The Effect of Multimedia-Based Instruction on Improving Iranian EFL Learners’ Grammar Knowledge and their Attitudes
الموضوعات :سیده فاطمه تقوی تکیار 1 , مهری جلالی 2
1 - Department of English, college of human science, Saveh Branch, Islamic Azad University, Saveh, Iran
2 - Assistant Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: computer assisted language learning (CALL), Textbook, grammar knowledge, multimedia application,
ملخص المقالة :
Applying technologies has recently caused language education to undertake influential modifications. Hence, this study tried to investigate the impact of using technology in form of multimedia on improving grammar knowledge of Iranian high school students and also examined their attitudes toward multimedia-based mode of instruction. To do so, three intact classes of lower intermediate students were randomly divided into three groups: multimedia, multimedia + textbook, and control group. After homogenizing the groups regarding their proficiency level, the pre-test was run and results indicated no significant difference. Treatment lasted for 8 sessions, during which the first experimental group was taught through using multimedia elements like cartoons, texts, and Power Point Presentation. The second group had their textbook besides multimedia, while the control group was instructed traditionally by means of the textbook. Comparing the groups’ scores on the post-test revealed the superiority of multimedia + textbook group over the other groups in their grammar test performance. The questionnaire outcomes also showed more positive tendency of the students in this group in comparison to the multimedia only group toward application of multimedia programs. Findings of this study might open a novel way to assist EFL learners to increase their grammar knowledge more successfully.
Al-jarf, L. (2007). Teaching vocabulary to EFL college students.Online Journal of Language Teaching, 8 (2), 2-8.
Alsied, S. M., & Pathan, M. M. (2013). The use of computer technology in EFL classroom: advantages and implications. IJ-ELTS, 1(1), 61-71.
Bitter, G. G., & Hatfield, M. M. (1997).A multimedia alternative for professional development. Teaching Education, Emerging Technology and the Education Classroom, 8 (2), 67–71.
Brunvand, S. (2010). Best practices for producing video content for teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10, 247-256. Retrieved from http://refhub.elsevier.com /S0742051X(14)00088-2/sref9
Chun, D., & Smith, B. (2016).Teaching in language use, language teaching, and language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (16), 64–80.
Chun-Y., & Hsiu, L. (2011). Metacognitive skills development: a web-based approach in higher education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10 (2), 140-150.
Davoodi, S. (2014). The effect of multimedia-based materials on L2 grammar proficiencydevelopment of Iranian high school EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 3(1), 99-110.
Fenstermacher, G. (1986). Philosophy of research on teaching: Three aspects. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 12-45). New York: Macmillan.
Ghanizadeh, A., & Razavi, A. (2015). The impact of using multimedia in English highschool classes on students' language achievement and goal orientation. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 4(2), 31-42.
Grabe M., & Grabe C. (1998). Integrating technology into meaningful learning, (2nded.).Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Johnson, D., Sutton, P., & Harris, N. (2001). Extreme programming requires extremelyeffective communication: Teaching effective communication skills to students in an IT degree. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Australian Society forComputers in Learning in Tertiary Education, Melbourne.
Kern, R. (2015). Language, literacy, and technology.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Koehler, N.A., Thompson, A.D., & Phye, G.D. (2011).A design study of amultimedia instructional grammar program with embedded tracking. Instructional Science, 39, 939–974.
Koehler, N. A., Thompson, A. D., & Phye, G. D. (2011).A design study of a multimedia instructional grammar program with embedded tracking. Instructional Science, 39(6), 939-974.
Lysenko, L. V., &Abrami, P. C. (2014). Promoting reading comprehension with the use of technology. Computers & Education, 75, 162-172.
Mayer, R.E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mehrgan, K. (2012). Computer-assisted language learning: A panacea for grammardevelopment. Advances in English Linguistics (AEL), 1(2), 25-29.
Mtebe, J. S., Mbwilo, B., & Kissaka, M. M. (2016). Factors influencing teachers’ use of multimedia enhanced content in secondary schools in Tanzania. The InternationalReview of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(2), 65-84.
Rachal, J. R. (1995). Adult reading achievement comparing computer-assisted and traditional approaches: A comprehensive review of the experimental literature. Reading Researchand Instruction, 34, 239-258.
Rostami, S., Akbari, O., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2015).The effect of smart school programsonEFL reading comprehension in an academic context.International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 4(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5861/ijrset.2014.936
Ruan, X. (2015).The Role of Multimodal in Chinese EFL Students’ AutonomousListening Comprehension & Multi-literacies.Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(3), 549-554. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0503.14
Sharma, H. L., & Pooja, L. (2016).Enhancing students’ interest in English language viamultimedia presentation. International Journal of Applied Research, 2(1), 275-281.
Stemler, L. (1997). Educational characteristics of multimedia: A literature review. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 6(4), 12-21.
Velleman, P.F., & Moore, D.S (1996). Multimedia for teaching statistics: promises and pitfalls. Stat, 50, 217-226.
Vernadakis, N., Zetou, E., Tsitskari, E., Giannousi, M., &Kioumourtzoglou, E.(2008).Student attitude and learning outcomes of multimedia computer-assisted versus traditional instruction in basketball. Education and Information Technologies, 13(3), 167-183.
Warschauer, M., Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 3, 57–71.
Wenhong, H. (2016). Study on college English teaching mode multimedia assisted based on computer platform. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering,11(7), 351-360. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijmue.2016.11.7.35
