The Influence of Pragmatic Approaches in Arab and Western Political Discourse on the Formation of Public Opinion About the Zionist-Palestinian Conflict
الموضوعات :Rafka Hasan Kareem 1 , Elahe Sadeghi Barzani 2 , Salih Mahdi Adai Al-Mamoory 3 , Ehsan Rezvani 4
1 - Department of English, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of English, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Babylon, Hilla, Iraq
4 - Department of English, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
الکلمات المفتاحية: Public Opinion, Zionist-Palestinian Conflict, Political Discussion, and Pragmatic Strategies,
ملخص المقالة :
This study looks at the practical tactics used by Western and Arab politicians to influence public perception of the Zionist-Palestinian conflict. The study shows a clear difference in the rhetorical strategies used by the two groups by examining political speeches and media statements. In order to portray Israel as the aggressor and appeal to cultural and ideological feelings that are appealing to their home audiences, Arab politicians frequently employ emotionally charged language and accusatory rhetoric. Western politicians, on the other hand, take a more impartial, diplomatic stance, emphasizing collaboration and amicable discussions to manage intricate geopolitical concerns. The results show that these opposing approaches have a big impact on public opinion, with Arab leaders rallying people to support Palestine and Western leaders trying to keep international alliances by encouraging moderation and compromise. By emphasizing how language shapes public perceptions and policy decisions, this study advances the fields of political pragmatics, cross-cultural communication, and conflict resolution. By providing insights into creating more successful communication strategies for international diplomacy, the research emphasizes the necessity for policymakers to take cultural differences in political communication into account.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, J. (2014). The communication of political power: The role of language in political discourse. Routledge.
Chilton, P. (2014). Language and politics: An introduction to political discourse analysis. Routledge.
Chilton, P. (2021). Metaphor and politics: The role of metaphor in political discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren, A. F. Snoeck Henkemans, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: Philosophy and rhetoric (pp. 131–145). Routledge.
Eemeren, F. H. van. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. In Argumentation in context (pp. 101–114). John Benjamins Publishing.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power. Routledge.
Gordon, N. (2010). Israel’s Palestinian problem: The rhetoric of violence and the politics of peace. Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 29-46.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Pappé, I. (2017). The history of modern Palestine: One land, two peoples. Cambridge University Press.
Quandt, W. B. (2005). Peace process: American diplomacy and the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1967. University of California Press.
Said, E. W. (1979). The question of Palestine. Vintage.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, S. (2018). The complexities of diplomacy in the Zionist-Palestinian conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 121-134.
van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. SAGE Publications.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2020). Strategic maneuvering in argumentation: The importance of context. Argumentation, 34(1), 17-30.
Zarefsky, J. (2019). Metaphor in political discourse: A comparative analysis. Journal of Political Linguistics, 2(2), 35-50.
Zureik, E. (2015). The Palestinians and the politics of discourse. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 103-114.
