مطالعه کیفی خشونت علیه زنان بلوچ

محورهای موضوعی : زن و جامعه

سمیه رئیسی ¹ , داریوش بوستانی ²

1 - کارشناس ارشد جامعه شناسی ، مربی دانشگاه ولایت، ایرانشهر ، ایران
2 - دکتری جامعه شناسی ، دانشیار دانشگاه باهنر ، کرمان ، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1398/07/02 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/05/09 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/05/01

کلید واژه: مردسالاری, خشونت خانگی, نظریه زمینه ای, زنان بلوچ,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف: خشونت خانگی علیه زنان خطر قابل توجهی برای سلامتی زنان، خانواده و جامعه  به همراه دارد. بررسی و مطالعه این موضوع در بین زنان بلوچ دارای پیچیدگی ها ی روش شناسی و فرهنگی می باشد .این مطالعه با بهره گیری از رویکرد تفسیرگرایی اجتماعی به بررسی خشونت علیه زنان در میان زنان بلوچ در شهرستان ایرانشهر می پردازد. روش­: نمونه مورد مطالعه شامل 18 نفر از زنانی است که به دادگستری ایرانشهر مراجعه کرده اند و  با اشباع نظری در حجم نمونه  و با روش نمونه گیری هدفمند و نمونه گیری نظری که خاص روش شناسی کیفی می باشد به دست آمده اند. برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها و رسیدن به نظریه نهایی از روش شناسی نظریه زمینه ای بهره گرفته شده است . یافته­ها: نتایج این پژوهش سیزده مقوله عمده، مردسالاری ، سایه طلاق ، اعتیاد ، پدرمکانی، ننگ طلاق، اردواج اجباری ، ازدواج مجدد و تهدید به آن ، انواع خشونت ها علیه زنان ، خشونت خانواده ی شوهر ، سیاست محتاطانه ی خانواده ی مشارک کننده ، تحمل خشونت ، انروا و کناره گیری ، طلاق  ابزار قدرت مردان و یک مقوله هسته مردسالاری ، گفتمان قدرت و خشونت علیه زنان می باشد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Introduction: Domestic violence against women poses a significant risk to the health of women, the family, and society. The study of this issue among Baluch women has methodological and cultural complexities. This study uses the approach of social interpretivism to investigate violence against women among Baluch women in Iranshahr. Methods: The study sample includes 18 women referred to the Iranshahr Court and obtained by theoretical saturation in the sample size and purposeful sampling method and theoretical sampling, specific to qualitative methodology. The grounded theory methodology has been used to analyze the data and reach the final theory. Findings:The findings of this study are thirteen major categories: Patriarchy, Shadow of divorce, Addiction, Paternalism, Stigma of divorce, Forced marriage, Remarriage and threats against it, Types of violence against women, Husband's family violence, Cautious family policy, Tolerance of violence Envy and resignation, divorce is the tool of men's power and a core category of patriarchy, the discourse of power and violence against women.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Abbott, P. & Wallace, C. (2006). Sociology of women. Translated by Manijeh Najm Iraqi, Tehran: Nay. (Persian)


2. Abdipour, A. (2000). Aggression in the family. Thesis of the Department of Social Sciences, University of Isfahan.


3. Banerjee, A., Ferrara, L. & Orozaco, V. (2019). Entertainment, Education, and Attitudes Toward Domestic Violence. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 109():133-37. https://www.aeaweb.org/articles


4. Camarin, G. (2020). Exploring community narratives of violence against women among domestic violence responders in Guam- American journal of community Psycology, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com


5. Center for Women's Studies and Research (2000). Report on the workshop on violence against women and methods of prevention and protection of its victims, Deputy Minister of Health, Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education.


6. Clark, C., Silverman, J., Shahrouri, M., Eversan-rose, S. &Groce, N. (2010). The Role. Extended Family in Women’s Risk of Intimate Partner Violence in Jordan, social science & medicine, Vol.7, Issue.  pp. 144-151. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article


7.  Coker, A., L., Daige Hall, S., Robert, E. M.  & Melissa J. K.  (2000). Frequency and Correlate of Intimate Partner Violence by Type: Physical, Sexual, and Psychological Battering. American Journal of Public Health, 90 (4), 553-559. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/


8.  Dolatian, M., Khajal, H., Zahiroddin, A., Velaie, N. & Alavi Majd, H. (2012). Evaluation of Prevalence of Domestic Violence and its Role on Mental Health.Pajoohandeh; 16 (6):277-83. (Persian) https://pajoohande.sbmu.ac.ir/browse.php


9. Douki, S. F., Nacef, A., Belhadj, A., Bouas ker, A. & Ghachem, R. (2010).Violence Against Women in Arab and Islaamic Countries, Archives of Women Mental Health .Vol .6, pp. 165-171 https://link.springer.com/article/


10. Giddens, A. (2000). Sociology, translated by Manouchehr Sabouri, Tehran: Ney.


11. Glaser, B. & Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory “Transaction Publishers, U.S.Publisher.


12. Glaser, B. (2001).The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description, Socilogy Press.


13. Goffman, I. (2007). Dagh Nang: Thinking of a solution for lost identity, translated by Masoud Kianpour, Tehran: Markaz.


14. Haqqi, s. & Paizi .A. (2010). Prevalence of Domestic Violence and associated Depression in Married Women at aCare Hospital in Karachi , Social and Behavior Science , Vol. 5, pp.1090-1097 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article


15.   Hosseini badenjani, S.M., Beyrami, M. &Hashemi, T. (2012). The prediction of women vulnerabil-ity (family's women's supervisor) against stress based on the ratio of social support, coping strat-egies and locus of control. Quarterly Journal of Psychological Studies. 8(1):117-40. (Persian). https://www.sid.ir/en/Journal/ViewPaper.


16. Jaoko, J.O. (2005). Ecological Crrelates of Violence against Women. PhD Thesis.United states: University of Texas


17. Kabiri, A., Saadati, M. & Noaozi, V. (2018). Sociological analysis of factors affecting domestic violence against women (Case study: married women in Urmia). Women and Society Quarterly, 9(34), pp. 295-320. http://jzvj.miau.ac.ir/article_3155.html


18.  Kar, M. (2000). Research on Violence against Women, Tehran: Roshangaran.


19. Kaur, R. & Garg, S. (2010). Domestic violence against women: A qualitative study in a rural community, Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Health , 22(2), pp.242-251 https://journals.sagepub.com


20. Khosravi, Z. & Khaghanifard, M. (2004). Investigating the relationship between spousal abuse and suicidal ideation and harm to women in women in Tehran, Women's Studies, 2(6), pp. 113-99 https://www.sid.ir/fa/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx


21. LaBore, K.Ahmed, T., Rashid, R.U.&   Ahmed, R.(2019). Prevalence and Predictors of Violence Against Women in Pakistan, Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518824652


22. Mirzaei, A., Mohammadi, F. & Faizollahi, A. (2020). Sociological study of violence against women in the family and the factors affecting it (Case study: Kermanshah). Women and Society Quarterly, 11(43), pp. 279-322 https://iranjournals.nlai.ir/handle/


23. Moazemi, Sh. (2004). Protecting women from domestic violence, Social Welfare Quarterly, Year 3, Issue. http://ensani.ir/fa/article


24. Mohammadpour, A.  (2010). Anti-logic and design methods in qualitative methodology, Vol 1, Tehran: Sociologists (first edition).


25. Mohebbi, S. F. (2001). Women's Social Pathology: Violence against Women, Women's Book, No. 14, pp. 6-19 https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx


26. Neuman, L. (2006/2000). Social Research Methods: Quantitative and Qualitative Approach, Third Edition, London: A llyn and Bacon.


27. Patton, M. Q. (1986).Utilization – Focued Evaluation, Second Edition,Newbury Park, CA, sage Publication Ltd


28. Saberian, M., Atashnafas, E. & Behnam, B. (2003). Evaluation of domestic violence in women referring to health centers in Semnan, Scientific Journal of Semnan University of Medical Sciences, 6(2) https://www.sid.ir/Fa/Journal/ViewPaper.aspx


29. Schaeffer. F. T. & Lamn, R. P. (1992). Sociology, New York, MC, Graw Hill.


30. Sloane, C., Burke, J. E, Robin, C. R. (2011). Latina Women’s Experiences with Intimate Partner Violence: A Grounded Theory Approach, Copyright©Family Violence Prevention Fund. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Latina-Women


31. Sohrabzadeh, M. & Nouri, Z. (2020).  Model Designing of Determining Factors Affecting Violence against Women, women and culture, 12(43), pp. 101-113. http://waocp.com/journal/index.php/apjec/article


32. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990 /1998). Basic of Qualitative Research (2nd Edition 1998), London: SAGE Publications


33. Taavoni, M., Ganji, M. & Gomashi, S.(2018). The Criminological Study of Violence against Women in Zahedan City, Research Journal of Women, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies, Year 9, Issue 3. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx


34. Tavassoli, A. &   Monirifar, S. (2009). Sociological study of the effect of socio-economic status on violence against women during marital life, Family Research Quarterly, 5(20), pp. 441-454. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx


35. World Health Organization (WHO) (2008/2019). Violence against Women. Fact Sheet, no. 239. World Organization, Genva, Switzerland. Retrieved 15 August 2008, http://who.intfactsheets/


36. Zahravi,(2000). Violence against women in Sistan and Baluchestan province (research in 5 provinces and south of Tehran), National Observer: Center for Presidential Women's Participation


37. Zamani Moghadam, M. & Hassanvandi, S. (2018). A Qualitative Study of Domestic Violence Against Housewives in Khorramabad, Quarterly Journal of Women and Society, Year 10, Issue 3, pp. 145-170 http://jzvj.miau.ac.ir/m/article