 72,2018,Pages 438-443,ISSN 2212-8271.
16. Richard A. Posthuma, Michael Charles Campion & Michael A. Campion (2018) A taxonomic foundation for evidence-based research on employee performance management, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27:2, 168-187.
17. Sikandar Ali Qalati, Zuhaib Zafar, Mingyue Fan, Mónica Lorena Sánchez Limón, Muhammad Bilawal Khaskheli,Employee performance under transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: A mediated model,Heliyon,Volume 8, Issue 11,2022,e11374,ISSN 2405-8440.
18. Nima Jafari Navimipour, Farnaz Sharifi Milani, Mehdi Hossenzadeh,A model for examining the role of effective factors on the performance of organizations,Technology in Society,Volume 55,2018,Pages 166-174,ISSN 0160-791X.
19. Viara Popova, Alexei Sharpanskykh,Modeling organizational performance indicators,Information Systems,Volume 35, Issue 4,2010,Pages 505-527,ISSN 0306-4379.
20. Han-Chung Chou, Wen-Min Lu, Qian Long Kweh, Chang-Yan Tsai,Using hierarchical network data envelopment analysis to explore the performance of national research and development organizations,Expert Systems with Applications,Volume 234,2023,121109,ISSN 0957-4174.