ویژگی‌های روان‌سنجی مقیاس ارضای نیازهای بنیادین در روابط با دوستان در دانشجویان
محورهای موضوعی : تربیتیفرهاد تنهای رشوانلو 1 , طلیعه سعیدی رضوانی 2 , هادی صمدیه 3 , حسین کارشکی 4
1 - دکتری روان‌شناسی تربیتی، گروه روان‌شناسی، موسسه آموزش عالی غیردولتی غیر انتفاعی شاندیز، مشهد، ایران
2 - دانشجوی دکتری روان‌شناسی تربیتی، گروه روان‌شناسی مشاوره و تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
3 - استادیار، گروه روان‌شناسی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه بیرجند، بیرجند، ایران
4 - دانشیار، گروه روان‌شناسی مشاوره و تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
کلید واژه: روابط دوستانه, دانشجویان, ساختار عاملی, نیازهای بنیادین, اعتباریابی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از این پژوهش اعتباریابی و بررسی ساختار عاملی مقیاس ارضای نیازهای بنیادین در روابط با دوستان در دانشجویان بود. در یک طرح توصیفی و اعتباریابی آزمون، طی دو مطالعه به ترتیب 172 و 228 نفر از دانشجویان دانشگاه بیرجند به شیوۀ نمونه گیری تصادفی چندمرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند و مقیاس‌های ارضای نیازهای بنیادین در روابط (La Guardia, et al., 2000) ، احساس تنهایی اجتماعی و عاطفی بزرگسالان (Ditommaso et al., 2004) ، رضایت از زندگی (Diener et al., 1985) و افسردگی، اضطراب و استرس (Lovibond, & Lovibond, 1995) را تکمیل کردند. همسانی درونی، روایی عاملی اکتشافی، تأییدی، ملاکی و سازه با نرم افزارهای SPSS.16 و AMOS.24 مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج نشان داد که مقیاس، ساختاری سه عاملی با واریانس تبیین شده 92/70 درصد دارد. تحلیل عاملی تأییدی مرتبۀ دوم نیز به تأیید رسید. مقیاس از پایایی سازۀ مناسبی برخوردار بود. روایی همگرای مقیاس در مورد رضایت از زندگی و روایی واگرای آن در ارتباط با احساس تنهایی اجتماعی و افسردگی به تأیید رسید (01/0≥P). بر حسب سن، جنسیت و وضعیت تأهل نیز تفاوت معناداری به دست نیامد (05/0<P). به نظر می‌رسد، مقیاس ارضای نیازهای بنیادین در روابط، در دانشجویان از پایایی و روایی مناسبی برخوردار است.
The purpose of this study was to validate and evaluate the factor structure of the scale of The Basic Need Satisfaction in Relationships with Friends Scale in students. In a descriptive and validation study, 172 and 228 students from Birjand University were selected through multi-stage random sampling method and completed the Basic Need Satisfaction in Relationships Scale (La Guardia et al. 2000), Life Satisfaction Test (Diener et al. 1985), The Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale for Adults (Ditommaso et al. 2004), and Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (Lovibond, & Lovibond, 1995). Internal consistency, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and constructive validity was evaluated using SPSS.16 and AMOS.24 software. The results showed that the scale had three-factor structure with the variance explained 70.92%. The second-order confirmatory factor analysis confirmed. The scale had good construction reliability. The convergent validity confirmed in relation to life satisfaction and its divergent validity in relation to the social loneliness and depression (P≤0.01). There was no significant difference based on age, gender and marital status (P>0.05). It seems that the basic need satisfaction in relationships with friends scale has a good reliability and validity in students.
Coatsworth, J. D., & Conroy, D. E. (2009). The effects of autonomy-supportive coaching need satisfaction, and self-perceptions on initiative and identity in youth swimmers. Developmental Psychology, 45, 320–328.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological bulletin, 112(1), 155-159.
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A First Course in Factor Analysis, 2nd Edn. Hillsdale, NJ.
Davari, A., & Rezazade, A. (2014). Structural equation modeling with PLS software. Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi [Persian].
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of research in personality, 19(2), 109-134.
Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.
Ditommaso, E., Brannen, C., & Best, L. A. (2004). Measurement and validity characteristics of the short version of the social and emotional loneliness scale for adults. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(1), 99-119.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. Journal of educational psychology, 95(1), 148-162.
González, L., Tomás, I., Castillo, I., Duda, J. L., & Balaguer, I. (2017). A test of basic psychological needs theory in young soccer players: time‐lagged design at the individual and team levels. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 27(11), 1511-1522.
Guilbault, V., & Philippe, F. L. (2017). Commitment in romantic relationships as a function of partners’ encoding of important couple-related memories. Memory, 25(5), 595-606.
Hadden, B. W., Rodriguez, L. M., Knee, C. R., & Porter, B. (2015). Relationship autonomy and support provision in romantic relationships. Motivation and Emotion, 39(3), 359-373.
Jowkar, B., & Salimi, A. (2011). Psychometric properties of the short form of the social and emotional loneliness scale for adults (SELSA-S). International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 5(4), 311-317.
Kanat‐Maymon, Y., Roth, G., Assor, A., & Raizer, A. (2016). Controlled by love: The harmful relational consequences of perceived conditional positive regard. Journal of Personality, 84(4), 446-460.
Karami, M., Kadivar, P., Ghanbari Panah, A., & Estaki, M. (2018). Modeling of Personality Traits and Goal Orientation by Mediating Role of Emotion Regulation and Self Determination in Male High School Students. Journal of Modern Psychological Researches, 13(51), 163-183 [Persian].
Kashdan, T. B., Mishra, A., Breen, W. E., & Froh, J. J. (2009). Gender differences in gratitude: Examining appraisals, narratives, the willingness to express emotions, and changes in psychological needs. Journal of personality, 77(3), 691-730.
Ketabi, A. M. (2012). Psychometric properties of the test of basic psychological needs and its relationship with psychological well-being in students of Islamic Azad University of Tehran. Unpublished Thesis, Islamic Azad University Central Tehran Branch, Tehran [Persian].
Keyhan, J., & Kazemzadehbeytali, M. (2018). The effect of teacher autonomy support and causality orientations of autonomy on educational alienation of second grade high school students with mediating role basic psychological needs. Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology, 19(3), 90-100 [Persian].
Koh, K. T., Wang, J. C., Erikson, K., & Côté, J. (2012). Experience in competitive youth sport and needs satisfaction: The Singapore story. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 43(1), 15-32.
La Guardia, J. G., Ryan, R. M., Couchman, C. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: a self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 79(3), 367-384.
Langdon, J., Sturges, D., & Schlote, R. (2018). Flipping the Classroom: Effects on Course Experience, Academic Motivation, and Performance in an Undergraduate Exercise Science Research Methods Course. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(4), 13-27.
Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behavior research and therapy, 33(3), 335-343.
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological methods, 4(1), 84-99.
Maroufizadeh, S., Ghaheri, A., Samani, R. O., & Ezabadi, Z. (2016). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale (SWLS) in Iranian infertile women. International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine, 14(1), 57-62.
Mauras, C. P., Grolnick, W. S., & Friendly, R. W. (2013). Time for “the talk”... Now what? Autonomy support and structure in mother-daughter conversations about sex. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(4), 458-481.
Milyavskaya, M., Gingras, I., Mageau, G. A., Koestner, R., Gagnon, H., Fang, J., & Boiché, J. (2009). Balance across contexts: Importance of balanced need satisfaction across various life domains. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(8), 1031-1045.
Moradi, M., Sheikholeslami, R., Ahmadzadeh, M., & Cheraghi, A. (2014). Social support, basic psychological needs and psychological well-being: examining a causal model in employed women. Journal of Developmental psychology (Iranian Psychologists), 10(39), 297-309 [Persian].
Patrick, H., Knee, C. R., Canevello, A., & Lonsbary, C. (2007). The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(3), 434-457.
Philippe, F. L., Koestner, R., & Lekes, N. (2013). On the directive function of episodic memories in people's lives: A look at romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 164-179.
Ratelle, C. F., Simard, K., & Guay, F. (2013). University students’ subjective well-being: The role of autonomy support from parents, friends, and the romantic partner. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(3), 893-910.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
Ryan, R. M., Curren, R. R., & Deci, E. L. (2013). What humans need: Flourishing in Aristotelian philosophy and self-determination theory. In A. S. Waterman (Ed.), The best within us: Positive psychology perspectives on eudaimonia (pp. 57-75). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
Sahebi, A., Asghari, M., & Salari, R. (2005). Validation of Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) for an Iranian Population. Journal of Developmental psychology (Iranian Psychologists), 1(4), 36-54 [Persian].
Saunders, C., Huta, V., & Sweet, S. N. (2018). Physical Activity, Well‐Being, and the Basic Psychological Needs: Adopting the SDT Model of Eudaimonia in a Post‐Cardiac Rehabilitation Sample. Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, 10(3), 347-367.
Sheldon, K. M., & Niemiec, C. P. (2006). It's not just the amount that counts: Balanced need satisfaction also affects well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 91(2), 331-341.
Simões, F., & Alarcão, M. (2014). Promoting well-being in school-based mentoring through basic psychological needs support: Does it really count?. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 407-424.
Sjöblom, K., Mälkki, K., Sandström, N., & Lonka, K. (2016). Does Physical Environment Contribute to Basic Psychological Needs? A Self-Determination Theory Perspective on Learning in the Chemistry Laboratory. Frontline Learning Research, 4(1), 17-39.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidel, L. S. (2015). Using Multivariate Statistics (Baloğlu, M., Çev. Ed.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Taylor, I. M., & Bruner, M. W. (2012). The social environment and developmental experiences in elite youth soccer. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13(4), 390-396.
Uysal, A., Lin, H. L., Knee, C. R., & Bush, A. L. (2012). The association between self-concealment from one’s partner and relationship well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(1), 39-51.
Van den Broeck, A., Ferris, D. L., Chang, C. H., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195-1229.
Wang, R., Liu, H., Jiang, J., & Song, Y. (2017). Will materialism lead to happiness? A longitudinal analysis of the mediating role of psychological needs satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 312-317.
_||_