Evaluation of ELT Textbooks in Iran Based on Cunningworth’s Model: Top Notch Series in Focus
الموضوعات : نشریه تخصصی زبان، فرهنگ، و ترجمه (دوفصلنامه)
1 - کارشناس ارشد مترجمی زبان انگلیسی، موسسه ی زبانسرای تهران، شعبه ی بندرعباس، ایران
الکلمات المفتاحية: Textbook evaluation, Cunningsworth’s checklist, Top Notch series,
ملخص المقالة :
English Language Teaching (ELT) textbooks serve as the basis for language inputs that learners receive and language practices that occur in the classroom. The objective of this analysis is the evaluation of the Top-Notch Intermediate series based on a modified version of the Cunningworth’s (1995) checklist. The checklist consisted of 9 sections, including 79 items, which were distributed among EFL teachers. A total of 10 teachers were selected to participate in this study. The teachers had taught textbooks under analysis for at least one year and had taught English as a foreign language for at least seven years. Six of the teachers were females; one of them was male; two of them were Ph.D. students; one of them had an M.A. degree; and four of them were B.A. graduates. The data collected through the checklist was analyzed quantitatively by SPSS. The study's findings revealed that Top Notch held up reasonably well to a detailed and in-depth evaluation. The findings have illuminative implications for teachers, material developers, and institutional/academic administrators.
References
Ahour, T., Towhidiyan, B., & Saeidi, M. (2014). The Evaluation of"
English Textbook 2" Taught in Iranian High Schools from
Teachers' Perspectives. English language teaching, 7(3), 150-158.
Alharbi, A. (2015). A descriptive-evaluative study of a Saudi EFL
textbook series. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1079946.
Al-sowat, H. (2012). An evaluation of English language textbook, Say it
in English, for first-year intermediate grade in Saudi
Arabia. Journal of studies in curriculum and supervision, 3(2),
332-413.
Alshehri, A. (2016). Textbook evaluation: teachers’ perspectives on
cutting edge. International Journal of English Language
Education, 4(2), 91-106.
Amalsaleh, E. (2004). The representation of social actors in the EFL
textbooks in Iran. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Shiraz
University, Shiraz, Iran.
Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL
textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The
Internet TESL Journal, 8(2), 1-9.
Apriyani, L. A., & Robiasih, R. H. (2019). Eight grade text book
evaluation by Cunningsworth’ s theory. Journal of English
Language and Pedagogy, 2(2), 94-103.
Awasthi, J. R. (2006). Textbook and Its Evaluation. (Online). Vol. 11 No.
1-2.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Macmillan.
Davison, W. F. (1976). Factors in Evaluating and Selecting Texts for the
Foreign-Language Classroom. English Language Teaching
Journal, 30(4), 310-314.
Daud, A., & Celce-Murcia, M. (1979). Selecting and evaluating
textbooks. Teaching English as a second or foreign language.
New York, NY: Newbury House.
Iraji, A. (2007). Pragmatic features of New Interchange: How
communicative and task-based it is. Unpublished master’s thesis,
Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Jahangard, A. (2007). Evaluation of EFL/ESL materials taught at Iranian
high schools. Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 130-150.
Ashkevar-Vakili, R. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 4(1) (2021), 197-217
216
Keban, N., Muhtar, A., & Zen, E. L. (2012). A content analysis on English
for kids grade 3, a textbook used in elementary schools in
Malang. Retrieved February, 4, 2014.
Littlejohn, A. (1998). materials: inside the Trojan Horse. Materials
development in language teaching, 190.
McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2012). Materials and Methods in ELT. John
Wiley & Sons.
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language
teaching (Vol. 558). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
McGrath, P. J., Stevens, B. J., Walker, S. M., & Zempsky, W. T. (Eds.).
(2013). Oxford textbook of paediatric pain. Oxford University
Press.
Mukundan, J., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2012). Evaluative Criteria of an
English Language Textbook Evaluation Checklist. Journal of
Language Teaching & Research, 3(6).
Mohseni, M., & Rahmanpanah, H. (2020). Language Learning Materials
Development for Teachers’ Professional Development. Journal of
Language and Translation, 10(1), 49-64.
Ramadhana, M. A., Indah, O. D., & Suhardi, S. (2019). An evaluation of
English language textbook: interlanguage English for senior high
school students. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 33-
39.
Rashidi, N., & Bahrmai, M. (2012). An in-depth evaluation of
intermediate Top Notch. Journal of studies in Learning and
Teaching English, 1(2).
Razmjoo, A. (2007). High schools or private institutes textbooks? Which
fulfill communicative language teaching principles in the Iranian
context? Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 126-140.
Saslow, J. M., Ascher, A., Morsberger, R. E., Ruzicka, D., Long, W. P.,
& Laporte, P. (2011). Top Notch. Pearson Education.
Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT
journal, 42(4), 237-246.
Soozandehfar, S. M. A., & Sahragard, R. (2011). A textbook evaluation
of speech acts and language functions in Top Notch series. Theory
and Practice in Language Studies, 1(12), 1831-1838.
Tavakol, M., & Sayadian, S. (2014). An evaluation of Top-Notch
fundamental A and B. International Journal of Research, 3(2),
101-114.
Ashkevar-Vakili, R. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 4(1) (2021), 197-217
217
Tomlinson, B. (2018). Text-driven approaches to task-based language
teaching. Folio, 18(2), 04-07.
Toolabi, J. (2002). Characterization of language functions in the Iranian
high school English textbooks. Unpublished master’s thesis.
Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Tucker, C. A. (1975). Evaluating beginning textbooks. In English
Teaching Forum (Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 335-361).
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
(2003a). Literacy: A UNESCO perspective. Paris: Author.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
(2006a). Education for all. Paris: Author. Retrieved September 22,
2006, from http://www.unesco.org/education/efa/
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.
(2006b). Summary of the budget: 32 C/5 (2004-2005). Paris:
Author. Retrieved September 18, 2006, from
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=14072&UR L_ D.O.
= D.O. _TO PIC& U.R._ SECTION=201.html
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Theory and practice. Great
Britain.
Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT
journal, 37(3), 251-255.
Yarmohammadi, L. (2002). Tahlil va naqdi Kolli bar Ketabha-ye darsi-ye
Zabane Engelisi-ye qabl az daneshgah (A general analysis and
criticism of English textbooks used before entering university).
Name-ye Farhangestan- e Olum, 18, 67-80.
Zare-Moayedi, I. (2007). An in-depth evaluation of interchange series
(3rd ed), Unpublished master’s thesis, Shiraz University, Shiraz.
