آثار تقابل سیاسی ایالات متحده و چین بر بحران امنیتی شبه جزیره کره (2016-2022)
محورهای موضوعی : اندیشه سیاسی
اردشیر سنایی
1
*
,
حیدر کشاورز
2
,
حمید شیرزاد
3
1 -
2 - رشته روابط بین الملل،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکزی
3 - دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،واحد تهران مرکزی،تهران،ایران.
کلید واژه: ایالات متحده, چین, شبه جزیره کره, کره شمالی, کره جنوبی,
چکیده مقاله :
در فاصله سال‌های ۲۰۱۶ تا ۲۰۲۲، تقابل سیاسی بین ایالات متحده و چین به‌طور چشمگیری بر بحران امنیتی شبه‌جزیره کره تأثیر گذاشته است. سوال اصلی این پژوهش این است که تقابل سیاسی میان ایالات متحده و چین چه آثاری بر گسترش بحران امنیتی شبه‌جزیره کره داشته است؟ فرضیه مطرح شده این است که تقابل سیاسی میان ایالات متحده و چین، با افزایش فشارهای سیاسی و نظامی، موجب تشدید بحران امنیتی در شبه‌جزیره کره شده است، به‌گونه‌ای که این تقابل به افزایش فعالیت‌های هسته‌ای و موشکی کره شمالی و تقویت اتحادهای نظامی در منطقه منجر گردیده است. یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که تقابل‌ها در شبه‌جزیره کره به شکل‌گیری رقابت‌های امنیتی، ایجاد معضلات امنیتی، افزایش تهدیدها و نگرانی‌های امنیتی، تأثیرگذاری بر اتحادها و تقویت همکاری‌های امنیتی انجامیده است. این مقاله با هدف کاربردی و رویکرد توصیفی–تحلیلی، به تحلیل و تفسیر موضوع با استفاده از روش مطالعه موردی و منابع اسنادی و کتابخانه‌ای معتبر در حوزه‌های سیاسی و امنیتی پرداخته است. همچنین، جستجو در پایگاه‌های داده برای گردآوری اطلاعات لازم انجام شده است.
Abstract:
Between 2016 and 2022, the political confrontation between the United States and China significantly impacted the security crisis on the Korean Peninsula. The main question of this research is how the political confrontation between the United States and China has affected the expansion of the security crisis on the Korean Peninsula. The hypothesis suggests that the political confrontation between the United States and China, with increasing political and military pressures, has intensified the security crisis on the Korean Peninsula, leading to an increase in North Korea's nuclear and missile activities and the strengthening of military alliances in the region. The findings indicate that the confrontations on the Korean Peninsula have resulted in the formation of security competitions, the creation of security dilemmas, the rise of threats and security concerns, and influence on alliances and the strengthening of security cooperation. This article, with an applied objective and a descriptive-analytical approach, analyzes and interprets the topic using a case study method and reliable political and security sources from documentary and library-based research. Additionally, a search in databases has been conducted to gather the necessary information.
1. Ali, A. (2023). Thucydides Resurrected: Confrontation Between the US and China for Global Dominance. Pakistan Horizon, 76(3), 47-60.
2. Anatolyevich, K. O. (2019). The security issues in US-China strategic competition. International journal of professional science, (7), 73-80.
3. Andersen, M. S. (2018). Balance of Power. The Encyclopedia of Diplomacy, 1-12. 4. Basu, Titli(2019)Introduction: Mapping the Korean Conundrum, Editor:Titli Basu, Major Powers and the Korean Peninsula:Politics, Policies and Perspectives, Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, www.kwpub.com.
5. Cuong, N. M., Chelabi, K., Anjum, S., Sateeshchandra, N. G., Samoylenko, S., Silwizya, K., & Nghiem, T. (2024). US-China global competition and dilemma for Vietnam's strategic choices in the South China Sea conflict. Heritage and Sustainable Development, 6(1), 349-364.
6. Fingar, T., & Lampton, D. M. (2023). China’s America Policy: Back to the Future. The Washington Quarterly, 46(4), 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2023.2285541.
7. Fortmann, M., Paul, T. V., & Wirtz, J. (2004). Conclusions: balance of power at the turn of the new century. Balance of Power: Theory and Practice in the 21st Century, 360-374.
8. Frohman, B., Rafaelof, E., & Dale-Huang, A. (2022, January 24). U.S.-China economic and security review commission staff research report. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. https://www.uscc.gov.
9. Healy, B., & Stein, A. (1973). The balance of power in international history: theory and reality. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 17(1), 33-61.
10. HORNUNG, J. W., GUNNESS, K., ROONEY, B., MCCORMICK, D., GREK, L., SCHWANKHART, R. A., ... & LINO, M. R. (2024). Fighting Abroad from an Ally’s Land.
11. Hwang, J. (2022). The US-China Rivalry and South Korea's New Morth Korea Policy: Its Prospects and Implications. The Journal of East Asian Affairs, 5-33.
12. Institute for Security & Development Policy. (2017, October). THAAD on the Korean Peninsula. BACKGROUNDER. www.isdp.eu.
13. Jerotijevic, Z., & Palevic, M. (2016). The balance of power: The security concept of the international community. In Ekonomika (Vol. 62, Issue 1, pp. 141–150). Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES). https://doi.org/10.5937/ekonomika1601141j.
14. Jie, D. (2020). The emerging ideological security dilemma between China and the US. China International Strategy Review, 2(2), 184-196.
15. Lee, S. (2022). East Asian Security in the Multipolar World Order: A Review on the Security Threat Assessment of the Korean Peninsula Amid the Restructuring of International Order. Analyses & Alternatives, 6(2), 37-78.
16. Lilleaas, C. (2024). Nuclear dilemmas to die for.
17. Maduz, L. (2021). Confidence and Security-building on the Korean Peninsula and the Role of Switzerland. ETH Zurich.
18. Manyin. Mark E,Chanlett-Avery. Emma,Nikitin. Mary Beth D,Rennack. Dianne E,(2022),Diplomacy with North Korea: A Status Report, Updated February 3, Congressional Research Service.
19. Minghao, Z. (2023). The US Strategy to Maintain Hegemony and the Future of China-US Relations. China International Studies, (103).
20. Modebadze, V. (2020). US-CHINA RIVALRY FOR GLOBAL HEGEMONY. In Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, Institute for Research and European Studies - Bitola (Vol. 2, pp. 167–173). Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, Institute for Research and European Studies - Bitola. https://doi.org/10.47305/jlia2020167m.
21. Mushinda, B. N., Lohalo, G. O., Benkenya, L., Balebo, P. M., Mbuku, J. G., Diur, K., ... & Bura, N. (2024). From Rising to Superpower: Pragmatism and the Community of a Shared Future for Mankind in Chinese Foreign Policy. Open Journal of Political Science, 14(02), 292-315.
22. Nagy, S. (2023). Drivers of US-China Strategic Competition: Understanding the Chinese Perspective. Institute for Security & Development Policy, 1-2.
23. Nilsson-Wright, J., & Jie, Y. (2021). South Korean Foreign Policy Innovation amid Sino-US Rivalry: Strategic Partnerships and Managed Ambiguity. London: Chatham House.
24. Ross, R. S. (2023). China Looks at the Korean Peninsula: The ‘Two Transitions’. In Survival December 2021-January 2022: Trials of Liberalism (pp. 129-158). Routledge.
25. Rudolf, P. (2020). The Sino-American World Conflict (No. 3/2020). SWP Research Paper.
26. Smeltz, D. (2022). Thinking Nuclear: South Korean Attitudes on Nuclear Weapons.
27. TAYLOR, J. R. (2024). TENSIONS ON THE PENINSULA: Strategic Communication for the US-Northeast Asia Alliance System. Æther: A Journal of Strategic Airpower & Spacepower, 3(2).
28. TAYLOR, J. R. (2024). TENSIONS ON THE PENINSULA: Strategic Communication for the US-Northeast Asia Alliance System. Æther: A Journal of Strategic Airpower & Spacepower, 3(2).
29. Underwood, E., & Paul, T. V. (2020). Balance of Power. Oxford University Press.
30. Wang Jisi, Hu Ran. 2019. From Cooperative Partnership to Strategic Competition: a Review of China– U.S. Relations 2009–.2019 // China International Strategy Review. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42533-019-00007-w Accessed 20.08.2019.
31. Wen, M. (2022). Exporting the American Dream? Ideology and US China Policy Since 9/11. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 8(03n04), 263-286.
32. Xu,L. (2024).The Cause of the Current Conflict Between China and the United States.Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,41,217-222.
33. Yang, X. (2023). Why can’t the drama stop? US–China rivalry and security triangulation on the Korean peninsula. In Contemporary Politics (Vol. 29, Issue 5, pp. 640–658). Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2023.2215115.
34. Zhao, M. (2019). Is a New Cold War Inevitable? Chinese Perspectives on US–China Strategic Competition. In The Chinese Journal of International Politics (Vol. 12, Issue 3, pp. 371–394). Oxford University Press (OUP). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poz010 .