بررسی اثرات برنامه های محرومیت زدایی در ارتقاء پایداری زیست محیطی در شهرستان قلعه گنج (پایلوت اقتصاد مقاومتی کشور)
محورهای موضوعی : توسعه پایدار
محمدطاهر رستمی
1
,
عباس ملک حسینی
2
,
مجید شمس
3
1 - دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد ملایر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ملایر، ایران. *(مسوول مکاتبات)
2 - دانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد ملایر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ملایر، ایران.
3 - استاد گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، واحد ملایر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ملایر، ایران.
کلید واژه: قلعه گنج, محرومیت زدایی, پایداری زیست محیطی, فقر.,
چکیده مقاله :
زمینه و هدف: فقر¬ يكي¬از مهمترين پيامدهاي¬توزيع ناعادلانه درآمدهاي ايجاد شده در بين افراد جامعه¬است. تداوم فقر تنش¬هاي زیست¬محیطی شديدي را در پي دارد كه هر از گاهي، كل¬جامعه را در برمیگیرد. مقاله¬حاضر با هدف¬بررسی اثرات برنامه¬های محرومیت-زدایی¬در ارتقاء پایداری زیست¬محیطی در شهرستان قلعه¬گنج انجام گرفته است. روش بررسی: روش تحقیق به صورت مطالعات کتابخانه ای و بررسی های میدانی میباشد جامعه آماری این پژوهش کل افراد شهرستان به تعداد 80 هزار نفر می باشد و نمونه گیری تصادفی ساده برای تعیین تعداد افراد انتخاب شده است. اطلاعات لازم جهت دستیابی به نتایج، از طریق پرسشنامه محقق ساخته صورت گرفت. به منظور تعیین پایایی پرسشنامه¬ی محقق ساخته از آلفای کرونباخ استفاده شد و روایی نیز از طریق روایی محتوایی و اکتشافی بررسی شد. یافته¬ها: استنتاج ها نشان می دهد که پیش فرض های مربوط به آزمون ها از میزان مناسب برخودار و ارتباط محرومیت زدایی با ابعاد زیست محیطی به ترتیب¬، 52/0، 38/0، 49/0(زمین، منابع آبی و منابع ژنتیکی) دارای رابطه بودند. بحث و نتیجه¬گیری: نتایج نشان داد که منابع آب، درختان و مراتع در وضعیت ناپایداری قرار دارند و تنها عاملی که وضعیتی نسبتا پایدار داشته خاک میباشد. درعين حال، ميزان مصرف برق، ضايعات جامد شهري و انتشار گازهاي گلخانه اي، از منظر زيست محيطي در سطح شهرستان در سطح مطلوب است. اجرای برنامه¬های محرومیت¬زدایی در ارتقاء پایداری زیست محیطی در شهرستان قلعه گنج این شهرستان را از وضعیت ناپایدار به نسبتا پایدار رشد داشته است.
Background and Objective: Poverty is one of the most important consequences of the unfair distribution of incomes among people in the society. The continuation of poverty leads to severe environmental tensions that sometimes involve the entire society. This article has been carried out with the aim of investigating the effects of deprivation-removal programs in promoting environmental sustainability in Qaleh ganj city. Material and Methodology: The research method is in the form of library studies and field surveys. The statistical population of this research is 80 thousand people in the city and simple random sampling has been chosen to determine the number of people. The necessary information to obtain the results was obtained through a researcher-made questionnaire. In order to determine the reliability of the researcher's questionnaire, Cronbach's alpha was used, and its validity was checked through content and exploratory validity. Findings: The conclusions show that the presuppositions related to the tests have an appropriate level and the relationship of deprivation with environmental dimensions, respectively, 0.52, 0.38, 0.49 (land, water resources and genetic resources) were related. Discussion and Conclusion: The results showed that water resources, trees and pastures are in an unstable state and the only factor that has a relatively stable state is the soil. At the same time, the amount of electricity consumption, urban solid waste and greenhouse gas emissions are at the optimal level from the environmental point of view of the city. The implementation of deprivation programs in the promotion of environmental sustainability in Qaleh ganj city has grown from an unstable situation to a relatively stable one.
1. Raghfar, Hossein, Mohammadi Fard, Zahra, Sangri Mahzab, Kobra. Measuring multidimensional poverty in Tehran. Economic research (sustainable growth and development). (2012). Year 13, No. 2, pp. 1-16. (In Persian)
2. Sejasi gheidari, Hamdollah, Sadeghlou, Tahereh, Mahmoudi, Ranking of villages based on livability indicators (case study: Nizam Abad village, Azadshahr city, human geography research, volume 5, Spring 2018, number 1. (In Persian)
3. Mohammad Amin, Khorasani, comparative analysis and evaluation of the views of residents and local managers regarding the livability of peri-urban villages in Varamin city. Geography and Development (2017), No. (51), 261-280. (In Persian)
4. Howley, P., Scott, M., & Redmond, D. (2009). Sustainability versus livability: An investigation of neighbourhood satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(6), 847-864.
5. 5.Dajian, Z., & Rogers, P. P. (2006). 2010 World Expo and urban life quality in Shanghai in terms of sustainable development. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 4(1), 15-22.
6. 6.Perogordo Madrid, D. (2007). The Silesia Megapolis. European Spatial Planning, 17(1), 23-33.
7. Timmer, V., & Seymoar, N. K. (2005). The livable city: World urban forum 2006, Vancouver Working Group Discussion Paper. Western Economic Diversification Canada.
8. Hall, Anthony and Mijelli, James, Social Policy and Development, translated by Mehdi Ebrahimi and Alireza Sadeghi, (2008). Tehran: Sociologists Publications.( In Persian)
9. Melki Saeed, Ahmadi Reza, Monfared Sajjad, Matogui Mohammad, Environmental development sustainability assessment using statistical tests in the cities of Khuzestan Border Province, Geographical Information Quarterly (Sephehr), (2013) Volume: 23, Number: 90. (In Persian)
10. Khalilabad kalantari Hossein, Abubakri Taher, ghaderi Reza, Pourali Mohammad Ali, Saidi Anwar. Assessing the feasibility of sustainable urban development indicators in border areas (case example: Piranshahr city)., 2018, urban management. (In Persian)
11. Rafiyan, Mojtaba et al. "Measuring the level of residents' satisfaction with the residential quality of Mehr housing; Case Study: Mehr Shahr Zahedan, Journal of Geography and Urban-Regional Survey, (2013) No. 12, Zahedan.( In Persian)
12. Safaipour, Masoud, Samira Moradi Monfard and Mohammad Reza Amiri. Evaluation and prioritization of sustainable urban development indicators using network analysis model, ANP case study: Zanjan city, Quarterly of Geography and Urban-Regional Studies, (2015) 19. (In Persian)
13. Sattarzadeh Bardsiri, Zahra. Evaluation of neighborhood development indicators with a sustainable development approach in small cities, case study: Bardsir city, Sistan and Baluchistan University Master's Thesis, (2015) Faculty of Geography and Environmental Planning. (In Persian)
14. Ebrahimi, Mahdi.. Income poverty, ability poverty and social exclusion: the evolution of concepts in the study of poverty and deprivation. social security (2015). Year 12, Number 45, pp. 37-59. (In Persian)
15. Soleimani, Mohammad et al. Organizing problematic urban contexts with neighborhood development approach using SWOT model and matrix (SQPM). Example: Sabon Pezkhaneh neighborhood, District 12, Tehran. Zagros Landscape Geographical Quarterly. 2012) Volume 5, Number 15; From page 161 to page 183. (In Persian)
16. Lehsaizadeh, Abdul Ali. Investigating the role of relative deprivation in the increase of urban violence in the studied marginal areas: Kermanshah City, Urban Studies, (2013) second year, number 9: pp. 21-64.( In Persian)
17. Gonzalez-Garcia, S., Manteiga, R., Moreira, M. T., & Feijoo, G. (2018). Assessing the sustainability of Spanish cities considering environmental and socio-economic indicators. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 599-610.
18. Ige, K. (2014). The Absolute-Relative Deprivation Dichotomy in Estimating Variations in Reaction to Inequality: Comparing Antecedents of Collective Action among Disadvantaged Groups. University of Zululand P/B, 87-101.
19. Valtenbergs, Visvaldis, Ainhoab González and Ralfs Piziks .2013. Selecting Indicators for Sustainable Development of Small Towns: The Case of Valmiera Municipality, ICTE in Regional Development, December 2013, Valmiera, Latvia, Procedia Computer Science 26.
20. Zelinsky, T. (2012). “Changes in Relative Material Deprivation in Regions of Slovakia and the Czech Republic”. Department of Regional Science and Manageme Faculty of Economics Technical University Slovakia, Panoeconomicus, 3. 335-353.
21. Devicienti, F., & Poggi, A. (2011). Poverty and social exclusion: two sides of the same coin or dynamically interrelated processes?. Applied Economics, 43(25), 3549-3571.
22. Nolan, B., & Whelan, C. T. (2010). Using non‐monetary deprivation indicators to analyze poverty and social exclusion: Lessons from Europe?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(2), 305-325.