Impact of Pragmatic Strategies in Arab and Western Political Discourse on Shaping Public Opinion Regarding the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict
Rafka Hasan Kareem
1
(
Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
)
Elahe Sadeghi Barzani
2
(
Department of English Language, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
)
Ehsan Rezvani
3
(
Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch,Isfahan, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Pragmatic Strategies, Political Discourse, Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Public Opinion,
چکیده مقاله :
This study examines the pragmatic strategies employed by Arab and Western politicians in shaping public opinion regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. By analyzing political speeches and media statements, the research reveals a distinct contrast in rhetorical approaches between the two groups. Arab politicians predominantly use emotionally charged language and accusatory rhetoric, framing Israel as the aggressor and appealing to cultural and ideological sentiments that resonate with their domestic audiences. In contrast, Western politicians adopt a more neutral, diplomatic tone, focusing on cooperation and peaceful negotiations to navigate complex geopolitical interests. The findings confirm that these divergent strategies significantly influence public sentiment, with Arab leaders mobilizing strong support for Palestine, while Western leaders attempt to maintain international alliances by promoting balance and compromise. This study contributes to the fields of political pragmatics, cross-cultural communication, and conflict resolution by highlighting the role of language in shaping public perceptions and policy decisions. The research emphasizes the need for policymakers to consider cultural differences in political communication, offering an understanding to develop more effective communication strategies for international diplomacy.
This study examines the pragmatic strategies employed by Arab and Western politicians in shaping public opinion regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. By analyzing political speeches and media statements, the research reveals a distinct contrast in rhetorical approaches between the two groups.
چکیده انگلیسی :
This study examines the pragmatic strategies employed by Arab and Western politicians in shaping public opinion regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. By analyzing political speeches and media statements, the research reveals a distinct contrast in rhetorical approaches between the two groups. Arab politicians predominantly use emotionally charged language and accusatory rhetoric, framing Israel as the aggressor and appealing to cultural and ideological sentiments that resonate with their domestic audiences. In contrast, Western politicians adopt a more neutral, diplomatic tone, focusing on cooperation and peaceful negotiations to navigate complex geopolitical interests. The findings confirm that these divergent strategies significantly influence public sentiment, with Arab leaders mobilizing strong support for Palestine, while Western leaders attempt to maintain international alliances by promoting balance and compromise. This study contributes to the fields of political pragmatics, cross-cultural communication, and conflict resolution by highlighting the role of language in shaping public perceptions and policy decisions. The research emphasizes the need for policymakers to consider cultural differences in political communication, offering an understanding to develop more effective communication strategies for international diplomacy.
This study examines the pragmatic strategies employed by Arab and Western politicians in shaping public opinion regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. By analyzing political speeches and media statements, the research reveals a distinct contrast in rhetorical approaches between the two groups.
Al-Rawi, A. (2019). Political discourse and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Charteris-Black, J. (2005). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, J. (2014). The communication of political power: The role of language in political discourse. Routledge.
Chilton, P. (2014). Language and politics: An introduction to political discourse analysis. Routledge.
Chilton, P. (2021). Metaphor and politics: The role of metaphor in political discourse. Palgrave Macmillan.
Eemeren, F. H. van, & Houtlosser, P. (2002). Strategic maneuvering: Maintaining a delicate balance. In F. H. van Eemeren, A. F. Snoeck Henkemans, & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Argumentation, communication, and fallacies: Philosophy and rhetoric (pp. 131–145). Routledge.
Eemeren, F. H. van. (2010). Strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. In Argumentation in context (pp. 101–114). John Benjamins Publishing.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power. Routledge.
Gaber, H. (2016). Public opinion and the political discourse on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Gordon, N. (2010). Israel’s Palestinian problem: The rhetoric of violence and the politics of peace. Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 29-46.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). Academic Press.
Kelman, H. (2018). The role of language in conflict resolution: Understanding rhetoric in international diplomacy.
Lustick, I. S. (2019). The Israeli-Palestinian conflict in a global context: Analyzing public opinion.
Pappé, I. (2017). The history of modern Palestine: One land, two peoples. Cambridge University Press.
Quandt, W. B. (2005). Peace process: American diplomacy and the Arab-Israeli conflict since 1967. University of California Press.
Said, E. W. (1979). The question of Palestine. Vintage.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, S. (2018). The complexities of diplomacy in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 62(1), 121-134.
van Dijk, T. A. (2011). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. SAGE Publications.
van Eemeren, F. H. (2020). Strategic maneuvering in argumentation: The importance of context. Argumentation, 34(1), 17-30.
Zaharna, R. S. (1995). The public diplomacy of the Arab states in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Zarefsky, J. (2019). Metaphor in political discourse: A comparative analysis. Journal of Political Linguistics, 2(2), 35-50.
Zureik, E. (2015). The Palestinians and the politics of discourse. Critical Sociology, 41(1), 103-114.
