سیاستگذاری کارآمدی طرح‌های تفصیلی با تأکید بر زیست پذیری نمونه موردی: منطقه یک کلانشهر تهران
محورهای موضوعی : جغرافیا
حدیثه معظمی گودرزی
1
(دانشجوی دکتری گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری ، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران)
علی توکلان
2
(استادیار گروه تخصصی جغرافیا واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران)
کلید واژه: طرح تفصیلی, کارآمدی, زیست‌پذیری, تهران, سیاستگذاری,
چکیده مقاله :
سیاست‌های طرح تفصیلی شهرسازی به مجموعه‌ای از استراتژی‌ها و قوانین مرتبط با برنامه‌ریزی و توسعه شهرها اشاره دارد. این سیاست‌ها برای بهبود کیفیت زندگی شهروندان، حفاظت از محیط زیست، افزایش بهره‌وری و ایجاد یک شهرباز مطلوب تدوین می‌شوند. بعلاوه این سیاست‌ها به عنوان راهنمایی برای برنامه‌ریزان و مسئولان شهری در تصمیم‌گیری در زمینه توسعه شهرها و مدیریت فضاهای شهری مورد استفاده قرار می‌گیرند. تحقیق و مشارکت مداوم با جامعه نیز جزء اصول اساسی در طراحی و اجرای این سیاست‌ها است. هدف این تحقیق سیاستگذاری کارآمدی طرح‌های تفصیلی با تأکید بر زیست پذیری است. روش تحقیق از نظر هدف کاربردی و روش شناسی توصیفی - تحلیلی است. به منظور بررسی روایی محتوایی ابزار سنجش، پرسشنامه های مورد نظر در اختیار صاحبنظران و متخصصان امر در حوزه مورد نظر قرار گرفت. یافته های پژوهش نشان می دهد متغیر ساختاری تنها متغیری بوده است که توانسته است تنها به صورت مستقیم بر کارآمدی و اثربخشی طرح تفصیلی تأثیر بگذارد. با توجه به نتایج حاصل از تحلیل رگرسیون متغیر قانونی و اجرایی هم به صورت مستقیم و هم غیر مستقیم بر متغیر کارآمدی و اثربخشی طرح تفصیلی تأثیر گذاشته است. تأثیرات مستقیم و غیر مستقیم برای متغیر قانونی و اجرایی به ترتیب برابر با 429/0 و 201/0 است.
The city as a geographical, economic, political and sociological reality in each period of its development has been influenced by each of these factors and has influenced each of them. The complexity of each of these factors has created the complexity of the city as their spatial crystallization. Certainly, organizing and regulating the city and how it grows and evolves requires the thematics of the city and urban issues and then planning for it. In general, the belief in improving the environment is one of the sources of the idea of urban planning and perhaps its most important ideology. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the detailed plan of Tehran Region 1 with emphasis on livability. The research method is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical methodology. In order to evaluate the content validity of the assessment tool, the questionnaires were provided to experts and specialists in the field. Findings show that the structural variable was the only variable that could only directly affect the efficiency and effectiveness of the detailed design. According to the results of regression analysis, the legal and executive variables have both directly and indirectly affected the efficiency and effectiveness of the detailed plan. The direct and indirect effects for the legal and executive variables are 0.429 and 0.201, respectively.
Aghdas, A. S., Ezatpanah, B., & Babaye, B. B. (2021). Assessing the Livability of the Central Business Distric of Metropolises from the Perspective of Residents (Case study: Tabriz Metropolis). Quarterly Journal of Human Geography, 13(3), 646-666.
Akhavan, A., Salehi, E., & Toghyani, S. (2018). Evaluating the Effect of Environmental-Physical Factors on the Livability and Quality of Urban Streets (Case Study: Nader and Enghelab Streets in Sari City). Geography and Sustainability of Environment, 8(27), 15-29.
Alhashem, B. R., & Mousaie, M. (2010). Analysis (SWOT) of Civil Participation in The Designing of The Urban Management Planning Patterns (Case Study: Tehran Capital). Journal of Social Sciences, 47(47), 161.
Aminzade, B., & Roodaki, S. (2017). An Integrated Method for Assessments of Detailed Plans by Using Plan Process Result (PPR) and Process Policy-Plan/Program Implementation (PPIP) (Case Study: Region 6 of Shiraz Detailed Plan). Hoviate shahr, 11(29), 29-42.
Asgharnazariyan, & Nazari, S. (2013). Recognition The Problems Existing In The Bases And The System Of Planning Urban And Rural Projects With Tourism Logistics Approach (Provinces Ilam, Kermanshah, Lorestan). Quarterly Journal of Human Geography, 4(4), 1-15.
Barati, N., Heidari, F., & Fathi, M. S. (2019). Towards a Democratic Process in Urban Planning and Design; Assessing the Status of Citizens’ Involvement in Urban Plans and Projects in Iran. Bagh-e Nazar, 16(76), 5-20.
Boorboor, M., & Abbasi, M. (2021). The effect of hydropolitical crisis on the viability of geographical areas with emphasis on the border geography of Iran and Afghanistan. Quarterly Journal of Human Geography, 13(3), 134-156.
Cheshmi, M., Haqzad, A., Ramezanipour, M., & Ebrahimi, L. (2021). Investigation of Livability Indices in historical and Worn-Out Texture of Urban Neighborhoods Case study: District 12 of Tehran Metropolis. Journal of Sustainable City, 3(3), 87-95.
Clarke, W. G. (1962). Detail Planning for lands suspended from Sydney's Green Belt. Royal Australian Planning Institute Journal, 2(1), 17-20.
Dadfar, S., Massihi, V. M., R.Ahmadian, & Bandarabad, A. (2018). Developing the process of urban development plans based on foresight approach. Geography, 16(57), 30-46.
Hesari, A. R. E., Movahhed, A., Tavallaee, S., & Mousavi, M. N. (2016). Spatial Analysis of Tabriz Metropolitan Area With The Approach of Viability. Geographic Space, 16(54), 155-176.
Jajarmi, H. I. (2016). Critical study of urban development policies and plans in Iran. Quarterly of Social Studies and Research in Iran, 5(1), 79-102.
Kane, M., & Trochim, W. M. (2007). Concept mapping for planning and evaluation: Sage Publications, Inc.
Kashef, M. (2016). Urban livability across disciplinary and professional boundaries. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 5(2), 239-253.
Liu, J., Nijkamp, P., Huang, X., & Lin, D. (2017). Urban livability and tourism development in China: Analysis of sustainable development by means of spatial panel data. Habitat international, 68, 99-107.
Nasiri, E. (2019). Presentation of Structural Equation Modeling The Effect of Components of Social Capital Benefitability of Small Towns in Alborz Provinc. Human Geography Research Quarterly, 51(109), 715-730.
Nourian, F., & Khakpour, A. (2017). Providing a Model for Identifying Key Stakeholders in Urban Planning: Javadieh Neighborhood in Region 16th of Tehran. Journal of Architect, Urban Design & Urban Planning, 10(19), 271-281.
pendarian, l., daryabari, j., & bakhshandehnosrat, a. (2019). Pathology of Materialization of Urban Plans in Iran And Providing Proposal in Respect of its Promotion Case Study: District 22 of Tehran. Geography, 17(61), 25-37.
Rong, C. D.-r. X. (2006). Study on Detail Planning's Decision Data Management [J]. Modern Urban Research, 6.
Rotem-Mindali, O. (2012). Retail fragmentation vs. urban livability: Applying ecological methods in urban geography research. Applied Geography, 35(1-2), 292-299.
Safari, F., Dalir, K. H., & Mohammadi, M. R. P. (2020). Feasibility of Urban Fluid Plans In Planning Metropolises(A Case Study of Tabriz Metropolitan Area). Amayesh Journal, 49(49), 85-108.
Saitluanga, B. L. (2014). Spatial pattern of urban livability in Himalayan Region: A case of Aizawl City, India. Social indicators research, 117(2), 541-559.
Sarvar, R. (2016). Applied geography and Spatial planinning, Tehran: Samt
Sasanpoor, F. (2018). Investigating the Feasibility of Urumia Urban Areas Livability using RALSPI Model. Journal of Applied Researches in Geographical Sciences, 18(48), 241-258.
Shahnavashi, Y., Anvari, M. R., & Bostani, M. K. (2021). Explain and Prioritization the Livability of Urban Region (Case Study: Zahedan City). Quarterly of Geography (Regional Planing), 11(1), 613-630.
Shieh, E., Habibi, K., & Saidi, M. (2015). Design Led Planning as a New Approach to Urbanism. Bagh-e Nazar, 12(35), 3-14.
Zhan, D., Kwan, M.-P., Zhang, W., Fan, J., Yu, J., & Dang, Y. (2018). Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities, 79, 92-101. Abedini, A., & Karimi, R. (2017). Assess the Livability of Cities Based on FANP Method (Case Study: 15 Areas of Urmia). Journal of Environmental Studies, 42(80), 735-752.
_||_