• صفحه اصلی
  • تأثیر نرم‌افزار آموزشی «میشا و کوشا» بر انگیزه پیشرفت و پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان در درس علوم تجربی

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله


کد مقاله : 1026-ICT (R6) بازدید : 307 صفحه: 45 - 66

نوع مقاله: پژوهشی

تأثیر نرم‌افزار آموزشی «میشا و کوشا» بر انگیزه پیشرفت و پیشرفت تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان در درس علوم تجربی

محورهای موضوعی : فن‎آوری اطلاعات

حسین مومنی مهموئی 1 , مجید پاکدامن 2 , مجید دادمهر 3

1 - استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد تربیت حیدریه، باشگاه پژوهشگران جوان و نخبگان، تربت حیدریه، ایران
2 - استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد قاینات، قاینات، ایران
3 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد آموزش ابتدایی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد قاینات، قاینات، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1392/03/06 تاریخ پذیرش : 1393/07/04 تاریخ انتشار : 1392/11/12

کلید واژه: پیشرفت تحصیلی, نرم‌افزار آموزشی میشا و کوشا, انگیزه پیشرفت, درس علوم تجربی پایه پنجم,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی تأثیر نرم‌افزار آموزشی میشا و کوشا بر انگیزه پیشرفت و پیشرفت تحصیلی درس علوم تجربی دانش‌آموزان پسر پایه پنجم مقطع ابتدایی شهرستان بیرجند بود. پژوهش حاضر شبه آزمایشی با طرح پیش‌آزمون ـ پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل است. جامعه آماری کلیه دانش‌آموزان پسر پایه پنجم مقطع ابتدایی شهرستان بیرجند در سال تحصیلی 92 – 1391 بود. از میان آنها تعداد 50 نفر به شیوه تصادفی خوشه‌ای انتخاب شدند. یک گروه (25 نفر) به عنوان گروه آزمایش و گروه دیگر (25 نفر) به عنوان گروه گواه در نظر گرفته شد. در گروه آزمایش، از آموزش نرم‌افزاری به مدت دو ماه و در گروه گواه از آموزش معمول کلاسی استفاده شد. برای گردآوری اطلاعات از پرسش‌نامه انگیزه پیشرفت برنارد واینر با ضریب پایایی 72/0 و آزمون‌های پیشرفت تحصیلی محقق‌ساخته استفاده شد. به منظور تعیین پایایی آزمون‌های پیشرفت تحصیلی، ضریب آلفای کرونباخ محاسبه شد که 75/0 برای پیش‌آزمون و 71/0 برای پس‌آزمون به دست آمد. داده‌ها با روش تحلیل کواریانس تجزیه و تحلیل شد. نتایج این پژوهش نشان داد که نرم‌افزار آموزشی میشا و کوشا بر انگیزه پیشرفت و پیشرفت تحصیلی درس علوم تجربی دانش‌آموزان پسر پایه پنجم مقطع ابتدایی تأثیر مثبت دارد ( 001/0 > P).

چکیده انگلیسی:

The main objective of the research was to investigate the effect of educational software "Misha and Koosha" on achievement motivation and academic achievement in science course of fifth grade boys elementary students in the city of Birjand. This research was quasi-experimental study with a pretest - posttest design with a control group. The statistical population was all the fifth grade male students of elementary schools in the city of Birjand in the academic year 2012-13, among which 50 students were selected by random cluster sampling method. One group (n = 25) was selected as the experimental group and the other group (n = 25) as the control group. In the experimental group, the software training and in the control group, the general classroom education was used for two months. To collect data, Bernard Weiner motivation questionnaire (with reliability of 0.72) and researcher made tests of academic achievement used. Cronbach Alpha Coefficient was used to determine the reliability of the academic achievement tests that obtained 0.75 for the pre-test and 0.71 for the post-test. The data were analyzed with covariance analysis. The results showed that the "Misha and Koosha" educational software had a positive effect on achievement motivation and academic achievement of science course in fifth grade boys elementary students (P>0.001).  

منابع و مأخذ:


  1. Adeyemi, B. A. (2012). Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) on students’ achievement in social studies in Osun state, Nigeria. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 269-277.
    2.
  2. Ahmadi, M., Fallah, V., & Mirzakhani, S. (2011). Comparing the effect of interactive and non-interactive multimedia training on elementary student's learning. Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 1(4), 120-121. (in Persian).
    3.
  3. Almekhlafi, A. (2006). The effect of Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on United Arab Emirates EFL school students, achievement and attitude. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 121- 142.
    4.
  4. Baroo, L., Markman, L., & Rouse, C. E. (2009). Technology edge: The educational benefits of computer-aided instruction. American Economic Journal, Economic Policy, 1, 52-74.
    5.
  5. Baylor, L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology- using classrooms? Computer & Education, 39(2), 395-414.
    6.
  6. Cherry, S. (2002). Twelve reasons to use multimedia projects in the classroom. Retrieved from http://www.ezedia.com/education/classroom/library/Twelve- Reasons.html
    7.
  7. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.
    8.
  8. Daeezadeh, H., Hoseinzadeh, B., & Ghaznavi, M. (2010). The role of ICT on the academic performance of secondary school students. Journal of Leadership and Management Training, 4(4), 81-97. (in Persian).
    9.
  9. Fahimi, M. (2001). The role of information technology in education. Rahyaft, 25, 218-223. (in Persian).
    10.
  10. Fazli Seyedmahaleh, S. F. (2010).  School have the means to do media training and quidance by teachers in Mazandaran. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Sari: Islamic Azad University. (in Persian).
    11.
  11. Heidari, Gh., Modanloo, Y., Niaz Azari, M., & Jafari Geloucheh, A. (2010). Comparing the effect of educational software and traditional teaching English on students achievement. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 1(1), 92-115. (in Persian).
    12.
  12. Hoyer, J. (2005). Technology integration in education: The dilemma of shifting paradigms. International Journal of Learning, 12(6), 1-8.
    13.
  13. Kaffashi, H. (2010).  Educational software. Educational Technology, 7, 32. (in Persian).
    14.
  14. Kebritchi, M., Hirumi, A., & Bai, H. (2010). The effects of modern mathematics computer games on mathematics achievement and class motivation. Computers & Education, 55(2), 427-443.
    15.
  15. Lou, Y. (2004). Learning to solve complex problems through between-group collaboration in project-based online courses. Distance Education, 25(1), 49–66.
    16.
  16. Najafi, H. (2006). Impact of information technology on students achievement Ardabil's high schools in years 2005-2006. Peyk-e-Noor, 3(6), 82-93. (in Persian).
    17.
  17. Nelson, T. (2001). What is the logo? Retrieved May 20, 2002, from http//www.logo foundation.com
    18.
  18. Olga Pilli, A., & Meral Aksu, B. (2013). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the achievement, attitudes and retention of fourth grade mathematics students in North Cyprus. Computers & Education, 62, 62-71.
    19.
  19. Pashasharifi, H. (2009). Questionnaires of research in the field of psychology, counseling, educational sciences and sociology. Tehran: Sokhan. (in Persian).
    20.
  20. Razavi, S. A. (2007). Modern Topics in Educational Technology. Ahvaz: University of Shahid Chamran. (in Persian).
    21.
  21. Richey, R. C. (2008). Reflections on the 2008 AECT definitions of the field. Tech Trends, 52(1), 24-25.
    22.
  22. Saffarian, S., Fallah,V., & Mirhoseini, S. H. (2010).  Comparing the effect of educational software and traditional teaching methods on learning mathematics. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 1(2), 21-26. (in Persian).
    23.
  23. Sattari, S., & Mohammadi, P. (2011). Examine the relationship between information technology use and academic achievement of high school students. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 1(4), 81-96. (in Persian).
    24.
  24. Shabani, H. (2003). Education and cultural skills (Methods and techniques of teaching). Tehran: SAMT. (in Persian).
    25.
  25. Sheikh Zadeh, M., & MehrMohammadi, M. (2004). Elementary math learning software based on constructivist approach and evaluate it's effectiveness. Educational Innovation, 3(9), 32-48. (in Persian).
    26.
  26. Shobeiri, A., & Attaran, M. (2006). Utilizes software helps junior high school physical education and it's effect on academic achievement and engage students in the classroom. Master's Thesis. Tehran: Tarbiat Moallem University. (in Persian).
    27.
  27. Snyder, T. D., & Dillow, S. A. (2010). Digest of Education Statistics 2009 (NCES 2010-013). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U. S. Department of Education.
    28.
  28. Soleimanpoor, J, Khalkhali, A., & Fallah, L. (2010). Impact of ICT based teaching methods in creating sustainable learning lessons grade science. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 1(2), 77-93. (in Persian).
    29.
  29. Tileston, D. W. (2004). What every teacher should know about media and technology. United States of America, Corwin Press, INC.
    30.
  30. Zameni, F., & Kardan, S. (2010). Effective use of ICT in learning mathematics. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 1(1), 23-38. (in Persian).
    31.
  31. Zang, L., Watson, E. M., & Banfield, L. (2007). The efficacy of computer-assisted instruction versus face-to-face instruction in academic libraries: A systematic review. TheJournal of Academic Librarianship, 33(4), 478-484.
    32.

مقالات مرتبط

حقوق این وب‌سایت متعلق به سامانه مدیریت نشریات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی است.
حق نشر © 1403-1400

صفحه اصلی| عضویت/ ورود| درباره سند| تماس با ما|
[English] [العربية] [en] [ar]